Modeling Distributive and Integrative Negotiations. Review and Revised Characterization

The development of user-friendly negotiation support systems enabled negotiators to obtain advice directly from the system rather than via an intermediary. The emergence of e-commerce and the development of negotiating software agents further contributed to the automation of negotiation activities. These developments exposed inconsistencies in the descriptions of integrative and distributed negotiations. They also showed limitations of the existing modeling methods. These methods were designed to support negotiation experts who themselves had to make distinctions between distributive and integrative processes. Inconsistent descriptions and the lack of formal models that could be embedded in systems often contribute to a mechanical approach to negotiations compounding the difficulty in the design and development of software that can be used in real-life situations. The contradictions between the characteristics of integrative and distributive negotiations are discussed and assumptions for these two types as well as qualitative differences between them are proposed. Negotiation literature suggests that it is the negotiators' perception of the problem that leads to the their focus on either distributive or integrative conflict resolution. This may be the case for negotiations that are not supported with software. In case of the latter it is the design principles and information processing that that differentiates these two types of negotiations. Negotiation representation based on the information requirements for different types of conflict is proposed.

[1]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Wise choices : decisions, games, and negotiations , 1996 .

[2]  Judi McLean Parks Negotiation analysis. (Ed.) H. Peyton Young , 1994 .

[3]  T. M. Tripp,et al.  Discrepant Values and Measures of Negotiator Performance , 2000 .

[4]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  Organizational Decision Support Systems , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[5]  Melvin F. Shakun Negotiation processes : modeling frameworks and information technology , 1996 .

[6]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an , 1997 .

[7]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce : A Survey , 1998 .

[8]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  A Formal Basis for Negotiation Support System Research , 1998 .

[9]  G. Kersten,et al.  Rational inefficient compromises in negotiation , 1999 .

[10]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Identifying Pareto-optimal settlements for two-party resource allocation negotiations , 1996 .

[11]  Robert H. Guttman,et al.  Cooperative vs. Competitive Multi-Agent Negotiations in Retail Electronic Commerce , 1998, CIA.

[12]  G. E. Kersten,et al.  Support for group decisions and negotiations , 1997 .

[13]  C. Mitchell Negotiation as Problem Solving: Challenging the Dominant Metaphor , 1999 .

[14]  Markku Kuula,et al.  A decision support approach for negotiation with an application to agricultural income policy negotiations , 1995 .

[15]  J. Rubin,et al.  Negotiation , 1983 .

[16]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Automated negotiation , 1999, CACM.

[17]  Kim,et al.  Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement , 1986 .

[18]  Elaine B. Hyder,et al.  Knowledge Matters: The Effect of Tactical Descriptions on Negotiation Behavior and Outcome , 1996 .

[19]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  LOSE-LOSE AGREEMENTS IN INTERDEPENDENT DECISION MAKING , 1996 .

[20]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Multiple-issue auction and market algorithms for the world wide web , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  Sunil Gupta Modeling integrative, multiple issue bargaining , 1989 .

[22]  Howard Raiffa Lectures on negotiation analysis , 1997 .

[23]  John Rohrbaugh,et al.  Negotiation and design: Supporting resource allocation decisions through analytical mediation , 1996 .

[24]  William Ury,et al.  Getting past no: negotiating your way from confrontation to cooperation , 1993 .

[25]  G. E. Kersten,et al.  Modelling business negotiations for electronic commerce , 1998 .

[26]  R. Fisher,et al.  Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in , 1981 .

[27]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Compromise in Negotiation: Exploiting Worth Functions over States , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[28]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Negotiator Rationality and Negotiator Cognition: The Interactive Roles of Prescriptive and Descriptive Research , 1991 .

[29]  R. Fisher,et al.  Beyond Machiavelli: Tools for Coping with Conflict , 1994 .

[30]  James K. Sebenius,et al.  Negotiation analysis: a characterization and review , 1992 .

[31]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Support for Group Decisions and Negotiations An Overview , 1997 .

[32]  M. Bazerman Judgement in Managerial Decision Making , 2003 .

[33]  J. Nash THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[34]  Farrokh Alemi,et al.  A Demonstration of Methods for Studying Negotiations Between Physicians and Health Care Managers , 1990 .

[35]  William Ury,et al.  Getting Past No , 1991 .

[36]  Benjamin N. Grosof,et al.  Toward a Declarative Language for Negotiating Executable Contracts , 2003 .

[37]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[38]  Gerald B. Wetlaufer The Limits of Integrative Bargaining , 1996 .

[39]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Are All E-Commerce Negotiations Auctions? , 2000, COOP.

[40]  Melvin F. Shakun Introduction to the special issue on negotiation processes: Modeling frameworks and information technology , 1996 .

[41]  K. Sycara Problem Restructuring in Negotiation , 1991 .

[42]  S. Zionts,et al.  Generating Pareto Solutions in a Two-Party Setting: Constraint Proposal Methods , 1999 .

[43]  D. Clyman Measures of Joint Performance in Dyadic Mixed-Motive Negotiations , 1995 .

[44]  E KerstenGregory,et al.  WWW-based negotiation support , 1999 .

[45]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Restructurable representations of negotiation , 1991 .

[46]  Robert Ladner,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Conflict , 1973 .

[47]  A. Ingham,et al.  Aspiration Levels in Bargaining and Economic Decision Making , 1984 .

[48]  TeichJeffrey,et al.  Generating Pareto Solutions in a Two-Party Setting , 1999 .

[49]  William L. Ury,et al.  Getting to Yes , 2019, Boy on the Bridge.

[50]  L. Thompson,et al.  The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator , 1997 .

[51]  Stan Matwin,et al.  Genetic algorithms approach to a negotiation support system , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[52]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Trading Financial Derivatives on the Web—An Approach Towards Automating Negotiations on OTC Markets , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[53]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  An analytic basis for decision support in negotiations , 1991 .

[54]  R. Walton,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. , 1966 .

[55]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Rational agents, contract curves, and inefficient compromises , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[56]  James K. Sebenius,et al.  The Manager as Negotiator , 1987 .

[57]  C W Holsapple,et al.  Negotiation support systems: roots, progress and needs , 1991, Inf. Syst. J..

[58]  Tung X. Bui,et al.  Evaluating negotiation support systems: a conceptualization , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.