Parameter concentrations in quantum approximate optimization

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) has become a cornerstone of contemporary quantum applications development. In QAOA, a quantum circuit is trained -- by repeatedly adjusting circuit parameters -- to solve a problem. Several recent findings have reported parameter concentration effects in QAOA and their presence has become one of folklore: while empirically observed, the concentrations have not been defined and analytical approaches remain scarce, focusing on limiting system and not considering parameter scaling as system size increases. We found that optimal QAOA circuit parameters concentrate as an inverse polynomial in the problem size, providing an optimistic result for improving circuit training. Our results are analytically demonstrated for variational state preparations at $p=1,2$ (corresponding to 2 and 4 tunable parameters respectively). The technique is also applicable for higher depths and the concentration effect is cross verified numerically. Parameter concentrations allow for training on a fraction $w < n$ of qubits to assert that these parameters are nearly optimal on $n$ qubits. Clearly this effect has significant practical importance.

[1]  C. Monroe,et al.  Quantum approximate optimization of the long-range Ising model with a trapped-ion quantum simulator , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Jun Li,et al.  Hybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Quantum Optimal Control. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[3]  Gavin E. Crooks,et al.  Performance of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on the Maximum Cut Problem , 2018, 1811.08419.

[4]  The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model at Infinite Size. , 2019, 1910.08187.

[5]  Gian Giacomo Guerreschi,et al.  QAOA for Max-Cut requires hundreds of qubits for quantum speed-up , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[6]  M. Lukin,et al.  Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator , 2017, Nature.

[7]  Sergey Pavlov,et al.  “Zhores” — Petaflops supercomputer for data-driven modeling, machine learning and artificial intelligence installed in Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology , 2019, Open Engineering.

[8]  Timothy H. Hsieh,et al.  Ultrafast variational simulation of nontrivial quantum states with long-range interactions , 2019, Physical Review A.

[9]  Robert Koenig,et al.  Obstacles to State Preparation and Variational Optimization from Symmetry Protection. , 2019, 1910.08980.

[10]  M. Greiner,et al.  Quantum State Engineering of a Hubbard System with Ultracold Fermions. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[11]  D. Bacon,et al.  Quantum approximate optimization of non-planar graph problems on a planar superconducting processor , 2020, Nature Physics.

[12]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets , 2017, Nature.

[13]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Control of quantum phenomena: past, present and future , 2009, 0912.5121.

[14]  Matteo M. Wauters,et al.  Polynomial scaling of QAOA for ground-state preparation of the fully-connected p-spin ferromagnet. , 2020 .

[15]  Murphy Yuezhen Niu,et al.  Optimizing QAOA: Success Probability and Runtime Dependence on Circuit Depth , 2019, 1905.12134.

[16]  Daisuke Shiomi,et al.  Quantum Chemistry on Quantum Computers: A Method for Preparation of Multiconfigurational Wave Functions on Quantum Computers without Performing Post-Hartree–Fock Calculations , 2018, ACS central science.

[17]  Martin Leib,et al.  Training the quantum approximate optimization algorithm without access to a quantum processing unit , 2019, Quantum Science and Technology.

[18]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation , 2009 .

[19]  E. Rieffel,et al.  XY mixers: Analytical and numerical results for the quantum alternating operator ansatz , 2020 .

[20]  J. Biamonte,et al.  Certified variational quantum algorithms for eigenstate preparation , 2020 .

[21]  V. Akshay,et al.  Reachability Deficits in Quantum Approximate Optimization , 2019, Physical review letters.

[22]  A. Harrow,et al.  Quantum Supremacy through the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm , 2016, 1602.07674.

[23]  E. Rieffel,et al.  Near-optimal quantum circuit for Grover's unstructured search using a transverse field , 2017, 1702.02577.

[24]  Jacob Biamonte,et al.  Abrupt transitions in variational quantum circuit training , 2020, Physical Review A.

[25]  M. Leib,et al.  Comparison of QAOA with Quantum and Simulated Annealing , 2019, 1901.01903.

[26]  Timothy H. Hsieh,et al.  Efficient unitary preparation of non-trivial quantum states , 2018 .

[27]  Instance Independence of Single Layer Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on Mixed-Spin Models at Infinite Size , 2021, Quantum.

[28]  Leo Zhou,et al.  Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: Performance, Mechanism, and Implementation on Near-Term Devices , 2018, Physical Review X.

[29]  Aaron C. E. Lee,et al.  Experimental Performance of a Quantum Simulator: Optimizing Adiabatic Evolution and Identifying Many-Body Ground States , 2013, 1305.2253.

[30]  G. Kurizki,et al.  Heat-machine control by quantum-state preparation: from quantum engines to refrigerators. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  S. Lloyd Quantum approximate optimization is computationally universal , 2018, 1812.11075.

[32]  F. Brandão,et al.  For Fixed Control Parameters the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm's Objective Function Value Concentrates for Typical Instances , 2018, 1812.04170.

[33]  S. Eidenbenz,et al.  Grover Mixers for QAOA: Shifting Complexity from Mixer Design to State Preparation , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE).

[34]  S. Gleyzes,et al.  Fast Navigation in a Large Hilbert Space Using Quantum Optimal Control , 2020 .

[35]  D. Leibfried Quantum state preparation and control of single molecular ions , 2011, 1109.0208.

[36]  Maksym Serbyn,et al.  Quantum annealing initialization of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm , 2021, Quantum.

[37]  P. Silvi,et al.  Variational quantum state preparation via quantum data buses , 2019, Quantum.

[38]  M. B. Hastings,et al.  Classical and quantum bounded depth approximation algorithms , 2019, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[39]  L. Brady,et al.  Optimal Protocols in Quantum Annealing and Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm Problems. , 2021, Physical review letters.

[40]  E. Farhi,et al.  A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm , 2014, 1411.4028.