The term Automated Contingency Management (ACM) has been used to describe intelligent systems capable of mission re-planning and control reconfiguration in the presence of a current health state diagnosis. While a diagnostics driven ACM capability designed to optimize multi-objective performance criteria remains a significant technical challenge, it cannot hope to overcome the fact that it will always be a reactive paradigm. This paper, therefore, introduces an automated contingency management paradigm based on both current heath state (diagnosis) and future health state estimates (prognosis). Including Prognostics in the control loop poses at least two additional challenges to ACM. First, future state prediction will, in general, have uncertainty that increases as the prediction horizon increases so adaptive prognosis routines that manage uncertainty are critical. Secondly, a warning period afforded by prognosis allows ACM to be split into a realtime “reactive” component and a non-real time “planning” component that considers temporal parameters and the potential impact of being proactive with mitigating action. The proactive ACM paradigm was developed and evaluated in the context of a generic mono-propellant system model in Simulink/Stateflow with diagnostics, prognostics and an optimal reconfigurable control system. Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in prognostics enhanced ACM system are briefly discussed. Preliminary results from the on-going research work are presented and the paper is concluded with remarks on future work.
[1]
Liang Tang,et al.
Simulation-based health and contingency management
,
2006,
2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.
[2]
Kai Goebel,et al.
Prognostic Fusion for Uncertainty Reduction
,
2007
.
[3]
David G. Ward,et al.
A Retrofit Architecture for Model-Based Adaptive Flight Control
,
2004
.
[4]
Michael J. Roemer,et al.
Automated Contingency Management Design for Advanced Propulsion Systems
,
2005
.
[5]
Liang Tang,et al.
Simulation-based Design and Validation of Automated Contingency Management for Propulsion Systems
,
2007,
2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.
[6]
Bin Zhang,et al.
Automated Contingency Management for Propulsion Systems
,
2007,
2007 European Control Conference (ECC).
[7]
Frank L. Lewis,et al.
Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis for Engineering Systems
,
2006
.
[8]
Michael J. Roemer,et al.
Real Time Health Estimation and Automated Fault Accommodation for Propulsion Systems
,
2007
.
[9]
C.S. Byington,et al.
A model-based approach to prognostics and health management for flight control actuators
,
2004,
2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).
[10]
Jonathan S. Litt,et al.
Adaptive Gas Turbine Engine Control for Deterioration Compensation Due to Aging
,
2003
.