An Activity Theory Analysis of Search & Rescue Collective Sensemaking and Planning Practices

Search and rescue (SAR), a disaster response activity performed to locate and save victims, primarily involves collective sensemaking and planning. SAR responders learn to search and navigate the environment, process information about buildings, and collaboratively plan with maps. We synthesize data from five sources, including field observations and interviews, to understand the informational components of SAR and how information is recorded and communicated. We apply activity theory, uncovering unforeseen factors that are relevant to the design of collaboration systems and training solutions. Through our analysis, we derive design implications to support collaborative information technology and training systems: mixing physical and digital mapping; mixing individual and collective mapping; building for different levels and sources of information; and building for different rules, roles, and activities.

[1]  Leysia Palen,et al.  The Crowd is the Territory: Assessing Quality in Peer-Produced Spatial Data During Disasters , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Young ae Hahn,et al.  Activity Centered Design: An Ecological Approach to Designing Smart Tools and Usable Systems , 2005 .

[3]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[4]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Applying Systemic-Structural Activity Theory to Design of Human-Computer Interaction Systems , 2014 .

[5]  M. Agar,et al.  Ethnography: an overview. , 1997, Substance use & misuse.

[6]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  CoSense: enhancing sensemaking for collaborative web search , 2009, CHI.

[7]  Sultan A. Alharthi,et al.  A Framework of Input Devices to Support Designing Composite Wearable Computers , 2020, HCI.

[8]  Sultan A. Alharthi,et al.  A Vision of Augmented Reality for Urban Search and Rescue , 2019, HTTF.

[9]  Agathoniki Trigoni,et al.  Supporting Search and Rescue Operations with UAVs , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies.

[10]  Sultan A. Alharthi,et al.  Investigating the Impact of Annotation Interfaces on Player Performance in Distributed Multiplayer Games , 2018, CHI.

[11]  Rui Chen,et al.  Data Model Development for Fire Related Extreme Events: An Activity Theory Approach , 2013, MIS Q..

[12]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Designing Technology for Shared Communication and Awareness in Wilderness Search and Rescue , 2020, Human–Computer Interaction Series.

[13]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Plans as Situated Action: An Activity Theory Approach to Workflow Systems , 1997, ECSCW.

[14]  Eva Jensen,et al.  Sensemaking in military planning: a methodological study of command teams , 2009, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[15]  Lian Pin Koh,et al.  Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans , 2017, bioRxiv.

[16]  Yang Wang,et al.  Flying Eyes and Hidden Controllers: A Qualitative Study of People’s Privacy Perceptions of Civilian Drones in The US , 2016, Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol..

[17]  Amanda Lee Hughes,et al.  "Site-seeing" in disaster: An examination of on-line social convergence , 2008 .

[18]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A Design Framework for Awareness Cues in Distributed Multiplayer Games , 2018, CHI.

[19]  E. Entin,et al.  Communication overhead: The hidden cost of team cognition. , 2004 .

[20]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness , 2010, CHI.

[21]  Sultan A. Alharthi,et al.  A Framework Supporting Selecting Space to Make Place in Spatial Mixed Reality Play , 2017, CHI PLAY.

[22]  Sultan A. Alharthi,et al.  Developing Future Wearable Interfaces for Human-Drone Teams through a Virtual Drone Search Game , 2021, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Helena M. Mentis,et al.  Supporting common ground and awareness in emergency management planning: A design research project , 2011, TCHI.

[24]  Justine I. Blanford,et al.  Use of Geospatial Data and Technology for Wilderness Search and Rescue by Nonprofit Organizations , 2018 .

[25]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Designing a Tangible Interface for Manager Awareness in Wilderness Search and Rescue , 2018, CSCW Companion.

[26]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Collaboration surrounding beacon use during companion avalanche rescue , 2014, CSCW.

[27]  Jean-Charles Marty,et al.  Mixed Reality Games , 2015, Int. J. Game Based Learn..

[28]  L. Palen,et al.  Crisis informatics—New data for extraordinary times , 2016, Science.

[29]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[30]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  The Naughty Drone: A Qualitative Research on Drone as Companion Device , 2016, IMCOM.

[31]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[32]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[33]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Theory Development in the Information Sciences. Diane H. Sonnenwald. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2016. 343 pp. $90.00 (Hardcover) (ISBN 978-1-4773-0824-0) , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  D. Norman.  The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition , 2013 .

