Bistability and multistability in opinion dynamics models

We have mathematically analyzed several opinion dynamics models.A simple model shows bistability and explains when extreme opinions prevail.An extended model including multiple competitors shows multistability. In this paper, we analyze a few opinion formation or election game dynamics models. For a simple model with two subpopulations with opposing opinions A and B, if the fraction of committed believers of opinion A ("A zealots") is less than a critical value, then the system has two bistable equilibrium points. When the fraction is equal to the critical value, the system undergoes a saddle-node bifurcation. When the fraction is larger than the critical value, a boundary equilibrium point is globally asymptotically stable, suggesting that the entire population reaches a consensus on A. We find a similar bistability property in the model in which both opinions have their own zealots. We also extend the model to include multiple competitors and show the dynamical behavior of multistability. The more competitors subpopulation A has, the fewer zealots opinion A needs to obtain consensus.

[1]  M. San Miguel,et al.  Neighborhood models of minority opinion spreading , 2004, cond-mat/0403339.

[2]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Coevolutionary Games - A Mini Review , 2009, Biosyst..

[3]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[4]  S. Galam,et al.  Towards a theory of collective phenomena: Consensus and attitude changes in groups , 1991 .

[5]  S. Galam.  Minority opinion spreading in random geometry , 2002, cond-mat/0203553.

[6]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Maxi San Miguel,et al.  Ordering dynamics with two non-excluding options: bilingualism in language competition , 2006, physics/0609079.

[8]  P. Clifford,et al.  A model for spatial conflict , 1973 .

[9]  S. Galam,et al.  Sociophysics: A new approach of sociological collective behaviour. I. mean‐behaviour description of a strike , 1982, 2211.07041.

[10]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[11]  Mahdi Jalili,et al.  Influence maximization of informed agents in social networks , 2015, Appl. Math. Comput..

[12]  S. Galam.  Social paradoxes of majority rule voting and renormalization group , 1990 .

[13]  Anna Papush,et al.  Encouraging moderation: clues from a simple model of ideological conflict. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[14]  Masoud Asadpour,et al.  Opinion Formation by Informed Agents , 2015 .

[15]  M. G. Cosenza,et al.  Spontaneous ordering against an external field in non-equilibrium systems , 2008, 0811.2726.

[16]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[17]  Yilun Shang,et al.  An agent based model for opinion dynamics with random confidence threshold , 2014, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[18]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion evolution in closed community , 2000, cond-mat/0101130.

[19]  Mahdi Jalili.  Effects of leaders and social power on opinion formation in complex networks , 2013, Simul..

[20]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Competition and cooperation among different punishing strategies in the spatial public goods game , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Spontaneous Reorientations In A Model Of Opinion Dynamics With Anticonformists , 2010 .

[22]  Frantisek Slanina,et al.  Dynamical phase transitions in Hegselmann-Krause model of opinion dynamics and consensus , 2014, 1401.4324.

[23]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion dynamics as a movement in a bistable potential. , 2011, 1103.0417.

[24]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Information flow in social groups , 2003, cond-mat/0305305.

[25]  Francesca Colaiori,et al.  Interplay between media and social influence in the collective behavior of opinion dynamics. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  W. Weidlich,et al.  THE STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF POLARIZATION PHENOMENA IN SOCIETY , 1971 .