Development and validation of a nomogram in survival prediction among advanced breast cancer patients

Background The overall survival (OS) among patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) varies greatly. Although molecular subtype is known as the most important factor in OS differentiation, significant differences in OS among patients with the same molecular subtype still occur, leading to the need for a more accurate prognostic prediction model. This study aimed to develop a prediction model (nomogram) based on current diagnosis and treatment to predict the OS of newly diagnosed ABC patients in China. Methods From the institution’s database, we collected data of 368 ABC patients from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (national hospital) as a training set to establish a nomogram with prognostic risk factors that calculated the predicted probability of survival. Nomograms were independently validated with 278 patients with ABC from two other institutions using the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots and risk group stratifications. Results The initial primary tumor stage, molecular subtype, disease-free survival (DFS), presence of brain metastasis, and the tumor burden of metastasis disease (local recurrence, oligo-metastatic disease, or multiple-metastatic disease) were included in the prognostic nomogram. The nomogram had a C-index of 0.77 and 0.71 in the training and the validation sets, respectively. The nomogram was able to stratify patients into different risk groups, respectively (HR 6.81, 95% CI: 4.69 to 9.89, P<0.001). In the lower risk score group (risk score <11), there was no significant difference between the OS with chemotherapy and hormone therapy (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.47, P=0.48). Conclusions We have constructed a novel prediction nomogram that can guide the physicians to select personalized treatment options. Furthermore, our study is the first to add oligo-metastatic disease and primary endocrine/trastuzumab resistance into the prognostic models.

[1]  M. Goetz,et al.  Abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer: MONARCH 3 updated results in prognostic subgroups , 2021, NPJ breast cancer.

[2]  F. Su,et al.  Development and validation of a novel nomogram for predicting distant metastasis-free survival among breast cancer patients. , 2019, Annals of translational medicine.

[3]  S. O'Reilly,et al.  Atezolizumab and Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  S. Loi,et al.  Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Kwapisz Oligometastatic breast cancer , 2018, Breast Cancer.

[6]  James B. Yu,et al.  Association between prolonged metastatic free interval and recurrent metastatic breast cancer survival: findings from the SEER database , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  L. Collette,et al.  Statistical analysis of patient-reported outcome data in randomised controlled trials of locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  R. Greil,et al.  Cure in metastatic breast cancer , 2018, memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology.

[9]  Chuan Wang,et al.  A nomogram prediction for the survival of patients with triple negative breast cancer , 2018, Oncotarget.

[10]  N S El Saghir,et al.  4th ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)† , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  A. Soran,et al.  Randomized Trial Comparing Resection of Primary Tumor with No Surgery in Stage IV Breast Cancer at Presentation: Protocol MF07-01 , 2018, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  Elizabeth Gourd Pyrotinib shows activity in metastatic breast cancer. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  F. Su,et al.  Development and validation of a nomogram predicting the overall survival of stage IV breast cancer patients , 2017, Cancer medicine.

[14]  M. Goetz,et al.  MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  D. Razavi,et al.  Communication about uncertainty and hope: A randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of a communication skills training program for physicians caring for cancer patients , 2017, BMC Cancer.

[16]  Peng Yuan,et al.  Phase I Study and Biomarker Analysis of Pyrotinib, a Novel Irreversible Pan-ErbB Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  P. Arveux,et al.  Prognostic Factors of Survival among Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer and Impact of Primary or Secondary Nature of Disease on Survival: A French Population‐Based Study , 2017, The breast journal.

[18]  F. Dalenc,et al.  External validation of a published nomogram for prediction of brain metastasis in patients with extra-cerebral metastatic breast cancer and risk regression analysis. , 2017, European journal of cancer.

[19]  P. Maciejewski,et al.  Discussions of Life Expectancy and Changes in Illness Understanding in Patients With Advanced Cancer , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  M. Blettner,et al.  Evaluation of clinical parameters influencing the development of bone metastasis in breast cancer , 2016, BMC Cancer.

[21]  J. J. Kim,et al.  Identifying the potential long-term survivors among breast cancer patients with distant metastasis. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[22]  M. Ellis,et al.  Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus Anastrozole 1 mg for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Analysis From the Phase II FIRST Study , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Jeffrey S. Weinberg,et al.  Validation and Development of a Modified Breast Graded Prognostic Assessment As a Tool for Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Sung-Bae Kim,et al.  Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  X. Pivot,et al.  A prognostic factor index for overall survival in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: an analysis of the ATHENA trial. , 2014, Breast.

[26]  Nur Aishah Taib,et al.  Predicting Survival of De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer in Asian Women: Systematic Review and Validation Study , 2014, PloS one.

[27]  H. Samonigg,et al.  An internally and externally validated prognostic score for metastatic breast cancer: analysis of 2269 patients. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[28]  M. Reblin,et al.  Social support needs: Discordance between home hospice nurses and former family caregivers , 2014, Palliative and Supportive Care.

[29]  C. Swanton,et al.  Integrating molecular mechanisms and clinical evidence in the management of trastuzumab resistant or refractory HER-2⁺ metastatic breast cancer. , 2011, The oncologist.

[30]  M. Stockler,et al.  A nomogram to predict survival time in women starting first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[31]  E. Winer,et al.  International Guidelines for Management of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Can Metastatic Breast Cancer Be Cured? , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  F. Dalenc,et al.  Prospective construction and validation of a prognostic score to identify patients who benefit from third-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in terms of overall survival: the METAL3 Study. , 2015, Contemporary clinical trials.