The role of embryonic origins and suture proximity in repair of cranial bone

The cranial sutures are proposed to be a stem cell niche, harbouring skeletal stem cells (SSCs) that are directly involved in development, homeostasis, and healing. Like the craniofacial bones, the sutures are formed from both mesoderm and neural crest. During cranial repair, neural crest cells have been proposed to be key players; however, neural crest contributions to the sutures are not well defined, and the relative importance of suture proximity is unclear. Here, we combine calvarial wounding experiments with genetically labelled mouse models to demonstrate that suture proximity predicts the efficiency of cranial repair. Furthermore, we define the neural crest-mesoderm boundary within the sutures and demonstrate that Gli1+ and Axin2+ SSCs are present in all calvarial sutures examined. We propose that the position of the defect determines the availability of neural crest-derived progenitors, which appear to be a key element in the repair of calvarial defects. Summary statement This study provides a new examination of the embryonic origins of cranial sutures in mouse. Using genetic lineage labelling, we identify specific contributions of neural crest cells and associated skeletal stem cells during repair of calvarial wounds. This is extremely relevant considering recent findings regarding the role of suture-residing stem cells.

[1]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Cranial Suture Regeneration Mitigates Skull and Neurocognitive Defects in Craniosynostosis , 2021, Cell.

[2]  A. Grigoriadis,et al.  The osteogenic potential of the neural crest lineage may contribute to craniosynostosis , 2018, bioRxiv.

[3]  A. Grigoriadis,et al.  Calvarial Suture-Derived Stem Cells and Their Contribution to Cranial Bone Repair , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[4]  Charles P. Lin,et al.  Postnatal Calvarial Skeletal Stem Cells Expressing PRX1 Reside Exclusively in the Calvarial Sutures and Are Required for Bone Regeneration , 2017, Stem cell reports.

[5]  W. Hsu,et al.  Stem cells of the suture mesenchyme in craniofacial bone development, repair and regeneration , 2016, Nature Communications.

[6]  T. Ho,et al.  Abstract 5: The Suture Provides a Niche for Mesenchymal Stem Cells of Craniofacial Bones , 2015 .

[7]  M. Longaker,et al.  Integration of Multiple Signaling Regulates through Apoptosis the Differential Osteogenic Potential of Neural Crest-Derived and Mesoderm-Derived Osteoblasts , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  R. Nusse,et al.  Developmental stage and time dictate the fate of Wnt/β-catenin-responsive stem cells in the mammary gland. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[9]  M. Longaker,et al.  Activation of FGF Signaling Mediates Proliferative and Osteogenic Differences between Neural Crest Derived Frontal and Mesoderm Parietal Derived Bone , 2010, PloS one.

[10]  M. Longaker,et al.  Different endogenous threshold levels of Fibroblast Growth Factor-ligands determine the healing potential of frontal and parietal bones. , 2010, Bone.

[11]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Y. Saga,et al.  Cell lineage in mammalian craniofacial mesenchyme , 2008, Mechanisms of Development.

[13]  L. Luo,et al.  A global double‐fluorescent Cre reporter mouse , 2007, Genesis.

[14]  K. Nakashima,et al.  Transcriptional mechanisms in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[15]  A. McMahon,et al.  Inactivation of the beta-catenin gene by Wnt1-Cre-mediated deletion results in dramatic brain malformation and failure of craniofacial development. , 2001, Development.

[16]  M. Longaker,et al.  Regional Differentiation of Cranial Suture‐Associated Dura Mater In Vivo and In Vitro: Implications for Suture Fusion and Patency , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  A. McMahon,et al.  Modification of gene activity in mouse embryos in utero by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre recombinase , 1998, Current Biology.

[18]  Hong-Xiang Liu,et al.  Contribution of cranial neural crest cells to mouse skull development. , 2017, The International journal of developmental biology.

[19]  M. Urata,et al.  Sutures Possess Strong Regenerative Capacity for Calvarial Bone Injury. , 2016, Stem cells and development.

[20]  Luca Wurfel,et al.  Principles Of Tissue Engineering , 2016 .

[21]  S. Iseki,et al.  Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault. , 2002, Developmental biology.

[22]  Y Fujiwara,et al.  Activation of EGFP expression by Cre-mediated excision in a new ROSA26 reporter mouse strain. , 2001, Blood.