Rate of instrumentation changes on postoperative and follow-up radiographs after primary complex spinal fusion (five or more levels) for adult deformity correction.

OBJECTIVEIn the United States, healthcare expenditures have been soaring at a concerning rate. There has been an excessive use of postoperative radiographs after spine surgery and this has been a target for hospitals to reduce unnecessary costs. However, there are only limited data identifying the rate of instrumentation changes on radiographs after complex spine surgery involving ≥ 5-level fusions.METHODSThe medical records of 136 adult (≥ 18 years old) patients with spine deformity undergoing elective, primary complex spinal fusion (≥ 5 levels) for deformity correction at a major academic institution between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and intra- and postoperative complication rates were collected for each patient. The authors reviewed the first 5 subsequent postoperative and follow-up radiographs, and determined whether revision of surgery was performed within 5 years postoperatively. The primary outcome investigated in this study was the rate of hardware changes on follow-up radiographs.RESULTSThe majority of patients were female, with a mean age of 53.8 ± 20.0 years and a body mass index of 27.3 ± 6.2 kg/m2 (parametric data are expressed as the mean ± SD). The median number of fusion levels was 9 (interquartile range 7-13), with a mean length of surgery of 327.8 ± 124.7 minutes and an estimated blood loss of 1312.1 ± 1269.2 ml. The mean length of hospital stay was 6.6 ± 3.9 days, with a 30-day readmission rate of 14.0%. Postoperative and follow-up change in stability on radiographs (days from operation) included: image 1 (4.6 ± 9.3 days) 0.0%; image 2 (51.7 ± 49.9 days) 3.0%; image 3 (142.1 ± 179.8 days) 5.6%; image 4 (277.3 ± 272.5 days) 11.3%; and image 5 (463.1 ± 525.9 days) 15.7%. The 3rd year after surgery had the highest rate of hardware revision (5.55%), followed by the 2nd year (4.68%), and the 1st year (4.54%).CONCLUSIONSThis study suggests that the rate of instrumentation changes on radiographs increases over time, with no changes occurring at the first postoperative image. In an era of cost-conscious healthcare, fewer orders for early radiographs after complex spinal fusions (≥ 5 levels) may not impact patient care and can reduce the overall use of healthcare resources.

[1]  Munish C. Gupta,et al.  Radiographic Fusion Grade Does Not Impact Health-Related Quality of Life in the Absence of Instrumentation Failure for Patients Undergoing Posterior Instrumented Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[2]  D. Togawa,et al.  Treatment strategy for rod fractures following corrective fusion surgery in adult spinal deformity depends on symptoms and local alignment change. , 2018, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[3]  D. K. Hamilton,et al.  The Fate of Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Incurring Rod Fracture After Thoracolumbar Fusion. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[4]  J. Lonner,et al.  Radiographic Imaging in the Postanesthesia Care Unit is Unnecessary After Partial Knee Arthroplasty. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  Amichai Erdfarb,et al.  Imaging of lumbar spine fusion. , 2014, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[6]  A. Tsimpas,et al.  Yield and utility of routine postoperative imaging after resection of brain metastases , 2014, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[7]  M. Diepers,et al.  Routine Postoperative Imaging Early After Lumbar Decompression Surgery: A Prospective Evaluation , 2013, Spine.

[8]  D. Levin,et al.  The Overuse of Diagnostic Imaging and the Choosing Wisely Initiative , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  J. Grauer,et al.  Routine Anteroposterior Radiographs Have Limited Utility for Patients After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion , 2012, Spine.

[10]  R. Molinari,et al.  In-hospital postoperative radiographs for instrumented single-level degenerative spinal fusions: utility after intraoperative fluoroscopy. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[11]  Linda Humphrey,et al.  Appropriate Use of Screening and Diagnostic Tests to Foster High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008 , 2012, Spine.

[13]  James H Thrall,et al.  Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[14]  J. Iglehart.  Health insurers and medical-imaging policy--a work in progress. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Glaser,et al.  Are Routine Radiographs Needed in the First Year After Lumbar Spinal Fusions? , 2009, Spine.

[16]  V. Fuchs.  Three "inconvenient truths" about health care. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  K. Thorpe.  Factors accounting for the rise in health-care spending in the United States: the role of rising disease prevalence and treatment intensity. , 2006, Public health.

[18]  J. Iglehart,et al.  The new era of medical imaging--progress and pitfalls. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  K. Thorpe.  The rise in health care spending and what to do about it. , 2005, Health affairs.

[20]  D. Levin,et al.  Turf wars in radiology: the overutilization of imaging resulting from self-referral. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[21]  Alf Nachemson,et al.  Spinal-fusion surgery - the case for restraint. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  D. Glaser,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of immediate postoperative radiographs after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective and prospective study of 750 patients. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  W. Hozack,et al.  Radiographic cost reduction strategy in total joint arthroplasty. A prospective analysis. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  D. Diduch,et al.  Postoperative radiographs after total knee arthroplasty: a cost-containment strategy. , 1998, The American journal of knee surgery.