[35]  Sultan A. Alharthi,et al.  Playing at Planning: Game Design Patterns from Disaster Response Practice , 2016, CHI PLAY.

[36]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. , 1993, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[37]  C. Castillo,et al.  Big Crisis Data: Social Media in Disasters and Time-Critical Situations , 2019 .

[38]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[39]  Sus Lundgren,et al.  Game Design Patterns , 2003, DiGRA Conference.

[40]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[41]  Lawrence R. Ness,et al.  Denzin’s Paradigm Shift: Revisiting Triangulation in Qualitative Research , 2018 .

[42]  Ann Morrison,et al.  Like bees around the hive: a comparative study of a mobile augmented reality map , 2009, CHI.

[43]  David S Alberts,et al.  Planning: Complex Endeavors , 2007 .

[44]  James A. Landay,et al.  Ubiquitous computing for firefighters: field studies and prototypes of large displays for incident command , 2004, CHI '04.

[45]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Infrastructure in the Wild: What Mapping in Post-Earthquake Nepal Reveals about Infrastructural Emergence , 2016, CHI.

[46]  John Millar Carroll.  HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science , 2003 .

[47]  Christian Reuter,et al.  Social Media in Crisis Management: An Evaluation and Analysis of Crisis Informatics Research , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[48]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[49]  Marshini Chetty,et al.  Spiders in the Sky: User Perceptions of Drones, Privacy, and Security , 2017, CHI.

[50]  Andruid Kerne,et al.  Implicit coordination in firefighting practice: design implications for teaching fire emergency responders , 2007, CHI.

[51]  Sultan A. Alharthi,et al.  Designing Future Disaster Response Team Wearables from a Grounding in Practice , 2018, APAScience.

[52]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Remote Communication in Wilderness Search and Rescue , 2020, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[53]  Wendy Guan,et al.  The growing role of web-based geospatial technology in disaster response and support. , 2013, Disasters.

[54]  Matthias Durr.  Understanding Information Age Warfare , 2016 .

[55]  CHRISTINE A. HALVERSON,et al.  Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories? , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[56]  Gregory Z. Bedny,et al.  Application of Systemic-Structural Activity Theory to Design and Training , 2014 .

[57]  Kelvin F. Cross,et al.  The “SMART” way to define and sustain success , 1988 .

[58]  Steven Reece,et al.  Human–agent collaboration for disaster response , 2015, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[59]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  Finding community through information and communication technology in disaster response , 2008, CSCW.

[60]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Emergency Response to Mumbai Terror Attacks: An Activity Theory Analysis , 2011, Cyber Security, Cyber Crime and Cyber Forensics.

[61]  G. Róheim.  Hansel and Gretel. , 1953, Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic.

[62]  K. WeiK..  The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 2009, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[63]  Giancarlo Valentin,et al.  Mobile Collaboration for Human and Canine Police Explosive Detection Teams , 2017, CSCW.

[64]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Moonlight in Miami : A Field Study of Human-Robot Interaction in the Context of an Urban Search and Rescue Disaster Response Training Exercise , 2003 .

[65]  Sultan A. Alharthi,et al.  An Architecture for Simulating Drones in Mixed Reality Games to Explore Future Search and Rescue Scenarios , 2018, ISCRAM.

[66]  Steve Benford,et al.  Can you see me now? , 2006, TCHI.

[67]  Alan D. Pearman,et al.  Activity Theory as a methodological and analytical framework for information practices in Emergency Management , 2011, ISCRAM.

[68]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.

[69]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Supporting disaster reconnaissance with social media data: A design-oriented case study of the 2013 Colorado floods , 2014, ISCRAM.

[70]  Sultan A. Alharthi,et al.  Mapping in the Wild: Toward Designing to Train Search & Rescue Planning , 2018, CSCW Companion.

[71]  B. Lomov.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1982 .

[72]  Brennan Jones.  Designing for Distributed Collaboration in Wilderness Search and Rescue , 2018, CSCW Companion.

[73]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  An Exploratory Study of the Use of Drones for Assisting Firefighters During Emergency Situations , 2019, CHI.

[74]  Afsaneh Doryab,et al.  Activity analysis: applying activity theory to analyze complex work in hospitals , 2011, CSCW.

[75]  Gunnar Stevens,et al.  Handy navigation in ever-changing spaces: an ethnographic study of firefighting practices , 2008, DIS '08.

[76]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design , 2006, First Monday.

