Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences*

Abstract  We investigated preferences for climate change mitigation policies and factors contributing to higher levels of policy support. The sample was comprised of 316 Michigan and Virginia residents, all of whom completed mail surveys. Of the eight policies proposed to reduce the burning of fossil fuels, respondents overwhelmingly indicated they would not support a gas tax, while support was highest for shifting subsidies away from fossil fuels and towards sustainable energy strategies. With the exception of taxes on gasoline and “gas guzzlers,” a majority of respondents supported all other mitigation policies. Multivariate analyses revealed that greater trust in environmentalists and less trust in industry, greater recognition of the consequences of climate change, higher income, being black, and older age were predictive of greater policy support. Personal values (e.g., altruism), future orientation, and political affiliation were strong predictors of policy support but only indirectly via worldviews and environmental beliefs.

[1]  James L. Arbuckle,et al.  Full Information Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Data , 1996 .

[2]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[3]  P. Mohai,et al.  Is There a "Race" Effect on Concern for Environmental Quality? , 1998 .

[4]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys , 1999 .

[5]  A. McCright,et al.  Politics and Environment in America: Partisan and Ideological Cleavages in Public Support for Environmentalism , 2001 .

[6]  R. Dunlap.  Lay Perceptions of Global Risk , 1998 .

[7]  Aaron M. McCright,et al.  Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy , 2003 .

[8]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[9]  A. Henry.  Public perceptions of global warming , 2000 .

[10]  James D. Wright,et al.  The Political Consciousness of Post-Industrialism@@@The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. , 1978 .

[11]  Sigrid Roßteutscher,et al.  Explaining politics: An empirical test of competing value measures , 2004 .

[12]  M. van vugt,et al.  Who Cares about the Environmental Impact of Cars? , 2004 .

[13]  Timothy C. Earle,et al.  Social Trust , 1995 .

[14]  Anthony A Leiserowitz,et al.  American Risk Perceptions: Is Climate Change Dangerous? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  WORDS, DEEDS, AND THE PERCEPTION OF CONSEQUENCES AND RESPONSIBILITY IN ACTION SITUATIONS ' , 1968 .

[16]  K. Schwab,et al.  Public understanding , 1994, Nature.

[17]  Joseph R. Hopper,et al.  Recycling as Altruistic Behavior , 1991 .

[18]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Predictors of Recycling Behavior: An Application of a Modified Health Belief Model1 , 1997 .

[19]  B. Thompson,et al.  EFFECTS OF SAMPLE SIZE, ESTIMATION METHODS, AND MODEL SPECIFICATION ON STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING FIT INDEXES , 1999 .

[20]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .

[21]  Moti Nissani.  Media Coverage of the Greenhouse Effect , 1999 .

[22]  W. Kempton.  Public understanding of global warming , 1991 .

[23]  S. Schwartz.  Normative Influences on Altruism , 1977 .

[24]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  A Brief Inventory of Values , 1998 .

[25]  Glenn S. Johnson,et al.  Environmentalism and Public Policy: Environmental Justice: Grassroots Activism and Its Impact on Public Policy Decision Making , 2000 .

[26]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence , 1980 .

[27]  F. Buttel.  Age and Environmental Concern: A Multivariate Analysis , 1979 .

[28]  E. Uyeki,et al.  Diffusion of Pro-Environment Attitudes? , 2000 .

[29]  D. Dillman,et al.  Increasing Mail Questionnaire Response: A Four State Comparison , 1974 .

[30]  Robert E. O'Connor,et al.  Who Wants to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2002 .

[31]  P. Stern.  New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[32]  P. Stern,et al.  Personal and contextual influences on househould energy adaptations. , 1985 .

[33]  Robert D. Bullard,et al.  Environmental Justice: Grassroots Activism and Its Impact on Public Policy Decision Making , 2000 .

[34]  Steven R. Brechin,et al.  Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climatic change and the Kyoto Protocol: the US versus the world? , 2003 .

[35]  Stefan Saccbi.  The Dimensionality of Postmaterialism: An Application of Factor Analysis to Ranked Preference Data , 1998 .

[36]  R. J. Bord,et al.  Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change , 1999 .

[37]  P. Schultz,et al.  Reframing Environmental Messages to be Congruent with American Values , 2022 .

[38]  R. Inglehart.  Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies , 1997 .

[39]  D. Davidson,et al.  Gender and Environmental Risk Concerns , 1996 .

[40]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[41]  Robert J. Brulle,et al.  Media’s social construction of environmental issues: focus on global warming – a comparative study , 2003 .

[42]  W. Hendee.  The decline of deference: the political context of risk communication. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[43]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Risk perception and trust: Challenges for facility siting , 1996 .

[44]  C. Bean,et al.  POLARIZED PRIORITIES OR FLEXIBLE ALTERNATIVES? DIMENSIONALITY IN INGLEHART'S MATERIALISM—POSTMATERIALISM SCALE , 1994 .

[45]  Shirley Laska,et al.  The Changing Face of the Environmental Coalition , 1992 .

[46]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Toward A Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values , 1987 .

[47]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[48]  S. L. Klineberg,et al.  Demographic predictors of environmental concern : It does make a difference how it's measured : Research on the environment , 1998 .

[49]  John A. Glaser,et al.  Environmental values , 2008 .

[50]  D. Boninger,et al.  The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. , 1994 .

[51]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action: Attitude Formation Toward Emergent Attitude Objects1 , 1995 .

[52]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[53]  M. G. Morgan,et al.  What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models , 1994 .

[54]  P. Schultz,et al.  Reframing Environmental Messages to be Congruent with , 2003 .

[55]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Definitions of conflict and the legitimation of resources: The case of environmental risk , 1989 .

[56]  Robert E. O'Connor,et al.  Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives , 1998 .

[57]  J. M. Hines,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[58]  M. Perlmutter,et al.  Future time perspective and life events across adulthood. , 1995, The Journal of general psychology.

[59]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[60]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  New Information and Social Trust: Asymmetry and Perseverance of Attributions about Hazard Managers , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[61]  Aaron M. McCright,et al.  Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims , 2000 .

[62]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[63]  R. J. Bord,et al.  The gender gap in environmental attitudes : The case of perceived vulnerability to risk : Research on the environment , 1997 .

[64]  J. Joireman,et al.  Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.