Reflective design documentation

Interaction design researchers doing research through design face not only the wicked problems in the practice of doing interaction design, but also the wicked problems that exist in the practice of doing research. In this paper we discuss the use of a tool developed for the specific purpose of documenting design projects and prompting reflection about design events as part of doing research through design. Based on cases lasting from nine to thirteen months we address specific benefits and challenges that we have encountered while employing the tool. Challenges concern roles and responsibilities, lack of routines, determining what to document, and finding the right level of detail. Benefits include support of shared reflection and discussion in on-going projects, the development, refining, and reflection upon research questions, scaffolding longitudinal and cross-project studies. Moreover, the benefits derived from entering design materials and other kinds of artefacts into a tool may not be achieved until must later, for instance when writing research publications.

[1]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[2]  Victoria Hoban,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner , 2013 .

[3]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Dynamics of research through design , 2012, DIS '12.

[4]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Design and Complexity: Research into Practice , 2004 .

[5]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Inspiration card workshops , 2006, DIS '06.

[6]  Kim Halskov,et al.  MAPS FOR DESIGN REFLECTION , 2008 .

[7]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  Thoughtful interaction design , 2004 .

[8]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Integrating different perspectives on design rationale: Supporting the emergence of design rationale from design communication , 1997, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[9]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[10]  Raymond McCall,et al.  Rationale Management in Software Engineering , 2006 .

[11]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology , 2004 .

[12]  Jintae Lee,et al.  Design Rationale Systems: Understanding the Issues , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[13]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[14]  Johan Redström,et al.  Lab, Field, Gallery, and Beyond , 2008 .

[15]  Janet E. Burge,et al.  Design rationale: Researching under uncertainty , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[16]  Kim Halskov,et al.  CAVI: an interaction design research lab , 2011, INTR.

[17]  Michael E. Atwood,et al.  Effective Design Rationale: Understanding the Barriers , 2006 .

[18]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research , 2008 .

[19]  John Zimmerman,et al.  An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[20]  D. Schoen The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .