Exploring Shared Measurement Properties and Score Comparability Between Two Versions of the Supports Intensity Scale

This study examined similarities and differences in measurement properties and score comparability of the Supports Intensity Scale–Adult Version (16–64 years) and the Supports Intensity Scale–Children’s Version (5–16 years). Data were collected from 142 adolescents with intellectual disability with both versions of the Supports Intensity Scale. Data analyses indicated clear alignment of the specific set of items across parallel activity domains, as well as support for score comparability across two assessments. This suggests the two versions of Supports Intensity Scale can be used with confidence with transition-aged students to assess their support needs and inform supports planning, depending on the purpose of assessment. Implications and future directions for research and practice are discussed.

[1]  T. Brown.  Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, 2nd ed. , 2015 .

[2]  Yves Lachapelle,et al.  Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. , 2009, Intellectual and developmental disabilities.

[3]  Susan B. Palmer,et al.  The Supports Intensity Scale–Children's Version: Preliminary Reliability and Validity , 2014 .

[4]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[5]  Lyman L. Dukes,et al.  How to Complete a Summary of Performance for Students Exiting to Postsecondary Education , 2007 .

[6]  R. Schalock,et al.  A Leadership Guide for Today's Disabilities Organizations: Overcoming Challenges and Making Change Happen , 2012 .

[7]  T. Little,et al.  Examining Underlying Relationships Between the Supports Intensity Scale–Adult Version and the Supports Intensity Scale–Children’s Version , 2017 .

[8]  T. Little,et al.  Orthogonalizing Through Residual Centering , 2013 .

[9]  R. Schalock,et al.  Models of Disability, Quality of Life, and Individualized Supports: Implications for Professional Practice in Intellectual Disability , 2010 .

[10]  Stephanie N. DeSpain,et al.  Assessment and Planning in K-12 Schools: A Social- Ecological Approach , 2014 .

[11]  M. Wehmeyer,et al.  Supports Intensity Scale–-Children’s Version , 2018 .

[12]  Developmental Disabilities,et al.  Intellectual disability : definition, classification, and systems of supports , 2010 .

[13]  P. Sitlington,et al.  Transition Assessment: The Position of the Division on Career Development and Transition , 1997 .

[14]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  M. Pipan,et al.  Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports 11th ed. , 2012 .

[16]  Marc J. Tassé,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Supplemental Protection and Advocacy Scale of the Supports Intensity Scale , 2014 .

[17]  Todd D Little,et al.  Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one. , 2013, Psychological methods.