The link between information processing capability and competitive advantage mediated through decision-making effectiveness

Abstract While research underpinned by the resource-based view (RBV) appears to suggest that IT-enabled capabilities are positively linked to competitive advantage, such a link is often seen as a black box as the processes through which competitive advantage can be gained appears unclear. In particular, research appears to suggest that information processing capability is linked to decision-making effectiveness and competitive advantage; however, little research appears to examine the interrelationship among them. This study, drawing on the RBV, develops a mediation model to examine the link between competitive advantage and the key tenets of value, rarity, inimitability and non-substitutability of information processing capability in the context of business analytics; and whether this link is mediated through decision-making effectiveness. Based on data collected from 633 UK companies, this study shows that there is a positive link between the value, rarity and inimitability characteristics of information processing capability and competitive advantage, which is partially mediated by decision-making effectiveness. The findings contribute to the theoretical development of the RBV by developing a mediation model that looks inside the black box. They also contribute to managers’ knowledge and understanding of the mechanism through which the strategic value of information processing capability can be maximized.

[1]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Antecedents and outcomes of strategic IS alignment: an empirical investigation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[2]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[3]  Richard Makadok.  Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[4]  Allard C.R. van Riel,et al.  Improving Screening Decision Making through Transactive Memory Systems: A Field Study , 2013 .

[5]  N. Shepherd,et al.  The Influence of Context on the Strategic Decision‐Making Process: A Review of the Literature , 2014 .

[6]  M. A. Ismail,et al.  Information infrastructure capability and organisational competitive advantage: Framework , 2015 .

[7]  T. Davenport.  Competing on analytics. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[8]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  An holistic approach to understanding the changing nature of organisational structure , 2010, Inf. Technol. People.

[9]  Thomas E. Decarlo,et al.  How sales manager experience and historical data trends affect decision making , 2015 .

[10]  Guangming Cao,et al.  Linking Business Analytics to Decision Making Effectiveness: A Path Model Analysis , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[12]  James W. Fredrickson,et al.  Inertia And Creeping Rationality In Strategic Decision Processes , 1989 .

[13]  C. Collins,et al.  STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES IN CREATING ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[14]  Gideon D. Markman,et al.  Patents as Surrogates for Inimitable and Non-Substitutable Resources , 2004 .

[15]  J. Child,et al.  Influences on strategic decision effectiveness: Development and test of an integrative model , 2007 .

[16]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Effect of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[18]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[19]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[20]  Morgan Swink,et al.  How the Use of Big Data Analytics Affects Value Creation in Supply Chain Management , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Claudia van Oppen,et al.  USING PLS PATH MODELING FOR ASSESSING HIERARCHICAL CONSTRUCT MODELS : GUIDELINES AND EMPIRICAL , 2022 .

[22]  Mitzi M. Montoya,et al.  The Impact of Product Portfolio Strategy on Financial Performance: The Roles of Product Development and Market Entry Decisions , 2014 .

[23]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[25]  Saggi Nevo,et al.  The Formation and Value of IT-Enabled Resources: Antecedents and Consequences of Synergistic Relationships , 2010, MIS Q..

[26]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[27]  R. Nolan,et al.  Information technology and the board of directors. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[28]  G. Hult,et al.  TOWARD GREATER UNDERSTANDING OF MARKET ORIENTATION AND THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2007 .

[29]  Dominic Barton,et al.  Making advanced analytics work for you. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[30]  Frank F. Land,et al.  Matching an IT Project with an appropriate method of evaluation: a research note on ‘Evaluating Investments in IT’ , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[31]  Tony S. Wirjanto,et al.  Path Dependence of Dynamic Information Technology Capability: An Empirical Investigation , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Varun Grover,et al.  Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  J. Spender,et al.  The Resource-Based View: A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques , 2009 .

[34]  T. Davenport,et al.  Data to Knowledge to Results: Building an Analytic Capability , 2001 .

[35]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[36]  Ali Tafti,et al.  Information Technology and Firm Profitability: Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence , 2012, MIS Q..

[37]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  A. Borison,et al.  Prediction Markets: A New Tool for Strategic Decision Making , 2010 .

[39]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Strategic Alignment Between Business and Information Technology: A Knowledge-Based View of Behaviors, Outcome, and Consequences , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[41]  Tony S. Wirjanto,et al.  Role of IT executives in the firm's ability to achieve competitive advantage through IT capability , 2012, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[43]  I. Yeoman.  Competing on analytics: The new science of winning , 2009 .

