Information Technology, Network Structure, and Competitive Action

Researchers in competitive dynamics have demonstrated that firms that carry out intense, complex, and heterogeneous competitive actions exhibit better performance. However, there is a need to understand factors that enable firms to undertake competitive actions. In this study, we focus on two antecedents of competitive behavior of firms: (1) access to network resources and (2) use of information technology (IT). We argue that while network structure provides firms with the opportunity to tap into external resources, the extent to which they are actually exploited depends on firms' IT-enabled capability. We develop a theoretical model that examines the relationships between IT-enabled capability, network structure, and competitive action. We test the model using secondary data, about 12 major automakers over 16 years from 1988 to 2003. We find that network structure rich in structural holes has a positive direct effect on firms' ability to introduce a greater number and a wider range of competitive actions. However, the effect of dense network structure is contingent on firms' IT-enabled capability. Firms benefit from dense network structure only when they develop a strong IT-enabled capability. Our results suggest that IT-enabled capability plays both a substitutive role, when firms do not have advantageous access to brokerage opportunities, and a complementary role, when firms are embedded in dense network structure, in the relationship between network structure and competitive actions.

[1]  Theresa S. Cho,et al.  The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves , 1996 .

[2]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Organizational Information Processing, Competitive Responses, and Performance in the U.S. Domestic Airline Industry , 1991 .

[3]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[4]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  P. Weill,et al.  Building IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility , 2002 .

[6]  Eric Overby,et al.  Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[8]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  The impact of performance distress on aggressive competitive behavior: a reconciliation of conflicting views , 2002 .

[9]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[10]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[11]  R. Gulati.  Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[12]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[13]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[14]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[15]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Information Processing View of Organizations: An Exploratory Examination of Fit in the Context of Interorganizational Relationships , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Dovev Lavie.  Alliance Portfolios and Firm Performance: A Study of Value Creation and Appropriation in the U.S. Software Industry , 2007 .

[17]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Hypercompetition in a Multimarket Environment: The Role of Strategic Similarity and Multimarket Contact in Competitive De-Escalation , 1996 .

[18]  L. Mises,et al.  Human Action: A Treatise on Economics , 1949 .

[19]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  IT and business process outsourcing: the knowledge potential , 2004 .

[21]  Danny Miller,et al.  The simplicity of competitive repertoires : An empirical analysis , 1996 .

[22]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  CEO compensation and firm competitive behavior: Empirical evidence from the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 2005 .

[23]  UzziBrian,et al.  Relational Embeddedness and Learning , 2003 .

[24]  R. Burt.  Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2005 .

[25]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Speed, Stealth, and Selective Attack: How Small Firms Differ From Large Firms in Competitive Behavior , 1995 .

[26]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Performance Effects of Information Technology Synergies in Multibusiness Firms , 2006, MIS Q..

[27]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information Technology and Productivity: A Review of the Literature , 1996, Adv. Comput..

[28]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Rivalry Between Multinational Enterprises: An Event History Approach , 2007 .

[29]  W. Powell.  Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis , 1991 .

[30]  Danny Miller,et al.  SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITIVE INERTIA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1994 .

[31]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  J OrlikowskiWanda,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations , 2004 .

[33]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Effect of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  F. Hayek.  Individualism and Economic Order , 1949 .

[36]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  “Austrian” and Industrial Organization Perspectives on Firm-level Competitive Activity and Performance , 1996 .

[37]  Geoffrey G. Bell,et al.  Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance , 2005 .

[38]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  Strategy as action : industry rivalry and coordination , 1997 .

[39]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  Competitive Dynamics in Electronic Networks: A Model and the Case of Interorganizational Systems , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[40]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[41]  J. Ross,et al.  Beyond the Business Case: New Approaches to IT Investment , 2002 .

[42]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  Multimarket Contact and Resource Dissimilarity: A Competitive Dynamics Perspective , 2000 .

[43]  Christina Soh,et al.  How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis , 1995, ICIS.

[44]  B. Baltagi,et al.  Econometric Analysis of Panel Data , 2020, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[45]  H. Bernard,et al.  Data Management and Analysis Methods , 2000 .

[46]  James L. McKenney,et al.  Airline Reservations Systems: Lessons from History , 1988, MIS Q..

[47]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[48]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Understanding the Alliance Data , 2008 .

[49]  Robert W. Blanning,et al.  Synthesis and Decomposition of Processes in Organizations , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Service-Oriented Architecture and Organizational Integration: An Empirical Study of IT-Enabled Sustained Competitive Advantage , 2007, ICIS.

[51]  M. Dell.  The power of virtual integration: an interview with Dell Computer's Michael Dell. Interview by Joan Magretta. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[52]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  The linkage between IOS use and competitive action: a competitive dynamics perspective , 2007, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[53]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[55]  R. Gulati,et al.  Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks , 2000 .

[56]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[57]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  Digital Systems, Partnership Networks, and Competition: The Co-Evolution of IOS Use and Network Position as Antecedents of Competitive Action , 2008, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[58]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[59]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[61]  Israel M. Kirzner.  Competition and Entrepreneurship , 1973 .

[62]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[63]  W. Goodenough,et al.  Human Group , 1951, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[64]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: a Structural Embeddedness Perspective , 2001 .

[65]  Ellen Christiaanse,et al.  Beyond Sabre: An Empirical Test of Expertise Exploitation in Electronic Channels , 2002, MIS Q..

[66]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[67]  R. Sanchez.  Strategic flexibility in product competition , 1995 .

[68]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology , 1995, DATB.

[69]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[70]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[71]  Martin Gargiulo,et al.  Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital , 2000 .

[72]  Javier Gimeno,et al.  Reciprocal threats in multimarket rivalry: staking out ‘spheres of influence’ in the U.S. airline industry , 1999 .

[73]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses , 1992 .

[74]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[75]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[76]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[77]  Max Chen.  Competitor analysis and interfirm riva-lry: toward a theoretical integration , 1996 .

[78]  Danny Miller,et al.  Nonconformity in Competitive Repertoires: A Sociological View of Markets , 1996 .

[79]  Walter J. Ferrier,et al.  The Role of Competitive Action in Market Share Erosion and Industry Dethronement: A Study of Industry Leaders and Challengers , 1999 .

[80]  D. Krackhardt.  Simmelian Ties: Super Strong and Sticky , 1998 .

[81]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[82]  Walter J. Ferrier,et al.  Competitive repertoire simplicity and firm performance: The moderating role of top management team heterogeneity , 2004 .

[83]  Walter J. Ferrier.  Navigating the Competitive Landscape: The Drivers and Consequences of Competitive Aggressiveness , 2001 .

[84]  R. Burt.  The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[85]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[86]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[87]  Lawrence R. Jauch,et al.  Structured Content Analysis of Cases: A Complementary Method for Organizational Research , 1980 .

[88]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[89]  Charles F. Hockett,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.