Bridging the Gap Between the Language of Science and the Language of School Science Through the Use of Adapted Primary Literature

In this paper we make the case that the language of school science and the language of science are widely divergent. We trace the divergence to a simple view of reading that prevails not only in science education but in most of schooling. Based upon the importance of language in science and the role of language in capturing the essential nature of scientific reasoning, we conclude that conceiving of reading as a form of inquiry could assist in bringing the two languages more into alignment. We recommend the use of adapted primary literature as one curriculum and instruction innovation that can be useful in illustrating the nature of reading as inquiry.

[1]  Greg Myers,et al.  Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and popular science texts , 1991 .

[2]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy , 2003 .

[3]  G. Myers,et al.  Textbooks and the sociology of scientific knowledge , 1992 .

[4]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice , 1992 .

[5]  Tom Miller,et al.  Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. , 1997 .

[6]  F. Suppe.  The Structure of a Scientific Paper , 1998, Philosophy of Science.

[7]  Betty Samraj.  Functional approaches to written text: classroom applications , 2001 .

[8]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Teaching scientific inquiry : recommendations for research and implementation , 2008 .

[9]  S. Norris,et al.  The Anatomy of Junior High School Science Textbooks: An Analysis of Textual Characteristics and a Comparison to Media Reports of Science , 2003 .

[10]  Patricia M. Rowell,et al.  Description Is Not Enough: Scaffolding Children's Explanations. , 2002 .

[11]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  Interpreting popular reports of science: what happens when the reader's world meets the world on paper? , 1999 .

[12]  R C Ewing,et al.  Nanocrystalline zirconia can be amorphized by ion irradiation. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[13]  Anat Yarden,et al.  Text genre as a factor in the formation of scientific literacy , 2005 .

[14]  S. Norris,et al.  Assessment Techniques Corresponding to Scientific Texts in Commercial Reading Programs: Do They Promote Scientific Literacy?. , 2009 .

[15]  Anat Yarden,et al.  Teaching a Biotechnology Curriculum Based on Adapted Primary Literature , 2008 .

[16]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Language and Literacy in Science Education , 2001 .

[17]  Madge T. Craig,et al.  Index of Science Reading Awareness: An Interactive-Constructive Model, Test Verification, and Grades 4-8 Results. , 1998 .

[18]  C. Brammer,et al.  Communication Patterns of Engineers , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[19]  D. Newton,et al.  Do Primary School Science Books for Children Show a Concern for Explanatory Understanding? , 2002 .

[20]  Linda M. Phillips,et al.  Young Readers' Inference Strategies in Reading Comprehension , 1988 .

[21]  L. Brain.  Structure of the scientific paper. , 1965, British medical journal.

[22]  Danielle J. Ford,et al.  Representations of science within children's trade books , 2006 .

[23]  J. Beamish,et al.  Adsorption and desorption of helium in aerogels , 2003 .

[24]  Connie A. Korpan,et al.  University Students' Interpretation of Media Reports of Science and its Relationship to Background Knowledge, Interest, and Reading Difficulty , 2003 .

[25]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science , 1994 .

[26]  Douglas P. Newton,et al.  Do Teachers Support Causal Understanding through their Discourse when Teaching Primary Science , 2000 .