论文信息 - The initial field trials of DSM-5: new blooms and old thorns.

The initial field trials of DSM-5: new blooms and old thorns.

Three articles in this issue detail the process and results of reliability tests for proposed DSM-5 diagnoses and cross-diagnosis symptom domains. The editorial highlights the good reliability of borderline personality disorder and relates the questionable reliability of major depressive disorder to its heterogeneity. The editorial is also available in Spanish, Traditional Chinese, and Simplified Chinese.

[1] S. Guze,et al. Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: its application to schizophrenia. , 1970, The American journal of psychiatry.

[2] Emily A. Kuhl,et al. DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part I: study design, sampling strategy, implementation, and analytic approaches. , 2013, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3] R. DeRubeis,et al. Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis. , 2010, JAMA.

[4] Helena C Kraemer,et al. DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part III: development and reliability testing of a cross-cutting symptom assessment for DSM-5. , 2013, The American journal of psychiatry.

[5] A. Beck,et al. Personality disorders in DSM-5. , 2010, The American journal of psychiatry.

[6] Emily A. Kuhl,et al. DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses. , 2013, The American journal of psychiatry.

[7] Maurizio Fava,et al. Difference in treatment outcome in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression: a STAR*D report. , 2008, The American journal of psychiatry.