Recommended Guidelines for Developing, Qualifying, and Implementing Complex In Vitro Models (CIVMs) for Drug Discovery

The pharmaceutical industry is continuing to face high research and development (R&D) costs and low overall success rates of clinical compounds during drug development. There is an increasing demand for development and validation of healthy or disease-relevant and physiological human cellular models that can be implemented in early-stage discovery, thereby shifting attrition of future therapeutics to a point in discovery at which the costs are significantly lower. There needs to be a paradigm shift in the early drug discovery phase (which is lengthy and costly), away from simplistic cellular models that show an inability to effectively and efficiently reproduce healthy or human disease-relevant states to steer target and compound selection for safety, pharmacology, and efficacy questions. This perspective article covers the various stages of early drug discovery from target identification (ID) and validation to the hit/lead discovery phase, lead optimization, and preclinical safety. We outline key aspects that should be considered when developing, qualifying, and implementing complex in vitro models (CIVMs) during these phases, because criteria such as cell types (e.g., cell lines, primary cells, stem cells, and tissue), platform (e.g., spheroids, scaffolds or hydrogels, organoids, microphysiological systems, and bioprinting), throughput, automation, and single and multiplexing endpoints will vary. The article emphasizes the need to adequately qualify these CIVMs such that they are suitable for various applications (e.g., context of use) of drug discovery and translational research. The article ends looking to the future, in which there is an increase in combining computational modeling, artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML), and CIVMs.

[1]  Roland Eils,et al.  Resolving drug effects in patient-derived cancer cells links organoid responses to genome alterations , 2017, bioRxiv.

[2]  Kjell Johnson,et al.  Three-Dimensional Lung Tumor Microenvironment Modulates Therapeutic Compound Responsiveness In Vitro – Implication for Drug Development , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  David B Duignan,et al.  Navigating tissue chips from development to dissemination: A pharmaceutical industry perspective , 2017, Experimental biology and medicine.

[4]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Tales from the crypt: new insights into intestinal stem cells , 2018, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

[5]  Gianni Dal Negro,et al.  Application of complex in vitro models (CIVMs) in drug discovery for safety testing and disease modeling , 2019, Microfluidic Cell Culture Systems.

[6]  J. Collins,et al.  Contributions of microbiome and mechanical deformation to intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammation in a human gut-on-a-chip , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  R. Kamm,et al.  Microfluidics: A new tool for modeling cancer-immune interactions. , 2016, Trends in cancer.

[8]  Raymond R Tice,et al.  FutureTox II: in vitro data and in silico models for predictive toxicology. , 2015, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[9]  G. Dubini,et al.  Human 3D vascularized organotypic microfluidic assays to study breast cancer cell extravasation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Murat Cirit,et al.  Maximizing the impact of microphysiological systems with in vitro-in vivo translation. , 2018, Lab on a chip.

[11]  S. Nik-Zainal,et al.  Use of CRISPR-modified human stem cell organoids to study the origin of mutational signatures in cancer , 2017, Science.

[12]  Darren Finlay,et al.  3-Dimensional Culture Systems for Anti-Cancer Compound Profiling and High-Throughput Screening Reveal Increases in EGFR Inhibitor-Mediated Cytotoxicity Compared to Monolayer Culture Systems , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  Michael Quante,et al.  Three-Dimensional Gastrointestinal Organoid Culture in Combination with Nerves or Fibroblasts: A Method to Characterize the Gastrointestinal Stem Cell Niche , 2015, Stem cells international.

[14]  Harikrishna Narasimhan,et al.  Predicting clinical response to anticancer drugs using an ex vivo platform that captures tumour heterogeneity , 2015, Nature Communications.

[15]  E. Stanley,et al.  Directing human embryonic stem cell differentiation towards a renal lineage generates a self-organizing kidney , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[16]  Dirk Schumacher,et al.  Assay Establishment and Validation of a High-Throughput Screening Platform for Three-Dimensional Patient-Derived Colon Cancer Organoid Cultures , 2016, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[17]  Kyung-Jin Jang,et al.  Duodenum Intestine-Chip for preclinical drug assessment in a human relevant model , 2020, eLife.

[18]  Hans Clevers,et al.  A functional CFTR assay using primary cystic fibrosis intestinal organoids , 2013, Nature Medicine.

[19]  Mulin Jun Li,et al.  Nature Genetics Advance Online Publication a N a Ly S I S the Support of Human Genetic Evidence for Approved Drug Indications , 2022 .

[20]  Ata Mahjoubfar,et al.  Deep Learning in Label-free Cell Classification , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Gail H Deutsch,et al.  In vitro generation of human pluripotent stem cell derived lung organoids , 2015, eLife.

