Changes in corneal biomechanics following different keratoplasty techniques

Purpose: To evaluate corneal biomechanics with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY) after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Subjects and methods: Sixty-three eyes of 63 patients were included in this prospective comparative study. Patients were divided into 3 groups: the first included 21 eyes of normal subjects (control group); the second included 21 eyes with PK; the third included 21 eyes with DALK. ORA was performed 2 months postoperatively for all patients. Results: Both mean corneal hysteresis (CH) and mean corneal resistance factor (CRF) were significantly lower in the PK group than both the DALK group and matched controls. No statistically significant difference was found between mean CH and mean CRF between the DALK group and matched controls Conclusion: Corneas after PK have weaker biomechanical properties than normal corneas. DALK preserves the biomechanical strength of the corneas to almost normal values.

[1]  E. Feretis,et al.  Association between corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in glaucomatous and non‐glaucomatous eyes , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica.

[2]  Y. Chan,et al.  Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  K. Shimizu,et al.  Factors affecting corneal hysteresis in normal eyes , 2008, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[4]  S. López-Plandolit,et al.  Queratoplastia penetrante protegida: técnica quirúrgica y respuesta del endotelio , 2008 .

[5]  David Touboul,et al.  Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  J. Durán,et al.  [Protected penetrating keratoplasty: surgical technique and endothelial response]. , 2008, Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia.

[7]  Aachal Kotecha,et al.  What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? , 2007, Survey of ophthalmology.

[8]  Sunil Shah,et al.  The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. , 2006, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[9]  Ahmed Elsheikh,et al.  Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  A. Guirao.  Theoretical elastic response of the cornea to refractive surgery: risk factors for keratectasia. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[11]  D. Luce.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  R. Castroviejo.  Keratoplasty in treatment of keratoconus. , 1949, Archives of ophthalmology.