1 Divide and conquer : how perceptual contrast sensitivity and perceptual learning cooperate in reducing input variation in speech perception

Listeners have to overcome variability of the speech signal that can arise, for example, because of differences in room acoustics, differences in speakers' vocal tract properties, or idiosyncrasies in pronunciation. Two mechanisms that are involved in resolving such variation are perceptually contrastive effects that arise from surrounding acoustic context and lexically guided perceptual learning. Although both processes have been studied in great detail, little attention has been paid to how they operate relative to each other in speech perception. The present study set out to address this issue. The carrier parts of exposure stimuli of a classical perceptual learning experiment were spectrally filtered such that the acoustically ambiguous final fricatives sounded relatively more like the lexically intended sound (Experiment 1) or the alternative (Experiment 2). Perceptual learning was found only in the latter case. The findings show that perceptual contrast effects precede lexically guided perceptual learning, at least in terms of temporal order, and potentially in terms of cognitive processing levels as well.

[1]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  D. Scott Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[4]  A. Samuel,et al.  First Impressions and Last Resorts , 2008, Psychological science.

[5]  J. McQueen,et al.  Positional effects in the lexical retuning of speech perception , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  James M. McQueen,et al.  Phonological abstraction without phonemes in speech perception , 2013, Cognition.

[7]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  The bounds on flexibility in speech perception. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  N. Kraus,et al.  The auditory brainstem is a barometer of rapid auditory learning , 2013, Neuroscience.

[9]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[11]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[12]  Christian E Stilp,et al.  Auditory color constancy: Calibration to reliable spectral properties across nonspeech context and targets , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[13]  L. Holt Temporally Nonadjacent Nonlinguistic Sounds Affect Speech Categorization , 2005, Psychological science.

[14]  C. Fowler,et al.  Compensation for coarticulation: disentangling auditory and gestural theories of perception of coarticulatory effects in speech. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Perceiving vowels from uniform spectra: Phonetic exploration of an auditory aftereffect , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Prelexically-driven perceptual retuning of phoneme boundaries , 2008, INTERSPEECH.

[17]  James M. McQueen,et al.  The Time Course of Perceptual Learning , 2011, ICPhS.

[18]  J. McQueen,et al.  The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  A. Lotto,et al.  Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  N. Cant,et al.  The Cochlear Nucleus: Neuronal Types and Their Synaptic Organization , 1992 .

[21]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  Constraints on the processes responsible for the extrinsic normalization of vowels , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[22]  P. Boersma Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.05) , 2009 .

[23]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: Possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds , 1999, Speech Commun..

[24]  A. Samuel Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  P. Cariani,et al.  Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Are there interactive processes in speech perception? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  A continuum of phonetic adaptation: Evaluating an incremental belief-updating model of recalibration and selective adaptation , 2012, CogSci.

[28]  Keith S. Apfelbaum,et al.  Relative cue encoding in the context of sophisticated models of categorization: Separating information from categorization , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Michael Kiefte,et al.  Sensitivity to change in perception of speech , 2003, Speech Commun..

[30]  A. Weber,et al.  Listeners retune phoneme categories across languages. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  Compensation for vocal tract characteristics across native and non-native languages , 2013, J. Phonetics.

[32]  T. M. Nearey Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  A. Lotto,et al.  Behavioral examinations of the level of auditory processing of speech context effects , 2002, Hearing Research.

[34]  Rochelle S. Newman,et al.  Perceptual normalization for speaking rate III: Effects of the rate of one voice on perception of another , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[35]  J. McQueen,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time (L) , 2006 .

[36]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[37]  Eva Reinisch,et al.  Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories? , 2014, J. Phonetics.

[38]  L. Holt Speech categorization in context: joint effects of nonspeech and speech precursors. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  James M. McQueen,et al.  Perceptual adaptation to segmental and syllabic reductions in continuous spoken Dutch , 2014, J. Phonetics.

[40]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the effects of context on vowel perception , 2012, Brain and Language.

[41]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  Paul A. Luce,et al.  Does perceptual learning in speech reflect changes in phonetic category representation or decision bias? , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  J. McQueen,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Eva Reinisch,et al.  The uptake of spectral and temporal cues in vowel perception is rapidly influenced by context , 2013, J. Phonetics.

[45]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  C. Fowler,et al.  A critical examination of the spectral contrast account of compensation for coarticulation , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  D. Norris,et al.  Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. , 2008, Psychological review.

[48]  A. J. Watkins Central, auditory mechanisms of perceptual compensation for spectral-envelope distortion. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  A Bayesian Belief Updating Model of Phonetic Recalibration and Selective Adaptation , 2011, CMCL@ACL.

[50]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  Listening to different speakers: On the time-course of perceptual compensation for vocal-tract characteristics , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  L. Holt,et al.  Lexically guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  D. Norris,et al.  Perceptual learning in speech , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  A. J. Watkins,et al.  Perceptual compensation for speaker differences and for spectral-envelope distortion. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.