Validating new toxicology tests for regulatory acceptance.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Before a new or revised toxicology test is considered acceptable for safety evaluation of new substances, the test users and the industrial and regulatory decision makers must feel comfortable with it, and the decisions it supports. Comfort with, and the acceptance of, a new test comes after knowing that it has been validated for its proposed use. The validation process is designed to determine the operational characteristics of a test, that is, its reliability and relevance, in addition to its strengths and limitations. The reliability of a test is measured by its reproducibility. Its relevance is judged by its mechanistic relationship to the health effects of concern, and its ability to predict or identify those effects. The U.S. government has recently formed the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) to work with federal agencies and test developers to coordinate the evaluation and adoption of new test methods. The ICCVAM will provide guidance to agencies and other stakeholders on criteria and processes for development, validation, and acceptance of tests; coordinate technical reviews of proposed new tests of interagency interest; facilitate information sharing among agencies; and serve as an interagency resource and communications link with parties outside of the federal government on matters of test method validation.
[1] S Green. Regulatory agency considerations and requirements for validation of toxicity test alternatives. , 1993, Toxicology letters.
[2] J Ashby,et al. Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals , 2021, Advances in Pharmacology.
[3] Robert D. Combes,et al. Practical Aspects of the Validation of Toxicity Test Procedures , 1995 .
[4] Michael Balls,et al. Report and Recommendations of the CAAT 1 /ERGATT 2 Workshop on the Validation of Toxicity Test Procedures 3 , 1990 .