These lemons are sour: Investigating the influence of demonstrative determiners on the N400 complex

[1]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[2]  Salim Roukos,et al.  Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[3]  J. Kounios,et al.  Structure and process in semantic memory: evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[6]  S. Levinson Deixis and Demonstratives , 1999 .

[7]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Kees van Deemter,et al.  Information sharing : reference and presupposition in language generation and interpretation , 2002 .

[10]  R. Dixon Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology , 2003 .

[11]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2004, Science.

[12]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[14]  David Poeppel,et al.  Characterising kinds and instances of kinds: ERP reflections , 2008 .

[15]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  When the Truth Is Not Too Hard to Handle , 2008, Psychological science.

[17]  Paul Elbourne,et al.  Demonstratives as individual concepts , 2008 .

[18]  Hartmut Leuthold,et al.  Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds , 2008, Brain Research.

[19]  Patrick F. Reidy An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis , 2009 .

[20]  Tobias Richter,et al.  You don't have to believe everything you read: background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood: An Event-Related Potential Study of Lexical Relationships and Prediction in Context. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[22]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.

[23]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Quantifiers more or less quantify online: ERP evidence for partial incremental interpretation. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.

[24]  R. B. Reilly,et al.  FASTER: Fully Automated Statistical Thresholding for EEG artifact Rejection , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[26]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[27]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  If the real world were irrelevant, so to speak: The role of propositional truth-value in counterfactual sentence comprehension , 2012, Cognition.

[28]  Gertrud Faaß,et al.  SdeWaC - A Corpus of Parsable Sentences from the Web , 2013, GSCL.

[29]  Nathaniel J. Smith,et al.  The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic , 2013, Cognition.

[30]  Tobias Richter,et al.  Does Validation During Language Comprehension Depend on an Evaluative Mindset? , 2014 .

[31]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Examining the N400 semantic context effect item-by-item: relationship to corpus-based measures of word co-occurrence. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[32]  Fritz Günther,et al.  LSAfun - An R package for computations based on Latent Semantic Analysis , 2014, Behavior Research Methods.

[33]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  The Truth Before and After: Brain Potentials Reveal Automatic Activation of Event Knowledge during Sentence Comprehension , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Quantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.

[35]  Barbara Kaup,et al.  Is there a difference between stripy journeys and stripy ladybirds? The N400 response to semantic and world-knowledge violations during sentence processing , 2016, Brain and Cognition.

[36]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Quantification, Prediction, and the Online Impact of Sentence Truth-Value: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Barbara Kaup,et al.  The Sounds of Sentences: Differentiating the Influence of Physical Sound, Sound Imagery, and Linguistically Implied Sounds on Physical Sound Processing , 2016, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[38]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials , 2016 .

[39]  Fritz Günther,et al.  Latent semantic analysis cosines as a cognitive similarity measure: Evidence from priming studies , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Pragmatic skills predict online counterfactual comprehension: Evidence from the N400 , 2016, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.