African American Men With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Are Candidates for Active Surveillance: The Will-Rogers Effect?

It is controversial whether African American men(AAM) with low-risk prostate cancer (PC) should be placed on active surveillance (AS). Recent literature indicates AAM diagnosed with low-risk disease have increased pathologic upgrading and disease progression. We evaluated the surgical pathology of AAM and Caucasians who underwent prostatectomy to assess the suitability of AAM for AS. We retrospectively reviewed 1,034 consecutive men who underwent open prostatectomy between 2004 and 2015; 345 Caucasians and 58 AAM met the American Urological Association criteria for low-risk PC. We excluded from analysis two men whose prostatectomies were aborted. Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for statistical analysis. AAM with low-risk PC have a lower rate of surgical upgrading and similar rates of adverse pathology compared with Caucasians. 29.8% of AAM (17/57) diagnosed with low-risk disease but 44.5% of Caucasians (153/344) had disease upgrading at prostatectomy (p < .04), although AAM overall were less likely to be clinically diagnosed with low-risk cancer (33.1 vs. 41.7%, p < .05). AAM with low-risk pathology were younger (median 55 vs. 59 years, p < .001) and had smaller prostates (32 vs. 35 g, p < .04). AAM with preoperative low-risk disease have lower rates of surgical upgrading and similar adverse pathology compared with Caucasians. There may be a Will-Rogers effect as AAM with aggressive disease appear more likely to be stratified into intermediate- and high-risk groups, leaving those AAM diagnosed with low-risk disease fully eligible for AS. Our results support that AS for AAM should remain a viable option.

[1]  Choung-Soo Kim,et al.  Characteristics of Anteriorly Located Prostate Cancer and the Usefulness of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosis. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[2]  J. Epstein,et al.  African-American Men with Gleason Score 3+3=6 Prostate Cancer Produce Less Prostate Specific Antigen than Caucasian Men: A Potential Impact on Active Surveillance. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[3]  P. Stattin,et al.  Gleason inflation 1998–2011: a registry study of 97 168 men , 2015, BJU international.

[4]  A. Partin,et al.  Racial disparities in oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy: long-term follow-up. , 2014, Urology.

[5]  E. Schaeffer,et al.  Active surveillance for African-American men with prostate cancer: proceed with caution. Con. , 2014, Oncology.

[6]  A. Partin,et al.  African American men with very low-risk prostate cancer exhibit adverse oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy: should active surveillance still be an option for them? , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. , 2012, European urology.

[8]  Michael N. Ferrandino,et al.  Race is associated with discontinuation of active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: Results from the Duke Prostate Center , 2012, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[9]  M. Soloway,et al.  Clinical and demographic characteristics associated with prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[10]  M. Oktay,et al.  Will the Modification of the Gleason Grading System Affect the Urology Practice? , 2010, International journal of surgical pathology.

[11]  W. Sakr,et al.  Evidence supports a faster growth rate and/or earlier transformation to clinically significant prostate cancer in black than in white American men, and influences racial progression and mortality disparity. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[12]  M. Sormani The Will Rogers phenomenon: the effect of different diagnostic criteria , 2009, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[13]  K. Trpkov,et al.  The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice , 2009, Histopathology.

[14]  S. Sonnad,et al.  Does race affect postoperative outcomes in patients with low-risk prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy? , 2009, Urology.

[15]  L. Egevad,et al.  The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens , 2006, Virchows Archiv.

[16]  J. Lloreta,et al.  African‐American men with nonpalpable prostate cancer exhibit greater tumor volume than matched white men , 2006, Cancer.

[17]  L. Egevad,et al.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma , 2005, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[18]  M. Banerjee,et al.  Should African‐American men be tested for prostate carcinoma at an earlier age than white men? , 1999, Cancer.

[19]  Christopher J Kane,et al.  Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016. , 2016, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[20]  B. Trock,et al.  Reclassification rates are higher among African American men than Caucasians on active surveillance. , 2015, Urology.

[21]  J. Epstein,et al.  Pathological examination of radical prostatectomy specimens in men with very low risk disease at biopsy reveals distinct zonal distribution of cancer in black American men. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[22]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[23]  G. Chornokur,et al.  The Prostate 71 : 985 ^ 997 ( 2011 ) Disparities at Presentation , Diagnosis , Treatment , and SurvivalinAfricanAmericanMen , Affectedby ProstateCancer , 2011 .