Consolidated design of the HCPB Breeding Blanket for the pre-Conceptual Design Phase of the EU DEMO and harmonization with the ITER HCPB TBM program

Abstract From 2014 to 2020, the Pre-Conceptual Design phase (PCD) of the EU DEMO has taken place. The activities in the PCD phase differ from past exercises in their strong Systems Engineering methodology, as well as for the pragmatic approach in their technology choices. The Helium Cooled Pebble Bed (HCPB) is one of the 2 candidates as driver blanket for the EU DEMO in the PCD phase. Several design iterations have been required during the PCD phase in order to adjust the design to the current demanding DEMO requirements, to the very challenging systems integration and to the need to keep near-term technologies. To this respect, the design has evolved to a so-called fuel-breeder pin architecture built in single-module segments. The pins are filled with a pebble bed of a ceramic breeder mixture of Li4SiO4 + 35 mol % Li2TiO3 (60% 6Li) and are embedded in prismatic blocks of Be12Ti acting as neutron multiplier. He gas at 8 MPa is used as coolant with a temperature window of 300–520 °C. This architecture has proven to achieve a large tritium breeding performance (≈1.20), a remarkably low plant circulating power (

[1]  R. Knitter,et al.  Li4SiO4 based breeder ceramics with Li2TiO3, LiAlO2 and LiXLaYTiO3 additions, part I: Fabrication , 2017 .

[2]  Marc Kamlah,et al.  Overview of the HCPB Research Activities in EUROfusion , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[3]  S. Kecskes,et al.  Status of the new DEMO HCPB blanket design in the European DEMO studies. , 2013 .

[4]  G. Federici,et al.  European TBM programme: First elements of RoX and technical performance assessment for DEMO breeding blankets , 2020 .

[5]  Rodrigo Antunes,et al.  Tritium extraction technologies and DEMO requirements , 2016 .

[6]  M. Roccella,et al.  Update of electromagnetic loads on HCPB breeding blanked for DEMO 2017 configuration , 2020 .

[7]  Z. Vizvary,et al.  European DEMO first wall shaping and limiters design and analysis status , 2020 .

[8]  S. Ruck,et al.  Evaluation of conservative and innovative manufacturing routes for gas cooled Test Blanket Module and Breeding Blanket First Walls , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[9]  Ulrich Fischer,et al.  Preliminary thermal design and related DEMO relevancy of the EU-HCPB TBM in vertical arrangement , 2010 .

[10]  F. Cismondi,et al.  Analyses of the shielding options for HCPB DEMO blanket , 2020, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[11]  A. Möslang,et al.  Synthesis of Be12Ti compound via arc melting or hot isostatic pressing , 2020 .

[12]  Gandolfo Alessandro Spagnuolo,et al.  Advancements in the Helium-Cooled Pebble Bed Breeding Blanket for the EU DEMO: Holistic Design Approach and Lessons Learned , 2019, Fusion Science and Technology.

[13]  Rosaria Villari,et al.  Neutronics requirements for a DEMO fusion power plant , 2015 .

[14]  Gandolfo Alessandro Spagnuolo,et al.  Development of load specifications for the design of the breeding blanket system , 2020, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[15]  Francisco Hernandez,et al.  A new HCPB breeding blanket for the EU DEMO: evolution, rationale and preliminary performances , 2017 .

[16]  G. Federici,et al.  Preliminary design of EU DEMO helium-cooled breeding blanket primary heat transfer system , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[17]  G. Federici,et al.  Overview of DEMO technology and scenario design activities in Europe , 2018 .

[18]  Pavel Pereslavtsev,et al.  First principles review of options for tritium breeder and neutron multiplier materials for breeding blankets in fusion reactors , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[19]  Jin Hun Park,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Tritium Breeding Ratio Deviations in the DEMO Due to Nuclear Data Uncertainties , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[20]  A. Tarallo,et al.  Progress in the design development of EU DEMO helium-cooled pebble bed primary heat transfer system , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[21]  T. Franke,et al.  Overview of the design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO , 2016 .

[22]  Guangming Zhou,et al.  Nuclear analyses of solid breeder blanket options for DEMO: Status, challenges and outlook , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[23]  Danilo Nicola Dongiovanni,et al.  An enhanced, near-term HCPB design as driver blanket for the EU DEMO , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[24]  Kai Nordlund,et al.  European Research Roadmap to the Realisation of Fusion Energy , 2018 .

[25]  M. Coleman,et al.  Required, achievable and target TBR for the European DEMO , 2020, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[26]  Ulrich Fischer,et al.  Neutronic analyses of the HCPB DEMO reactor using a consistent integral approach , 2014 .

[27]  J. Morris,et al.  Overview over DEMO design integration challenges and their impact on component design concepts , 2018, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[28]  Colin F. McDonald,et al.  Helium turbomachinery operating experience from gas turbine power plants and test facilities , 2012 .

[29]  Gerald Pintsuk,et al.  Overview of the DEMO staged design approach in Europe , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[30]  U. Fischer,et al.  Revision of the EU helium cooled pebble bed blanket for DEMO , 2003, 20th IEEE/NPSS Symposium onFusion Engineering, 2003..

[31]  Masaru Nakamichi,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of advanced neutron multipliers for DEMO blanket , 2016 .

[32]  C. Köhly,et al.  Reactor integration of the helium cooled pebble bed blanket for DEMO , 2005 .

[33]  P. Sardain,et al.  Power plant conceptual studies in Europe , 2007 .

[34]  J. Aubert,et al.  DEMO Breeding Blanket Helium Cooled First Wall design investigation to cope high heat loads , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.

[35]  I. Ricapito,et al.  An overview of the EU breeding blanket design strategy as an integral part of the DEMO design effort , 2019, Fusion Engineering and Design.