Secondary task workload test bench: 2TB

The scope of the project was to develop a simulator-based test method for assessing the load imposed on the driver from secondary tasks (in-vehicle equipment), i.e. to investigate commonly used performance indicators for their sensitivity to different levels of difficulty of secondary tasks loading on different modalities, and to evaluate their robustness across platforms.

[1]  Lana M Trick,et al.  Testing assumptions implicit in the use of the 15-second rule as an early predictor of whether an in-vehicle device produces unacceptable levels of distraction. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  N. Nugent,et al.  European Commission , 1993, European Energy and Environmental Law Review.

[3]  J A Michon,et al.  Explanatory pitfalls and rule-based driver models. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  D. Strayer,et al.  Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Jeffry Allen Greenberg,et al.  THE EFFECT OF LATERAL MOTION CUES DURING SIMULATED DRIVING , 2003 .

[6]  Paul Green,et al.  THE 15-SECOND RULE FOR DRIVER INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[7]  Paul Green,et al.  Visual, Auditory, Cognitive, and Psychomotor Demands of Real In-Vehicle Tasks , 2007 .

[8]  H SAMPSON.  Pacing and performance on a serial addition task. , 1956, Canadian journal of psychology.

[9]  Takahiro Wada,et al.  How Do Distracted and Normal Driving Differ: An Analysis of the ACAS Naturalistic Driving Data , 2007 .

[10]  D. Gronwall.  Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  Gary L. Rupp,et al.  Performance Metrics for Assessing Driver Distraction: The Quest for Improved Road Safety , 2011 .

[12]  Paul Green,et al.  Task acceptability and workload of driving city streets, rural roads, and expressways: ratings from video clips , 2007 .

[13]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  Tania Dukic,et al.  UPPÅT : uppföljning av åkeriers trafiksäkerhetsarbete , 2009 .

[15]  Gary Burnett,et al.  Assessment of the occlusion technique as a means for evaluating the distraction potential of driver support systems , 2006 .

[16]  J Engstroem,et al.  SafeTE final report , 2007 .

[17]  David H. Weir,et al.  A STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF VARYING VISUAL OCCLUSION AND TASK DURATION CONDITIONS ON DRIVER BEHAVIOR AND PERFORMANCE WHILE USING A SECONDARY TASK HUMAN-MACHINE INTERFACE. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN DRIVING, SEATING AND VISION , 2003 .

[18]  Johan Engström,et al.  Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty , 2005 .

[19]  Johan Engström,et al.  Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving , 2005 .

[20]  C. Wickens,et al.  Applied Attention Theory , 2007 .

[21]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  DRIVER DISTRACTION WITH WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[22]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering: New Wine in New Bottles , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..