[44]  Vijay Khatri,et al.  Business analytics: Why now and what next? , 2014 .

[45]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[46]  Lior Fink,et al.  Exploring the perceived business value of the flexibility enabled by information technology infrastructure , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[47]  B. Newell,et al.  Search strategies in decision making: the success of “success” , 2004 .

[48]  Robin L. Dillon,et al.  How Near-Misses Influence Decision Making Under Risk: A Missed Opportunity for Learning , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[49]  Gi Mun Kim,et al.  IT Capabilities, Process-Oriented Dynamic Capabilities, and Firm Financial Performance , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Indranil Bose,et al.  Managing a Big Data project: The case of Ramco Cements Limited , 2015 .

[51]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[52]  Oliver Schilke.  On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities for Competitive Advantage: The Nonlinear Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism , 2014 .

[53]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[54]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[55]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[56]  Bryan Hattingh,et al.  The competitive advantage , 2007 .

[57]  Scott L. Newbert.  Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research , 2007 .

[58]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  Strategic Decision Processes: Critical Review and Future Directions , 1993 .

[59]  C. C. Miller,et al.  Decisional comprehensiveness and firm performance: towards a more complete understanding , 2008 .

[60]  Amita Goyal Chin,et al.  Improving debt collection processes using rule-based decision engines: A case study of Capital One , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[61]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING , 1995 .

[62]  H. Scarbrough.  Path(ological) Dependency? Core Competencies from an Organizational Perspective , 1998 .

[63]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[64]  Sunil Mithas,et al.  Business Analytics: Radical Shift or Incremental Change? , 2012, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[65]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[66]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[67]  Saggi Nevo,et al.  Firm-level benefits of IT-enabled resources: A conceptual extension and an empirical assessment , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Mark A. Mone,et al.  Formal Strategic Analyses and Organizational Performance: Decomposing the Rational Model , 2007 .

[69]  R. Little.  A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values , 1988 .

[70]  Guangming Cao,et al.  Systemic capabilities: the source of IT business value , 2016, Inf. Technol. People.

[71]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage , 1997 .

[72]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Survey research. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[73]  J. Baum,et al.  STRATEGIC DECISION SPEED AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[74]  E. Bonabeau.  Don't trust your gut. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[75]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[76]  Varun Grover,et al.  Examining the Relational Benefits of Improved Interfirm Information Processing Capability in Buyer-Supplier Dyads , 2013, MIS Q..

[77]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  The role of IT-enabled collaborative decision making in inter-organizational information integration to improve customer service performance , 2015 .

[78]  Varun Grover,et al.  Building and leveraging information in dynamic environments: The role of IT infrastructure flexibility as enabler of organizational responsiveness and competitive advantage , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[79]  Sergio G. Lazzarini,et al.  Strategizing by the government: Can industrial policy create firm‐level competitive advantage? , 2015 .

[80]  J. Henseler,et al.  Technology-based service proposal screening and decision-making effectiveness , 2011 .

[81]  Peter C. Verhoef,et al.  Successful customer value management: Key lessons and emerging trends , 2013 .

[82]  Thomas H. Davenport.  Keep Up with Your Quants , 2013 .

[83]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  Strategic decision making , 1992 .

[84]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[85]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[86]  Donald R. Lessard,et al.  Breaking the silos : Distributed knowledge and strategic responses to volatile exchange rates , 1996 .

[87]  John M. Ward,et al.  Beyond strategic information systems: towards an IS capability , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[88]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[89]  David J. Miller,et al.  An asymmetry‐based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainability , 2003 .

[90]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[91]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[92]  A. Rasheed,et al.  Rational decision‐making and firm performance: the moderating role of the environment , 1997 .

[93]  Abdul A. Rasheed,et al.  The Relationships between Top Management Demographic Characteristics, Rational Decision Making, Environmental Munificence, and Firm Performance , 2005 .

[94]  Eric T. G. Wang.  Effect of the fit between information processing requirements and capacity on organizational performance , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[95]  D. Mackinnon.  Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2008 .

[96]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Information Processing View of Organizations: An Exploratory Examination of Fit in the Context of Interorganizational Relationships , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[97]  J. Zenger,et al.  Making yourself indispensable. , 2011, Harvard business review.

[98]  Sam Ransbotham,et al.  Beyond the hype: The hard work behind analytics success , 2016 .

[99]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[100]  T. Andersen.  Integrating Decentralized Strategy Making and Strategic Planning Processes in Dynamic Environments , 2004 .

[101]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.