The robustness of democratic consensus

In linear models of consensus dynamics, the state of the various agents converges to a value which is a convex combination of the agents' initial states. We call it democratic if in the large scale limit (number of agents going to infinity) the vector of convex weights converges to 0 uniformly.Democracy is a relevant property which naturally shows up when we deal with opinion dynamic models and cooperative algorithms such as consensus over a network: it says that each agent's measure/opinion is going to play a negligible role in the asymptotic behavior of the global system. It can be seen as a relaxation of average consensus, where all agents have exactly the same weight in the final value, which becomes negligible for a large number of agents.We prove that starting from consensus models described by time-reversible stochastic matrices, under some mild technical assumptions, democracy is preserved when we perturb the linear dynamics in finitely many vertices. We want to stress that the local perturbation in general breaks the time-reversibility of the stochastic matrices. The main technical assumption needed in our result is the irreducibility of the large scale limit stochastic matrix, i.e. strong connectedness of the limit network of agents, and we show with an example that this assumption is indeed required.

[1]  Jean-Charles Delvenne,et al.  Democracy in Markov chains and its preservation under local perturbations , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[2]  Chiara Ravazzi,et al.  Gossips and Prejudices: Ergodic Randomized Dynamics in Social Networks , 2013, ArXiv.

[3]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Naïve Learning in Social Networks and the Wisdom of Crowds , 2010 .

[4]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2010, Math. Oper. Res..

[6]  Balázs Csanád Csáji,et al.  PageRank optimization by edge selection , 2009, Discret. Appl. Math..

[7]  Asuman Ozdaglar,et al.  Spread of (Mis)Information in Social Networks , 2009 .

[8]  V. Climenhaga Markov chains and mixing times , 2013 .

[9]  Roberto Tempo,et al.  Distributed Randomized Algorithms for the PageRank Computation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  C. D. Meyer,et al.  Updating finite markov chains by using techniques of group matrix inversion , 1980 .

[11]  A. Yu. Mitrophanov Stability and exponential convergence of continuous-time Markov chains , 2003 .

[12]  Ruggero Carli,et al.  Communication constraints in the average consensus problem , 2008, Autom..

[13]  Jie Lin,et al.  Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[14]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Spread of (Mis)Information in Social Networks , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  W. Woess Random walks on infinite graphs and groups, by Wolfgang Woess, Cambridge Tracts , 2001 .

[16]  Feller William,et al.  An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .

[17]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.