Extreme short-term environmental constraints do not update internal models of action as assessed from motor imagery in adults

According to the simulation theory, the internal simulation of a movement (imagined movement, IM) and its execution (actual movement, AM) are based on the same motor representations. The brain uses these representations for controlling action. The specific objective of this study was to investigate the updating process of internal models of action in adults, through massive environmental changes involved by microgravity (0G). 0G has multiple effects on motor control, including short-term adaptations with respect to the planification and performance of actions. However, the effects of 0G on internal representations of action are still largely unknown. To address this issue, thirteen subjects performed first sit-to-stand (STS) and back-to-sit (BTS) tasks, and subsequently had to imagine movement performance in these tasks. The tasks were performed under normogravity (1G) and 0G conditions. Based on durations of actual and IMs, two main results emerged from this study. In 1G, actual and IM's durations were similar. However, in 0G, AM durations were significantly longer than IM durations. Furthermore, IM durations in 0G were similar to the 1G value. These results show that although the planification and execution of action were immediately adapted to the 0G condition, the storage of afferent information was inadequate to recalibrate the predictive model. These results suggest that sudden change in gravity was not considered for updating internal models of action, and that forward model probably required more practice in order to integrate the modification of the sensorial feedback generated by the new environmental constraints.

[1]  K. E. Money,et al.  Visually-induced tilt during parabolic flights , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  L. Young,et al.  M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 2. Visual vestibular tilt interaction in weightlessness , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Marco Schieppati,et al.  Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  T Pozzo,et al.  Similar planning strategies for whole-body and arm movements performed in the sagittal plane , 2003, Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Decety Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate? , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  Charalambos Papaxanthis,et al.  Muscle Fatigue Affects Mental Simulation of Action , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitt's law hold in motor imagery? , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[9]  J. C. Gilhodes,et al.  Proprioceptive information processing in weightlessness , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  J. Paillard A propos de la négligence motrice: issues et perspectives. , 1990 .

[11]  Charalambos Papaxanthis,et al.  Mentally represented motor actions in normal aging II. The influence of the gravito-inertial context on the duration of overt and covert arm movements , 2008, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  J C Gilhodes,et al.  Sensorimotor and perceptual function of muscle proprioception in microgravity. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[13]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  A Berthoz,et al.  Parietal and hippocampal contribution to topokinetic and topographic memory. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  G. Courtine,et al.  Gait-dependent motor memory facilitation in covert movement execution. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  P. Maruff,et al.  Asymmetries between dominant and non-dominanthands in real and imagined motor task performance , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  J. Zacks Neuroimaging Studies of Mental Rotation: A Meta-analysis and Review , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Christine Assaiante,et al.  Postural Adaptation of the Spatial Reference Frames to Microgravity: Back to the Egocentric Reference Frame , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  F. Mast,et al.  Mental transformation abilities in patients with unilateral and bilateral vestibular loss , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  J. Keeler,et al.  Noise in neural networks: thresholds, hysteresis, and neuromodulation of signal-to-noise. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Gentili,et al.  Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Reaching while standing in microgravity: a new postural solution to oversimplify movement control , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Faisal Karmali,et al.  Mental own-body and body-part transformations in microgravity. , 2007, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[26]  L. Craighero,et al.  Electrophysiology of Action Representation , 2004, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[27]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[28]  Aidan Moran,et al.  Measuring Motor Imagery Using Psychometric, Behavioral, and Psychophysiological Tools , 2011, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[29]  Fred W Mast,et al.  Effects of microgravity on cognition: The case of mental imagery. , 2010, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[30]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Marco Schieppati,et al.  Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[32]  Gilles Clément,et al.  Adaptive modifications of postural attitude in conditions of weightlessness , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Comparison of actual and imagined execution of whole-body movements after a long exposure to microgravity , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[35]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.