Limits of locomotor ability in subjects with a spinal cord injury

Study design:Case–control study with pair-wise matching.Objectives:To investigate the level of locomotor performance in spinal cord injury (SCI) subjects.Setting:Spinal Cord Injury Center of Balgrist University Hospital in Zurich, Switzerland.Methods:Seven well-recovered SCI subjects and controls performed three tests: (1) 6-Min Walk Test (6MWT), (2) treadmill walking with full and restricted vision and (3) repetitive stepping over an obstacle. In the latter task, the subjects had to step over an obstacle as low as possible, without touching it. The subjects performed three blocks of 50 trials each. They received acoustic signals that indicated obstacle approach and foot clearance. During the third block, vision was restricted. The main outcome measures were: (1) distance walked, (2) leg muscle activity, joint kinematics and double-support duration, (3) foot clearance, number of obstacle hits, leg muscle activity, joint kinematics and swing phase duration.Results:(1) No difference in the 6MWT between the groups. (2) Independent from vision, the double-support duration was increased in SCI subjects. (3) SCI subjects learned generally at a slower rate. They touched the obstacle more frequently when vision became restricted. Furthermore, we observed differences between the groups in rectus femoris and tibialis anterior EMG activity and swing phase duration.Conclusion:It appears that even in well-recovered SCI subjects, small deficiencies in functional gait can be determined, which remain undetected by clinical walking tests. In addition, SCI subjects learned a locomotor task at a slower rate. This indicates that rehabilitation programs should train (adaptive) locomotion in different (sensory) environments.

[1]  A. Patla,et al.  Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion: effect of obstacle height and width , 1993 .

[2]  A. Woodcock,et al.  Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. , 1982, British medical journal.

[3]  R. Tallis,et al.  Dual-task effects of talking while walking on velocity and balance following a stroke. , 2001, Age and ageing.

[4]  C. Bard,et al.  Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  V. Dietz,et al.  Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[6]  J. F. Yang,et al.  Contribution of peripheral afferents to the activation of the soleus muscle during walking in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  V. Dietz,et al.  Obstacle avoidance during human walking: transfer of motor skill from one leg to the other , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Wiebren Zijlstra,et al.  Assessment of spatio-temporal parameters during unconstrained walking , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[9]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  M. Ladouceur,et al.  A review of the adaptability and recovery of locomotion after spinal cord injury. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[11]  A. Wernig,et al.  Laufband locomotion with body weight support improved walking in persons with severe spinal cord injuries , 1992, Paraplegia.

[12]  H Barbeau,et al.  Recovery of walking after spinal cord injury. , 1997, Advances in neurology.

[13]  W. Siler,et al.  Grasping the handrails during treadmill walking does not alter sagittal plane kinematics of walking. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  G. S. Snoddy.  Learning and stability: a psychophysiological analysis of a case of motor learning with clinical applications. , 1926 .

[15]  Richard A. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[16]  L. Mollinger,et al.  Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[17]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Adaptation of the walking pattern to uphill walking in normal and spinal-cord injured subjects , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  D A Winter,et al.  An integrated EMG/biomechanical model of upper body balance and posture during human gait. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[19]  R. Waters,et al.  Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  A. Geurts,et al.  Recovery of motor skill following nervous system disorders: a behavioural emphasis. , 1993, Bailliere's clinical neurology.

[21]  M. Ladouceur,et al.  Chapter 2 A review of the adaptability and recovery of locomotion after spinal cord injury , 2002 .

[22]  G. Guyatt,et al.  The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. , 1985, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[23]  S. Hesse,et al.  Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control , 2003, Current opinion in neurology.

[24]  H Barbeau,et al.  Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): an international multicenter validity and reliability study , 2000, Spinal Cord.

[25]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  John F. Ditunno,et al.  Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision. , 2001 .

[27]  V. Dietz,et al.  Spinal Cord Lesion: Effects of and Perspectives for Treatment , 2001, Neural plasticity.

[28]  L Simoncini,et al.  Gait abnormalities in minimally impaired multiple sclerosis patients , 1999, Multiple sclerosis.

[29]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[30]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Attentional requirements of walking in spinal cord injured patients compared to normal subjects , 1999, Spinal Cord.

[31]  Steven P. Miller,et al.  Brain Stem Control of Spinal Mechanisms , 1982 .

[32]  M. Ladouceur,et al.  Kinematic Adaptations of Spinal Cord-Injured Subjects during Obstructed Walking , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[33]  V. Dietz,et al.  Obstacle avoidance during human walking: learning rate and cross‐modal transfer , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  V. Dietz,et al.  Long term effects of locomotor training in spinal humans , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[35]  V. Dietz,et al.  Ambulatory capacity in spinal cord injury: significance of somatosensory evoked potentials and ASIA protocol in predicting outcome. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  Lars Weidenhielm,et al.  Kinetic and kinematic characteristics of gait in patients with medial knee arthrosis , 2003, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[37]  PL Dittuno,et al.  Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[38]  J. Ditunno,et al.  Recovery of ambulation in motor-incomplete tetraplegia. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[39]  H Barbeau,et al.  Treadmill walking in incomplete spinal-cord-injured subjects: 1. Adaptation to changes in speed , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[40]  Richard W. Bohannon.  Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[41]  H Barbeau,et al.  Treadmill walking in incomplete spinal-cord-injured subjects: 2. Factors limiting the maximal speed , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[42]  V. Dietz,et al.  Locomotor activity in spinal man , 1994, The Lancet.

[43]  V. Dietz,et al.  The influence of age on learning a locomotor task , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.