Simulation and comparison between fixed and sliding-pressure strategies in parabolic-trough solar power plants with direct steam generation

Abstract Direct steam generation in parabolic-trough solar collectors is a promising technology that can improve the efficiency of solar thermal power plants. In this technology, water is heated and evaporated through the solar field to feed a steam Rankine cycle or an industrial thermal process. Regarding its application for electricity production, two main methods are commonly considered to regulate the steam pressure at the turbine inlet: fixed and sliding-pressure. In addition, the sliding-pressure method allows two different versions: constant and variable pressure in the condenser. This study aims to simulate the behaviour of a solar thermal power plant with direct steam generation applying the proposed strategies, by comparing their annual performance in terms of electricity production. To this end, a quasi-dynamic model able to address transient conditions with low computational resources has been applied. This model has been developed in the TRNSYS software environment and reproduces the behaviour of both the solar field and the power block of a 38.5 MW e solar thermal power plant. The results of this analysis demonstrate that the use of sliding-pressure strategies for steam pressure regulation in solar plants with direct steam generation is more advantageous in terms of net electricity production than the fixed-pressure method.

[1]  M. Eickhoff,et al.  Applied research concerning the direct steam generation in parabolic troughs , 2003 .

[2]  Jan Fabian Feldhoff,et al.  Experiences with Direct Steam Generation at the Kanchanaburi Solar Thermal Power Plant , 2012 .

[3]  S. Kandlikar.  A General Correlation for Saturated Two-Phase Flow Boiling Heat Transfer Inside Horizontal and Vertical Tubes , 1990 .

[4]  Eduardo Zarza,et al.  Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications , 2010 .

[5]  M. Valdés,et al.  Solar multiple optimization for a solar-only thermal power plant, using oil as heat transfer fluid in the parabolic trough collectors , 2009 .

[6]  Magnus Genrup,et al.  Improved load control for a steam cycle combined heat and power plant , 2010 .

[7]  Markus Eck,et al.  Saturated steam process with direct steam generating parabolic troughs , 2006 .

[8]  Eduardo Zarza,et al.  Optical and thermal performance of large-size parabolic-trough solar collectors from outdoor experiments: A test method and a case study , 2014 .

[9]  Tobias Hirsch,et al.  A systematic comparison on power block efficiencies for CSP plants with direct steam generation , 2014 .

[10]  Lin Ma,et al.  The Influence of Overlap Degree Research on Nozzle Governing Characteristic , 2013 .

[11]  R. Bayón,et al.  Simulation and assessment of operation strategies for solar thermal power plants with a thermocline storage tank , 2014 .

[12]  Loreto Valenzuela,et al.  Yield Analysis of a Power Plant with Parabolic-Trough Collectors and Direct Steam Generation (DSG) Using a Quasi-Dynamic Simulation Model in TRNSYS , 2016 .

[13]  A. Stodola.  Steam and gas turbines , 1927 .

[14]  Loreto Valenzuela,et al.  A quasi-dynamic simulation model for direct steam generation in parabolic troughs using TRNSYS , 2016 .

[15]  Jan Fabian Feldhoff,et al.  Comparative system analysis of direct steam generation and synthetic oil parabolic trough power plants with integrated thermal storage , 2012 .

[16]  E. Camacho,et al.  Control concepts for direct steam generation in parabolic troughs , 2005 .