How video articles are cited, the case of JoVE: Journal of Visualized Experiments

Journal of Visualized Experiments (JoVE) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes video articles. In order to find out about the impact of video articles and how they are used in other journal articles, a random sample of 500 articles that cited at least one JoVE article was drawn and citation content analysis was conducted to find out about reasons for citation, frequency of citation mentions, location of citation and any relation between in-text citation characteristics and times cited. The results showed that JoVE articles are mostly cited for methodological reasons (72.4%) and in method sections of articles (53.2%). The context of 44.1% of citation mentions included phrases such as ‘as previously described’. More than a third (38.8%) of citations to JoVE articles were self-citations. JoVE articles that were self-cited were more likely to have a larger number of citation mentions, be cited for different reasons and in different sections of citing articles. They were also more likely to have more authors. The majority of the articles (75.6%) were mentioned only once in the citing articles. The median impact factor (MIF) of the journals of citing articles was higher than MIF of any Web of Science subject category, indicating that the citing articles were mostly from journals with relatively high impact factors. Overall, JoVE articles play an important role in transparency and transfer of methodologies and processes in research.

[1]  Guo Zhang,et al.  Content‐based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  D. Cases,et al.  How can we investigate citation behavior?: a study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000 .

[3]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[4]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[5]  Daniel Lemire,et al.  Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics , 1989, Scientometrics.

[7]  Mikhail V. Blagosklonny Librarians against scientists: Oncotarget’s lesson , 2018, Oncotarget.

[8]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  The role of trust and authority in the citation behaviour of researchers , 2015, Inf. Res..

[9]  M. White,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Citing Behavior: Contributions, Criteria, and Metalevel Documentation Concerns , 1997, The Library Quarterly.

[10]  Farrokh Habibzadeh,et al.  Journal weighted impact factor: A proposal , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[11]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  A macro study of self-citation , 2003, Scientometrics.

[12]  Donald Owen Case,et al.  How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The invariant distribution of references in scientific articles , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  Why and where Wikipedia is cited in journal articles? , 2013, J. Sci. Res..

[15]  Shenmeng Xu,et al.  Communicating Scientific Video Articles on Twitter: An Initial Exploration of JoVE Publications , 2017, ISSI.

[16]  Paolo Malighetti,et al.  Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions , 2017, Research Policy.

[17]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Does research with statistics have more impact? The citation rank advantage of structural equation modeling , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Staša Milojević,et al.  Citation content analysis (CCA): A framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  The Recurrence of Citations within a Scientific Article , 2015, ISSI.

[20]  Matias Pasquali,et al.  Video in science , 2007, EMBO reports.

[21]  Dangzhi Zhao,et al.  Functions of Uni- and Multi-citations: Implications for Weighted Citation Analysis , 2017, J. Data Inf. Sci..

[22]  Zhigang Hu,et al.  Understanding multiply mentioned references , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[23]  Erik. Stengler,et al.  Online science videos: an exploratory study with major professional content providers in the United Kingdom , 2016 .

[24]  Chao Lu,et al.  Understanding the impact change of a highly cited article: a content-based citation analysis , 2017, Scientometrics.

[25]  Susan Bonzi,et al.  Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others , 1991, Scientometrics.

[26]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[27]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  A Community of Curious Souls: An Analysis of Commenting Behavior on TED Talks Videos , 2014, PloS one.

[28]  Troy Jones,et al.  YouTube: Educational Potentials and Pitfalls , 2011 .

[29]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[30]  Ying Ding,et al.  The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[31]  Yimei Zhu,et al.  Academics' Active and Passive Use of YouTube for Research and Leisure , 2017 .

[32]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  OPEN PEN ACCESS CCESS , 2008 .

[33]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[34]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Does self-citation pay? , 2007, Scientometrics.

[35]  Guang Yu,et al.  A study on the citation situation within the citing paper: citation distribution of references according to mention frequency , 2017, Scientometrics.

[36]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  A quasi-quantitative citation model , 1987, Scientometrics.

[37]  Min Song,et al.  Exploring characteristics of highly cited authors according to citation location and content , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  Martin Buxton,et al.  Using categorisations of citations when assessing the outcomes from health research , 2005, Scientometrics.

[39]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The role of online videos in research communication: A content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[40]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Web citations in patents: Evidence of technological impact? , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Xiaojun Wan,et al.  WL‐index: Leveraging citation mention number to quantify an individual's scientific impact , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[42]  G. Gilbert Referencing as Persuasion , 1977 .

[43]  Henry Voos,et al.  Are All Citations Equal? Or, Did We Op. Cit. Your Idem?. , 1976 .

[44]  Christopher Cayari The YouTube Effect: How YouTube Has Provided New Ways to Consume, Create, and Share Music , 2011 .

[45]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Where are citations located in the body of scientific articles? A study of the distributions of citation locations , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[46]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Scientists Popularizing Science: Characteristics and Impact of TED Talk Presenters , 2013, PloS one.

[47]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Scholars on soap boxes: Science communication and dissemination in TED videos , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..