[22]  Mohsen Akbari,et al.  Microfluidic-Based Multi-Organ Platforms for Drug Discovery , 2016, Micromachines.

[23]  D. Ingber,et al.  Microfluidic organs-on-chips , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  Deepak Choudhury,et al.  Engineering Microfluidic Organoid-on-a-Chip Platforms , 2019, Micromachines.

[25]  A Lavecchia,et al.  Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery: a critical review. , 2013, Current medicinal chemistry.

[26]  Jonathan S. Weissman,et al.  Reprogramming human T cell function and specificity with non-viral genome targeting , 2017, Nature.

[27]  Murat Cirit,et al.  Multi-functional scaling methodology for translational pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic applications using integrated microphysiological systems (MPS). , 2017, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[28]  Frank Jacobs,et al.  Comparison of Hepatic 2D Sandwich Cultures and 3D Spheroids for Long-term Toxicity Applications: A Multicenter Study , 2018, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[29]  Murat Cirit,et al.  Integrated Gut and Liver Microphysiological Systems for Quantitative In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Studies , 2017, The AAPS Journal.

[30]  Sean Ekins,et al.  Comparison of Deep Learning With Multiple Machine Learning Methods and Metrics Using Diverse Drug Discovery Data Sets. , 2017, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[31]  Samuel J. Yang,et al.  In Silico Labeling: Predicting Fluorescent Labels in Unlabeled Images , 2018, Cell.

[32]  Jeffrey K. Aronson,et al.  Post-marketing withdrawal of anti-obesity medicinal products because of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review , 2016, BMC Medicine.

[33]  Matthew Loxham,et al.  Cellular crosstalk between airway epithelial and endothelial cells regulates barrier functions during exposure to double‐stranded RNA , 2017, Immunity, inflammation and disease.

[34]  Martin Wehling,et al.  Translatability score revisited: differentiation for distinct disease areas , 2017, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[35]  DA Lauffenburger,et al.  Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Approaches Applied to Microphysiological Systems (MPS): Data Interpretation and Multi-MPS Integration , 2015, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[36]  Louis Scampavia,et al.  A Novel 3-dimensional High Throughput Screening Approach Identifies Inducers of a Mutant KRAS Selective Lethal Phenotype , 2018, Oncogene.

[37]  Wen Feng Lu,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine☆ , 2018, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[38]  Kate Lawrenson,et al.  A three-dimensional microenvironment alters protein expression and chemosensitivity of epithelial ovarian cancer cells in vitro , 2013, Laboratory Investigation.

[39]  Steven C George,et al.  A vascularized and perfused organ-on-a-chip platform for large-scale drug screening applications. , 2017, Lab on a chip.

[40]  Sai Siva Gorthi,et al.  Cytopathological image analysis using deep-learning networks in microfluidic microscopy. , 2017, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[41]  Madeline A. Lancaster,et al.  Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly , 2013, Nature.

[42]  P. Levkin,et al.  Droplet Microarrays: From Surface Patterning to High‐Throughput Applications , 2018, Advanced materials.

[43]  George Q. Daley,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells in disease modelling and drug discovery , 2019, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[44]  Francesco Iorio,et al.  CELLector: Genomics Guided Selection of Cancer in vitro Models , 2018, bioRxiv.

[45]  Jack W Scannell,et al.  When Quality Beats Quantity: Decision Theory, Drug Discovery, and the Reproducibility Crisis , 2016, PloS one.

[46]  Uwe Marx,et al.  Biology-inspired microphysiological system approaches to solve the prediction dilemma of substance testing. , 2016, ALTEX.

[47]  P. Bernardi,et al.  High concordance of drug-induced human hepatotoxicity with in vitro cytotoxicity measured in a novel cell-based model using high content screening , 2006, Archives of Toxicology.

[48]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction , 2014, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[49]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Organ‐on‐Chip Recapitulates Thrombosis Induced by an anti‐CD154 Monoclonal Antibody: Translational Potential of Advanced Microengineered Systems , 2018, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[50]  Nic Fleming,et al.  How artificial intelligence is changing drug discovery , 2018, Nature.

[51]  J. Haycock,et al.  State-of-the-art of 3D cultures (organs-on-a-chip) in safety testing and pathophysiology. , 2014, ALTEX.

[52]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Sequential cancer mutations in cultured human intestinal stem cells , 2015, Nature.

[53]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  3D Cultures of Parkinson's Disease‐Specific Dopaminergic Neurons for High Content Phenotyping and Drug Testing , 2018, Advanced science.

[54]  James C. Pino,et al.  Integrated, High-Throughput, Multiomics Platform Enables Data-Driven Construction of Cellular Responses and Reveals Global Drug Mechanisms of Action. , 2017, Journal of proteome research.

