IS SPACE NECESSARY? INTERFERENCE COMPETITION AND LIMITS TO BIODIVERSITY

A single trade-off between competitive ability and mortality has been shown to support an arbitrarily large number of species in models of interference competition in spatially structured populations. We show that this results not from spatial structure, but instead from the assumption that a small difference in mortality translates into a large difference in competitive ability. We present graphical criteria for recognizing functions that support one, two, or more species. High levels of coexistence in models of this form depend on a steep slope or a discontinuous second derivative of the function relating mortality to competitiveness. These criteria are identical to those in models of interference competition that lack explicit spatial structure.

[1]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Snowy Owl Predation on Short-Eared Owls , 1977 .

[2]  M. Westoby,et al.  Game-Theoretical Evolution of Seed Mass in Multi-Species Ecological Models , 1997 .

[3]  F. Adler.  The Balance of Terror: An Alternative Mechanism for Competitive Trade‐Offs and Its Implications for Invading Species , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[4]  S. Levin.  Community Equilibria and Stability, and an Extension of the Competitive Exclusion Principle , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade‐off: a sowing experiment , 1999 .

[6]  S. Geritz.  Evolutionarily Stable Seed Polymorphism and Small-Scale Spatial Variation in Seedling Density , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[7]  D. Tilman.  Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[8]  A. Hastings.  Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space , 1980 .

[9]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  The theory of limiting similarity , 1983 .

[10]  G. Tullock,et al.  Competitive Exclusion. , 1960, Science.

[11]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Adaptive Dynamics of Pathogen–Host Interactions , 2002 .

[12]  J. Banks.  DO IMPERFECT TRADE‐OFFS AFFECT THE EXTINCTION DEBT PHENOMENON? , 1997 .

[13]  M. Nowak,et al.  Superinfection, metapopulation dynamics, and the evolution of diversity. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  J. Metz,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of seed size and seedling competitive ability. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[15]  M. Westoby,et al.  Population dynamics in sessile organisms: some general results from three seemingly different theory-lineages , 1997 .

[16]  F R Adler,et al.  Evolution of virulence: a unified framework for coinfection and superinfection. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.