Carotid plaque analysis: comparison of dual-source computed tomography (CT) findings and histopathological correlation.

PURPOSE Plaque morphology is an important predictor of stroke risk and may also be a predictor of postoperative outcome after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Thus, the purpose of our study was to evaluate the findings of preoperative dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) of carotid plaque morphology and correlate these findings with histopathological findings. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty patients undergoing CEA due to neurological events and high-grade carotid artery stenosis were evaluated with DSCT for degree of stenosis following the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria and for non-invasive plaque morphology prior to CEA. CT protocol was as follows (SOMATOM Definition, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany): A dual-energy protocol was used with tube A (140 kV, 55 mA) and tube B (80 kV, 230 mA) with 2 x 64 x 0.6-mm collimation, pitch 0.65 and rotation time of 0.33 s. Histopathological work-up was performed on the surgically retrieved tissues. The findings from DSCT and histopathology were compared with respect to image quality and plaque composition (fatty plaque, mixed plaque and calcified plaque), were correlated with histological specimens and classified according to the American Heart Association (AHA) classification of atherosclerotic plaque. Pearson correlation and kappa statistics were performed. RESULTS The image quality of DSCT was rated as 'excellent' in all the examinations. The mean degree of stenosis was quantified as 82%. The sensitivity of DSCT for the detection of calcification was 100% (standard deviation (SD) 0%, confidence interval (CI): 99-100). While the sensitivity for the detection of mixed plaques was 89% (SD 12%, CI: 79-98), it was 85% (SD 10%, CI: 76-92) for the detection of low-density fatty plaques. The mean degree of agreement was k=0.81. CONCLUSION DSCT angiography of the carotid arteries is feasible and the evaluation of carotid plaque composition allows non-invasive assessment of different plaque components. This may have an impact on the non-invasive differentiation of vulnerable plaques.

[1]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2008, Circulation.

[2]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Comparison between 2D and 3D high‐resolution black‐blood techniques for carotid artery wall imaging in clinically significant atherosclerosis , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  M. Wintermark,et al.  High-Resolution CT Imaging of Carotid Artery Atherosclerotic Plaques , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[4]  D. Sackett,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  R. Günther,et al.  Which Iodine concentration in chest CT? – A prospective study in 300 patients , 2008, European Radiology.

[7]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[8]  W. Kerwin,et al.  The vulnerable, or high-risk, atherosclerotic plaque: noninvasive MR imaging for characterization and assessment. , 2007, Radiology.

[9]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Clinical alert: benefit of carotid endarterectomy for patients with high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Stroke and Trauma Division. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) investigators. , 1991, Stroke.

[10]  C. Romanowski,et al.  Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures , 2007, Neuroradiology.

[11]  D. Berman,et al.  From Vulnerable Plaque to Vulnerable Patient—Part III: Executive Summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force Report , 2006 .

[12]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II. , 2003, Circulation.

[13]  M. Arai,et al.  In Vivo Quantitative Tissue Characterization of Human Coronary Arterial Plaques by Use of Integrated Backscatter Intravascular Ultrasound and Comparison With Angioscopic Findings , 2002, Circulation.

[14]  M. Reiser,et al.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience , 2007, European Radiology.

[15]  J. Slattery,et al.  Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) , 1998, The Lancet.

[16]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Image Quality and Reconstruction Intervals of Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography: Recommendations for ECG-Pulsing Windowing , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[17]  A. Buchan,et al.  *North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Steering Committee. Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis. , 1991 .

[18]  C. Kramer,et al.  Calcified carotid atherosclerotic plaque is associated less with ischemic symptoms than is noncalcified plaque on MDCT. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  E. Ballotta,et al.  Carotid plaque gross morphology and clinical presentation: a prospective study of 457 carotid artery specimens. , 2000, The Journal of surgical research.

[20]  E. Boerwinkle,et al.  From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. , 2003, Circulation.

[21]  W S Kerwin,et al.  MR imaging of adventitial vasa vasorum in carotid atherosclerosis , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2007, Circulation.

[23]  Juan Alvarez-Linera,et al.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  C. Yuan,et al.  Prevalence of American Heart Association type VI carotid atherosclerotic lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging for different levels of stenosis as measured by duplex ultrasound. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  A. Nicolaides,et al.  Determinants of carotid plaque instability: echoicity versus heterogeneity. , 2001, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[26]  M. Eliasziw,et al.  The Risk and Benefit of Endarterectomy in Women With Symptomatic Internal Carotid Artery Disease , 2005, Stroke.

[27]  Spyretta Golemati,et al.  Echogenicity of B‐mode Sonographic Images of the Carotid Artery , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[28]  R. Vanninen,et al.  How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography? , 1996, Neuroradiology.

[29]  A. Nicolaides,et al.  Significance of sonographic tissue and surface characteristics of carotid plaques. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[30]  A. Nicolaides,et al.  Carotid Plaque Echolucency Increases the Risk of Stroke in Carotid Stenting: The Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) Study , 2004, Circulation.

[31]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Classification of Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Lesions With In Vivo Multicontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, Circulation.

[32]  M Lell,et al.  Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[33]  Fei Liu,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Carotid Atherosclerosis: Plaque Analysis , 2007, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[34]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Histological Correlates of Carotid Plaque Surface Morphology on Lumen Contrast Imaging , 2004, Circulation.

[35]  川崎 雅規,et al.  Noninvasive quantitative tissue characterization and two-dimensional color-coded map of human atherosclerotic lesions using ultrasound integrated backscatter : Comparison between histology and integrated backscatter images , 2002 .

[36]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Dual-Source Computed Tomography: Advances of Improved Temporal Resolution in Coronary Plaque Imaging , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[37]  Christopher M Kramer,et al.  Composition of the Stable Carotid Plaque: Insights From a Multidetector Computed Tomography Study of Plaque Volume , 2007, Stroke.

[38]  C Georg,et al.  Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  C. Yuan,et al.  Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[40]  W. Kalender,et al.  Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography--initial experience. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[41]  Peter M. Rothwell,et al.  Histological Correlates of Carotid Plaque Surface Morphology on Lumen Contrast Imaging , 2004 .

[42]  W. Bautz,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using three different techniques: Accuracy compared with intraarterial x‐ray angiography and endarterectomy specimens , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[43]  George Tomlinson,et al.  Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. , 2003, Radiology.