Three-Dimensional Finite Element Formulation and Scalable Domain Decomposition for High Fidelity Rotor Dynamic Analysis

Abstract : This paper implements and analyzes a dual-primal iterative substructuring method, that is parallel and scalable, for the solution of a three-dimensional finite element dynamic analysis of helicopter rotor blades. The finite element analysis is developed using isoparametric hexahedral brick elements. Particular emphasis is placed on the formulation of the inertial terms that are unique to rotary wing structures. The scalability of the solution procedure is studied using two prototype problems { one for steady hover (symmetric) and one for transient forward flight (non-symmetric) - both carried out on up to 48 processors. In both hover and forward flight, a linear speed-up is observed with number of processors, up to the point of substructure optimality. Substructure optimality and the range of linear speed-up are shown to depend both on the problem size as well as a corner based global coarse problem selection. An increase in problem size extends the linear speed-up range up to the new substructure optimality. A superior coarse problem selection extends the optimality to a higher number of processors. The method also scales with respect to problem size. The key conclusion is that a three-dimensional finite element analysis of a rotor can be carried out in a fully parallel and scalable manner. The careful selection of substructure corner nodes, that are used to construct the global coarse problem, is the key to extending linear speed-up to as high a processor number as possible, thus minimizing the solution time for a given problem size.

[1]  J. H. Argyris,et al.  Modern fuselage analysis and the elastic aircraft : basic theory , 1963 .

[2]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  On Timoshenko-like modeling of initially curved and twisted composite beams , 2002 .

[3]  Y. Saad,et al.  Krylov Subspace Methods on Supercomputers , 1989 .

[4]  G. Stewart,et al.  Reorthogonalization and stable algorithms for updating the Gram-Schmidt QR factorization , 1976 .

[5]  Gérard Meurant Multitasking the conjugate gradient method on the CRAY X-MP/48 , 1987, Parallel Comput..

[6]  H. Saunders Book Reviews : NUMERICAL METHODS IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS K.-J. Bathe and E.L. Wilson Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ , 1978 .

[7]  Andrea Toselli,et al.  Domain decomposition methods : algorithms and theory , 2005 .

[8]  C. Farhat,et al.  A scalable dual-primal domain decomposition method , 2000, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl..

[9]  Clark R. Dohrmann,et al.  Convergence of a balancing domain decomposition by constraints and energy minimization , 2002, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl..

[10]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[11]  Barry F. Smith,et al.  Domain Decomposition: Parallel Multilevel Methods for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations , 1996 .

[12]  V. Berdichevskiĭ Variational-asymptotic method of constructing a theory of shells , 1979 .

[13]  J. S. Przemieniecki,et al.  Joining of complex substructures by the matrix force method. , 1966 .

[14]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The finite element method in structural and continuum mechanics, numerical solution of problems in structural and continuum mechanics , 1967 .

[15]  John K. Reid,et al.  The Multifrontal Solution of Indefinite Sparse Symmetric Linear , 1983, TOMS.

[16]  J. Pasciak,et al.  The Construction of Preconditioners for Elliptic Problems by Substructuring. , 2010 .

[17]  Barry Smith,et al.  Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations , 1997 .

[18]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[19]  Bruce M. Irons,et al.  A frontal solution program for finite element analysis , 1970 .

[20]  Paul H. Denke,et al.  A GENERAL DIGITAL COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF STATICALLY INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES , 1962 .

[21]  Inderjit Chopra,et al.  Review of Rotor Loads Prediction with the Emergence of Rotorcraft CFD , 2007 .

[22]  P. Tallec Domain decomposition methods in computational mechanics , 1994 .

[23]  Jacques Periaux,et al.  On Domain Decomposition Methods , 1988 .

[24]  Wayne Johnson,et al.  Requirements for Next Generation Comprehensive Analysis of Rotorcraft , 2008 .

[25]  M. Rozložník,et al.  The loss of orthogonality in the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization process , 2005 .

[26]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics , 2013 .

[27]  O. Widlund,et al.  FETI and Neumann--Neumann Iterative Substructuring Methods: Connections and New Results , 1999 .

[28]  Jennifer A. Scott,et al.  An efficient out‐of‐core multifrontal solver for large‐scale unsymmetric element problems , 2009 .

[29]  J. S. Przemieniecki Matrix Structural Analysis of Substructures , 1963 .

[30]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Nonlinear Composite Beam Theory , 2006 .

[31]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Theory of Anisotropic Thin-Walled Beams , 2000 .

[32]  I. P. Smirnov,et al.  Optimal control of a dynamic system with random parameters under incomplete information , 1979 .

[33]  J. Mandel,et al.  An algebraic theory for primal and dual substructuring methods by constraints , 2005 .

[34]  D. Rixen,et al.  FETI‐DP: a dual–primal unified FETI method—part I: A faster alternative to the two‐level FETI method , 2001 .