Research Use as Learning: The Case of Fundamental Change in School District Central Offices

Districts nationwide have launched efforts to fundamentally change their central offices to support improved teaching and learning for all students and are turning to research for help. The research provides promising guides but is challenging to use. What happens when central offices try? We explored that question in six districts using sociocultural learning theory to analyze 124 interviews, 499.25 observation hours, and approximately 300 documents. We found that central office administrators varied in their appropriation of five research-based ideas between and somewhat within districts. Prior knowledge and assistance from intermediary organizations proved necessary but not sufficient to support appropriation absent internal leaders who taught others how to use the research. These findings elaborate research use as a learning process that may require particular, intensive internal leadership.

[1]  I.,et al.  Street-Level Bureaucracy Revisited : Frontline District Central-Office Administrators as Boundary Spanners in Education Policy Implementation , 2022 .

[2]  Meredith I. Honig.  District Central Office Leadership as Teaching , 2012 .

[3]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[4]  B. Levin.  Leadership for evidence-informed education , 2010 .

[5]  S. Barley.  Images of Imaging: Notes on Doing Longitudinal Field Work , 1990 .

[6]  S. Anderson,et al.  No one way: Differentiating school district leadership and support for school improvement , 2012 .

[7]  C. Coburn,et al.  Evidence, Interpretation, and Persuasion: Instructional Decision Making at the District Central Office , 2009, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[8]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[9]  Janet H. Chrispeels,et al.  Linking the Central Office and Its Schools for Reform , 2010 .

[10]  Meredith I. Honig.  Building Policy from Practice: District Central Office Administrators' Roles and Capacity for Implementing Collaborative Education Policy , 2003 .

[11]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided discovery in a community of learners. , 1994 .

[12]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[13]  D. Holland.  Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds , 1998 .

[14]  Heather Zavadsky.  School Turnarounds: The Essential Role of Districts , 2012 .

[15]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[16]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[17]  Kara S. Finnigan,et al.  A bridge between worlds: understanding network structure to understand change strategy , 2010 .

[18]  R. Gallimore,et al.  Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context , 1988 .

[19]  Larysa Lysenko,et al.  Use of Research-Based Information by School Practitioners and Determinants of Use: A Review of Empirical Research. , 2012 .

[20]  P. Cobb,et al.  Cognitive and Situated Learning Perspectives in Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[21]  James P. Spillane.  Cognition and Policy Implementation: District Policymakers and the Reform of Mathematics Education , 2000 .

[22]  Peter Smagorinsky,et al.  The Twisting Path of Concept Development in Learning to Teach , 2003, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[23]  Meredith I. Honig,et al.  Central Office Leadership in Principal Professional Learning Communities: The Practice beneath the Policy. , 2014 .

[24]  Victoria Hoban,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner , 2013 .

[25]  E. Farley-Ripple.  Research Use in School District Central Office Decision Making , 2012 .

[26]  Noel M. Tichy,et al.  The Cycle of Leadership: How Great Leaders Teach Their Companies to Win , 2002 .

[27]  M. Stein,et al.  Research and Practice in Education: Building Alliances, Bridging the Divide , 2010 .

[28]  Meredith I. Honig,et al.  Central Office Transformation for District-wide Teaching and Learning Improvement , 2010 .

[29]  Sheila W. Valencia,et al.  Appropriating Tools for Teaching English: A Theoretical Framework for Research on Learning to Teach , 1999, American Journal of Education.

[30]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[31]  M. Copland.  Leadership of Inquiry: Building and Sustaining Capacity for School Improvement , 2003 .

[32]  Richard F. Elmore,et al.  Instructional Rounds in Education: A Network Approach to Improving Teaching and Learning , 2009 .

[33]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[34]  Meredith I. Honig.  The New Middle Management: Intermediary Organizations in Education Policy Implementation , 2004 .

[35]  B. Rogoff,et al.  Development through participation in sociocultural activity. , 1995, New directions for child development.

[36]  Kara S. Finnigan,et al.  The Ebb and Flow of Social Network Ties Between District Leaders Under High-Stakes Accountability , 2011 .

[37]  C. Coburn,et al.  Conceptions of Evidence Use in School Districts: Mapping the Terrain , 2006, American Journal of Education.

[38]  Meredith I. Honig.  No Small Thing: School District Central Office Bureaucracies and the Implementation of New Small Autonomous Schools Initiatives , 2009 .

[39]  L. A. Hill,et al.  Managers Managing: The Workings of an Administrative System. , 1990 .

[40]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[41]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[42]  James G. March,et al.  Explorations in Organizations , 2008 .

[43]  B. Levin.  To know is not enough: research knowledge and its use , 2013 .

[44]  Tina Trujillo.  The Politics of District Instructional Policy Formation , 2013 .