[55]  Hayley E. Francies,et al.  Prospective Derivation of a Living Organoid Biobank of Colorectal Cancer Patients , 2015, Cell.

[56]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Human Organ Chip Models Recapitulate Orthotopic Lung Cancer Growth, Therapeutic Responses, and Tumor Dormancy In Vitro. , 2017, Cell reports.

[57]  Stefan Przyborski,et al.  Advances in 3D cell culture technologies enabling tissue‐like structures to be created in vitro , 2014, Journal of anatomy.

[58]  Michael Hay,et al.  Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[59]  H. Clevers,et al.  Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt–villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche , 2009, Nature.

[60]  R. Locksley,et al.  Cross-Talk between Epithelial Cells and Type 2 Immune Signaling. The Role of IL-25. , 2016, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[61]  David J. Nicholls,et al.  Impact of a five-dimensional framework on R&D productivity at AstraZeneca , 2018, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[62]  R. Fleck,et al.  3D microfluidic liver cultures as a physiological preclinical tool for hepatitis B virus infection , 2018, Nature Communications.

[63]  Woojung Shin,et al.  Pathomimetic modeling of human intestinal diseases and underlying host-gut microbiome interactions in a gut-on-a-chip. , 2018, Methods in cell biology.

[64]  Murat Cirit,et al.  Interconnected Microphysiological Systems for Quantitative Biology and Pharmacology Studies , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[65]  Uwe Marx,et al.  Functional coupling of human pancreatic islets and liver spheroids on-a-chip: Towards a novel human ex vivo type 2 diabetes model , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[66]  Thomas C. Ferrante,et al.  Small airway-on-a-chip enables analysis of human lung inflammation and drug responses in vitro , 2015, Nature Methods.

[67]  T. Singer,et al.  Bioprinted 3D Primary Liver Tissues Allow Assessment of Organ-Level Response to Clinical Drug Induced Toxicity In Vitro , 2016, PloS one.

[68]  Louis Scampavia,et al.  A 1536-Well 3D Viability Assay to Assess the Cytotoxic Effect of Drugs on Spheroids , 2017, SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D.

[69]  Thomas Hankemeier,et al.  Microfluidic 3D cell culture: from tools to tissue models. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[70]  Bin Zhang,et al.  3D Bioprinting: A Novel Avenue for Manufacturing Tissues and Organs , 2019, Engineering.

[71]  Simon Messner,et al.  Utility of spherical human liver microtissues for prediction of clinical drug-induced liver injury , 2017, Archives of Toxicology.

[72]  Dietmar W. Hutmacher,et al.  Bioengineered 3D platform to explore cell-ECM interactions and drug resistance of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[73]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Modeling Human Digestive Diseases With CRISPR-Cas9-Modified Organoids. , 2019, Gastroenterology.

[74]  Takanori Kanai,et al.  Modeling colorectal cancer using CRISPR-Cas9–mediated engineering of human intestinal organoids , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[75]  James P. Freyer,et al.  The Use of 3-D Cultures for High-Throughput Screening: The Multicellular Spheroid Model , 2004, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[76]  Akiko Seki,et al.  Optimized RNP transfection for highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout in primary T cells , 2018, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[77]  M. Ingelman-Sundberg,et al.  Characterization of primary human hepatocyte spheroids as a model system for drug-induced liver injury, liver function and disease , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[78]  Stephen T. Holgate,et al.  Barrier responses of human bronchial epithelial cells to grass pollen exposure , 2012, European Respiratory Journal.

[79]  H. Moriya,et al.  Quantitative nature of overexpression experiments , 2015, Molecular biology of the cell.

[80]  PresnellSharon,et al.  Modeling Liver Biology and the Tissue Response to Injury in Bioprinted Human Liver Tissues , 2018 .

[81]  O. Joseph Trask,et al.  Concerns, challenges and promises of high-content analysis of 3D cellular models , 2018, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[82]  R. Rowntree,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells: opportunities as research and development tools in 21st century drug discovery. , 2010, Regenerative medicine.

[83]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Functional repair of CFTR by CRISPR/Cas9 in intestinal stem cell organoids of cystic fibrosis patients. , 2013, Cell stem cell.

[84]  Daniel C Leslie,et al.  A Human Disease Model of Drug Toxicity–Induced Pulmonary Edema in a Lung-on-a-Chip Microdevice , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[85]  Max A. Horlbeck,et al.  Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation , 2014, Cell.

[86]  Saeed Alqahtani,et al.  In silico ADME-Tox modeling: progress and prospects , 2017, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[87]  R. Lovell-Badge,et al.  Guidelines for the use of cell lines in biomedical research , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.