Relocating Routines: The Role of Improvisation in Offshore Implementation of Software Processes

Offshored Software and IT-enabled Services have grown spectacularly over the last decade, particularly from India (McKinsey & Nasscom, 2005; Nasscom, 2007). In western economies, while domestic outsourcing won acceptance from 1980s, offshored outsourcing has assumed increasing importance since the late nineties (Hirschheim, Heinzl, & Dibbern, 2006). Global outsourcing could be regarded as a component of the ongoing phenomenon of globalization (Friedman, 2005). Global outsourcing or offshoring involves transfer of work from its original locale within organizational boundaries or at a domestic firm, to a location at a considerable distance. In a general sense, such transfers are a core component of Globalization. The well known sociologist Anthony Giddens, for example, considers time–space distantiation and disembedding mechanisms as the major features modernity and globalization (Giddens, 1990). Such process transfers however, need to confront significant complexities since they involve work transfers across differences or gaps in five dimensions – geographical distance, time zone differences, governance differences, cultural differences and infrastructural differences (van Fenema, 2002). Because of these complexities, disembedding processes from locales where they have earlier been performed to new locations is not in itself an uncomplicated and routine process. There could be considerable risk of failures. We argue in this paper however, that a creative and effective use of resources of the new environment provides scope for major improvements and gains. High levels of quality and productivity reported from India (McKinsey & Nasscom; Nasscom, 2005) point to the fact such gains have been obtained in many cases. We consider Improvisation , which may be defined as creative problem solving that is grounded in the realities at hand, as essential for successful work relocation . In this paper we present two cases of global companies setting up centers in India. While creativity as a value is prized by both organizations, in confronting a new context, organizational approach to improvisation differs leading to different outcomes. We review the literature on Improvisation in Sect. 2. Research approach is outlined in Sect. 3. We present two cases – one of a British and the second of an American multinational commencing work in their Indian software subsidiary in

[1]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[2]  M. Cunha,et al.  Towards a Theory of Organizational Improvisation: Looking Beyond the Jazz Metaphor , 2003 .

[3]  Jorgen P. Bansler,et al.  Improvisation in Action: Making Sense of IS Development in Organizations , 2003 .

[4]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Information Systems Outsourcing: Enduring Themes, New Perspectives and Global Challenges , 2006 .

[5]  Eric M. Eisenberg,et al.  Jamming Transcendence Through Organizing , 1990 .

[6]  G. Walsham Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context , 2001 .

[7]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Synching or Sinking: Global Software Outsourcing Relationships , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[8]  Ken Kamoche,et al.  Minimal Structures: From Jazz Improvisation to Product Innovation , 2001 .

[9]  B. Nicholson,et al.  Global IT Outsourcing: Software Development across Borders , 2003 .

[10]  K. Weick,et al.  Introductory Essay : Improvisation As a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[11]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development , 1998 .

[12]  Peter J. Frost,et al.  The Organization Science Jazz Festival : Improvisationas a Metaphor for Organizing , 1998 .

[13]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[14]  Paul C. van Fenema,et al.  Coordination and Control of Globally Distributed Software Projects , 2002 .

[15]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[16]  Tore Dybå Improvisation in Small Software Organizations , 2000, IEEE Software.

[17]  Nick Bontis,et al.  E‐improvisation: collaborative groupware technology expands the reach and effectiveness of organizational improvisation , 2002 .

[18]  João Vieira da Cunha,et al.  Managing improvisation in cross cultural virtual teams , 2001 .

[19]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods , 2000 .

[20]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[21]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Notes on improvisation and time in organizations , 1999 .

[22]  M. Cunha,et al.  Organizational improvisation: what, when, how, and why , 1999 .

[23]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  Profiles And Critiques In Social Theory , 1982 .

[24]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Situated Action: A Symbolic Interpretation , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  A. Giddens The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[26]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[27]  Brad Hartfield,et al.  Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction , 1988, TOIS.

[28]  D. Simonton Creativity as Blind Variation and Selective Retention : Is the Creative Process Darwinian ? , 2022 .

[29]  Anil Gaba,et al.  Coda : Creativity and Improvisation in Jazzand Organizations: Implications Fororganizational Learning , 1998 .

[30]  M. Hatch Exploring the Empty Spaces of Organizing: How Improvisational Jazz Helps Redescribe Organizational Structure , 1999 .

[31]  Jacques Desrosiers,et al.  The Process of Improvisation , 1998 .

[32]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[33]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[34]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Todd J. Hostager,et al.  Jazz as a Process of Organizational Innovation , 1988 .

[36]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .