The use of computer games as an educational tool: identification of appropriate game types and game elements

Playing games is an important part of our social and mental development. This research was initiated to identify the game type most suitable to our teaching environment and to identify game elements that students found interesting or useful within the different game types. A group of twenty students played four commercial games (SimIsle, Red Alert, Zork Nemesis and Duke Nukem 3D). Results suggest that students prefer 3D-adventure (Zork Nemesis) and strategy (Red Alert) games to the other types (“shoot-em-up”, simulation) with Zork Nemesis ranked as the best. Students rated game elements such as logic, memory, visualisation and problem solving as the most important game elements. Such elements are integral to adventure games and are also required during the learning process. We present a model that links pedagogical issues with game elements. The game space contains a number of components, each encapsulates specific abstract or concrete interfaces. Understanding the relationship between educational needs and game elements will allow us to develop educational games that include visualisation and problem solving skills. Such tools could provide sufficient stimulation to engage learners in knowledge discovery, while at the same time developing new skills.

[1]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  H. Lips,et al.  Gender differences and similarities in attitudes toward computers , 1989 .

[3]  D. Leutner Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: Effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support , 1993 .

[4]  Lisa Gualtieri Implications of computer games for system design , 1990, INTERACT.

[5]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Games and the Design of Human‐Computer Interfaces , 1994 .

[6]  Joseph Betz Computer Games: Increase Learning in an Interactive Multidisciplinary Environment , 1995 .

[7]  Diane J. Grayson,et al.  A holistic approach to preparing disadvantaged students to succeed in tertiary science studies. Part II. Outcomes of the Science Foundation Programme , 1996 .

[8]  D. Norman The psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[9]  Rod Rivers The role of games and cognitive models in the understanding of complex dynamic systems , 1990, INTERACT.

[10]  M. Lepper,et al.  A desire to be taught: Instructional consequences of intrinsic motivation , 1992 .

[11]  D. Norman The psychology of everyday things", Basic Books Inc , 1988 .

[12]  Joella Gipson Girls and Computer Technology: Barrier or Key?. , 1997 .

[13]  A. T. Cheska,et al.  The anthropology of sport : an introduction , 1989 .

[14]  Lisa Neal Implications of computer games for system design , 1990 .

[15]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Engines for Education , 1995 .

[16]  Katherine Canada,et al.  The technological gender gap: Evidence and recommendations for educators and computer-based instruction designers , 1991 .

[17]  M. Lévesque Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[18]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games , 1996 .

[19]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Personal computer adventure games: their structure, principles, and applicability for training , 1997, DATB.

[20]  John M. Carroll,et al.  The adventure of getting to know a computer , 1982, Computer.

[21]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games , 1982, CHI '82.

[22]  Nancy Roberts Simulation Gaming: A Critical Review. , 1976 .

[23]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  What Makes Things Fun to Learn? A Study of Intrinsically Motivating Computer Games. , 1981 .