[77]  Jason C. Yip,et al.  Live Physiological Sensing and Visualization Ecosystems: An Activity Theory Analysis , 2017, CHI.

[78]  Ralph Renger,et al.  Being smart about writing SMART objectives. , 2017, Evaluation and program planning.

[79]  Willem J. Muhren,et al.  Sensemaking and information management in humanitarian disaster response: Observations from the TRIPLEX exercise , 2009 .

[80]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[81]  Sultan A. Alharthi,et al.  Practical Insights into the Design of Future Disaster Response Training Simulations , 2018, ISCRAM.

[82]  Robert E. Roth,et al.  Cartographic Interaction Primitives: Framework and Synthesis , 2012 .

[83]  Rjoè,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work , 2005 .

[84]  Reeshad S. Dalal,et al.  The effects of member expertise on group decision-making and performance , 2002 .

[85]  Huiji Gao,et al.  Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[86]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Theoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness, A Critical Review , 2000 .

[87]  Morten Fjeld,et al.  Tangible tabletops for emergency response: an exploratory study , 2013, MIDI '13.

[88]  F. Segor,et al.  Instantaneous Autonomous Aerial Reconnaissance for Civil Applications A UAV based approach to support security and rescue forc s , 2011 .

[89]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement , 1988 .

[90]  Vikas Singh,et al.  National Incident Management System , 2007 .

[91]  Nicolas Lalone,et al.  The Structure of Citizen Bystander Offering Behaviors Immediately After the Boston Marathon Bombing , 2020, HICSS.

[92]  Richard E. Hayes,et al.  Understanding Command and Control , 2011 .

[93]  T. Brooks.  Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[94]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  An Activity Theory Approach to Modeling Dispatch-Mediated Emergency Response , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[95]  C. Mills.  Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive , 1940 .

[96]  Hitesh Nidhi Sharma,et al.  Disaster mitigation and preparedness using linked open data , 2013, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[97]  Harsha Chenji,et al.  A wireless system for reducing response time in Urban Search & Rescue , 2012, 2012 IEEE 31st International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC).

[98]  Lorna Heaton.  Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[99]  Jonas Landgren,et al.  A study of emergency response work: patterns of mobile phone interaction , 2007, CHI.

[100]  Simon Grand,et al.  Unpacking the Dynamics of Ecologies of Routines: Mediators and Their Generative Effects in Routine Interactions , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[101]  M. Chalmers,et al.  Seamful and Seamless Design in Ubiquitous Computing , 2003 .

[102]  R. Murphy,et al.  Up from the Rubble: Lessons Learned about HRI from Search and Rescue , 2005 .

[103]  Andruid Kerne,et al.  The Team Coordination Game: Zero-fidelity simulation abstracted from fire emergency response practice , 2011, TCHI.

[104]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[105]  付伶俐.  打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[106]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[107]  Steven Reece,et al.  Supporting Team Coordination on the Ground: Requirements from a Mixed Reality Game , 2014, COOP.

[108]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  An activity theory analysis of boundary objects in cross-border information systems development for disaster management , 2012, Security Informatics.

[109]  Steven Reece,et al.  Building a Birds Eye View: Collaborative Work in Disaster Response , 2015, CHI.

[110]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Elevating Communication, Collaboration, and Shared Experiences in Mobile Video through Drones , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[111]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Workspace Awareness in Real-Time Distributed Groupware: Framework, Widgets, and Evaluation , 1996, BCS HCI.

[112]  Jie Liu,et al.  uEmergency: a collaborative system for emergency management on very large tabletop , 2012, ITS '12.

[113]  Igor Dolgov,et al.  Activity Theory as a Framework for Integrating Uas Into the Nas: A Field Study of Crew Member Activity During Uas Operations Near a Non-Towered Airport , 2018, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.

[114]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Working and sustaining the virtual "Disaster Desk" , 2013, CSCW.

[115]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[116]  Steve Benford,et al.  Performing Mixed Reality , 2011 .

[117]  David V. Keyson,et al.  Talking about implications for design in pattern language , 2012, CHI.

[118]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Enhancing learning: a study of how mobile devices can facilitate sensemaking , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[119]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Activity theory and information seeking , 2009, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[120]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[121]  M. Marshall.  Sampling for qualitative research. , 1996, Family practice.

[122]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Understanding together: sensemaking in collaborative information seeking , 2010, CSCW '10.

[123]  Leysia Palen,et al.  "Voluntweeters": self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis , 2011, CHI.