Difference between Maturation Division and Cleavage in Starfish Oocytes: Dependency of Induced Cytokinesis on the Size of the Aster as Revealed by Transplantation of the Centrosome

Using the starfish oocyte and zygote, we investigated the abilities of the centrosome at maturation and cleavage divisions to form the aster and induce cytokinesis, in order to determine differences between these divisions. The transplanted centrosome originated from both maturation and cleavage, induced an additional furrow in cleavage in the recipient cells, but did not induce abnormal polar body formation at maturation. Although it organized an additional aster in the recipient cell in both divisions, a difference in size among asters formed was recognized. Therefore, mitotic asters were stabilized with hexylene glycol in order to measure their radius and clarify this difference. The mean radius (14.4 μm) of the first meiotic aster was significantly smaller than that (20.4 μm) of the aster at the first cleavage. The transplanted cleavage centrosome formed as small an aster as the recipient's own at maturation divisions. When zygotes were briefly treated with colcemid so that the zygotes could not perform cytokinesis but did perform karyokinesis, the size of aster became the same as that in meiosis. These results prove that although any centrosome functions as a microtubule organizing center independent of its origin, the size of the resultant aster decides whether or not cytokinesis would be induced.

[1]  Y. Hamaguchi,et al.  Mitotic apparatus formation and cleavage induction by micromanipulation of the nucleus and centrosome: the centrosome forms a spindle together with only the chromosomes at a short distance. , 1992, Experimental cell research.

[2]  K. Kyozuka,et al.  Chromosomal behavior in starfish (Asterina pectinifera) zygotes under the effect of aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA polymerase. , 1991, Experimental cell research.

[3]  T. Arai,et al.  Change in the heterogeneous distribution of tubulin isotypes in mitotic microtubules of the sea urchin egg by treatment with microtubule depolymerizing or stabilizing drugs. , 1991, Cell structure and function.

[4]  S. Nemoto,et al.  Ultrastructural Studies on the Behavior of Centrioles during Meiosis of Starfish Oocytes , 1990 .

[5]  Y. Masui,et al.  Cytostatic factor (CSF) activity in cytosols extracted from Xenopus laevis eggs. , 1990, Experimental cell research.

[6]  G. Woude,et al.  The c-mos proto-oncogene product is a cytostatic factor responsible for meiotic arrest in vertebrate eggs , 1989, Nature.

[7]  T. Miki-Noumura,et al.  Effect of hexyleneglycol on meiotic division of starfish oocytes (Advances in Cell Division Research) , 1988 .

[8]  A. Picard,et al.  Release of mature starfish oocytes from interphase arrest by microinjection of human centrosomes , 1987, Nature.

[9]  R. Rappaport,et al.  Division of constricted and urethane-treated sand dollar eggs: a test of the polar stimulation hypothesis. , 1984, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[10]  S. Nemoto,et al.  ARTIFICIAL PARTHENOGENESIS IN STARFISH EGGS: PRODUCTION OF PARTHENOGENETIC DEVELOPMENT THROUGH SUPPRESSION OF POLAR BODY FORMATION BY METHYLXANTHINES , 1984 .

[11]  H. Sakai,et al.  The Mitotic Apparatus with Unusually Many Microtubules from Sea Urchin Eggs Treated by Hexyleneglycol , 1983, Development, growth & differentiation.

[12]  R. Kuriyama,et al.  Aster formation in sand dollar eggs by microinjection of calcium buffers and centriolar complexes isolated from starfish sperm. , 1982, Experimental cell research.

[13]  Y. Masui,et al.  Cytostatic factor and chromosome behavior in early development , 1980 .

[14]  M. Berns,et al.  Continuation of mitosis after selective laser microbeam destruction of the centriolar region , 1977, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  G. Borisy,et al.  The pericentriolar material in Chinese hamster ovary cells nucleates microtubule formation , 1977, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  T. Miki-Noumura Studies on the de novo formation of centrioles: aster formation in the activated eggs of sea urchin. , 1977, Journal of cell science.