Von Glaserfeld‘s Radical Constructivism: A Critical Review

We explore Ernst von Glaserfeld‘s radical constructivism, its criticisms, and our own thoughts on what it promises for the reform of science and mathematics teaching. Our investigation reveals that many criticisms of radical constructivism are unwarranted; nevertheless, in its current cognitivist form radical constructivism may be insufficient to empower teachers to overcome objectivist cultural traditions. Teachers need to be empowered with rich understandings of philosophies of science and mathematics that endorse relativist epistemologies; for without such they are unlikely to be prepared to reconstruct their pedagogical practices. More importantly, however, is a need for a powerful social epistemology to serve as a referent for regenerating the culture of science education. We recommend blending radical constructivism with Habermas‘ ’theory of communicative action‘ to provide science teachers with a moral imperative for adopting a constructivist epistemology.

[1]  E. Glasersfeld.  Steps In The Construction Of “Others” And “Reality”: A Study In Self-Regulation , 1986 .

[2]  P. Taylor.  COLLABORATING TO RECONSTRUCT TEACHING: THE INFLUENCE OF RESEARCHER BELIEFS , 1991 .

[3]  R. Driver,et al.  Theories-in-Action: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Study of Students' Conceptual Frameworks in Science , 1983 .

[4]  M. Kline.  Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty , 1982 .

[5]  E. Glasersfeld.  Learning as Constructive Activity , 1983 .

[6]  P. Taylor.  Constructivist approaches to science teaching , 1999 .

[7]  T. Mccarthy,et al.  The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas , 1978 .

[8]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests , 1972 .

[9]  Ernst von Glasersfeld,et al.  Constructivism reconstructed: A reply to suchting , 1992 .

[10]  Mark L. Johnson.  The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[11]  T. Kuhn.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[12]  Peter Charles Taylor,et al.  Metaphors as global markers for teachers' beliefs about the nature of science , 1995 .

[13]  G. Wheatley.  Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning , 1991 .

[14]  E. Glasersfeld.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF LANGUAGE AS PURPOSIVE BEHAVIOR , 1976 .

[15]  Ernst von Glasersfeld.  Abstraction, Re-Presentation, and Reflection, an Interpretation of Experience and Piaget's Approach. , 1991 .

[16]  H. Cairns,et al.  A Scientific Theory of Culture and Other Essays , 1945, Africa.

[17]  Paul Ernest.  Constructivism, the psychology of learning, and the nature of mathematics: Some critical issues , 1993 .

[18]  E. Glasersfeld.  An Introduction to Radical Constructivism , 1981 .

[19]  Peter Charles Taylor,et al.  The effect of culture on the learning of science in non‐western countries: the results of an integrated research review , 1995 .

[20]  Ernst von Glasersfeld.  Reading, Understanding, and Conceptual Situations. , 1971 .

[21]  M. A. Clements,et al.  Some pluses and minuses of radical constructivism in mathematics education , 1992 .

[22]  Paul Ernest,et al.  The Philosophy of Mathematics Education , 2003 .

[23]  E. Glasersfeld.  Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching , 1989 .

[24]  P. Cobb.  Where Is the Mind? Constructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development , 1994 .

[25]  Ernst von Glasersfeld.  Constructivism reconstructed: A reply to suchting , 1992 .

[26]  E. Glasersfeld.  An Exposition of Constructivism: Why Some Like it Radical , 1991 .

[27]  Ernst von Glasersfeld,et al.  Environment and Communication. , 1988 .

[28]  P. Cobb,et al.  Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. , 1993 .

[29]  E. Glasersfeld.  Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position. , 1989 .

[30]  Andrzej Rapaczyński,et al.  The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. , 1981 .

[31]  Thomas Tymoczko.  New directions in the philosophy of mathematics : an anthology , 1998 .

[32]  Ernst von Glasersfeld,et al.  Signs, communication, and language , 1974 .