Weighting intervals and ranking, exemplified by leaching potential of pesticides

Often a ranking based on a multi-indicator system is performed by construction of a composite indicator, which is generally computed as a weighted average of the indicators. The set of weighttuples is introduced: the g-space. Each point of this space represents a tuple of weight values, which lead together with the indicators of an object to a certain value of the composite indicator. The composite indicator induces a weak or linear order, when the associated space of an object set together with a data matrix is available. Each hypercube in the g-space, corresponding to intervals of the weights, can be represented by a partial order which is not necessarily a weak or even a linear order. Changing from one point of the hypercube to another will often not change the partial order. We have a freedom of changing weights according to the dimensionality of the g-space -1 (because of normalization). When other hypercubes are selected, then other partial orders can be found. The boundary between two hypercubes with different partial orders is a lower dimensional sphere, with fewer degrees of freedom. In the current paper we treat these two points: (i) how to use weight intervals to determine the resulting partial orders and (ii) if the number of indicators is not too large and if the focus is on a pair of objects instead on the whole set, then equations are given which can be helpful.

[1]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Properties of mutual rank probabilities in partially ordered sets , 2008 .

[2]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  METEOR: a step-by-step procedure to explore effects of indicator aggregation in multi criteria decision aiding – application to water management in Berlin, Germany , 2006 .

[3]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Basic principles of Hasse diagram technique in chemistry. , 2008, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[4]  Ganapati P. Patil,et al.  Ranking and Prioritization for Multi-indicator Systems: Introduction to Partial Order Applications , 2011 .

[5]  Peter Winkler Average height in a partially ordered set , 1982, Discret. Math..

[6]  R. Brüggemann,et al.  Using Poset Theory to Compare Fuzzy Multidimensional Material Deprivation Across Regions , 2011 .

[7]  Paola Annoni,et al.  The dualistic approach of FCA: a further insight into Ontario Lake sediments. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[8]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  An Improved Estimation of Averaged Ranks of Partial Orders , 2011 .

[9]  J. Paelinck Qualiflex: A flexible multiple-criteria method , 1978 .

[10]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  The concept of stability fields and hot spots in ranking of environmental chemicals , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  G. Munda Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy , 2007 .

[12]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  A New Tool to Analyze Partially Ordered Sets Application: ranking of polychlorinated biphenyls and alkanes/alkenes in river Main, Germany , 2011 .

[13]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[14]  Efraim Halfon,et al.  Risk Assessment for Pesticides and Their Metabolites in Water , 1996 .

[15]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Different ranking methods: potentialities and pitfalls for the case of European opinion poll , 2007, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[16]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Ranking patterns, an application to refrigerants , 2008 .

[17]  Jean H. P. Paelinck,et al.  Qualitative Multicriteria Analysis: An Application to Airport Location , 1977 .

[18]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Antichains in Partial Order, Example: Pollution in a German Region by Lead, Cadmium, Zinc and Sulfur in the Herb Layer , 2012 .

[19]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Approximation of average ranks in posets , 2011 .

[20]  Ganapati P. Patil,et al.  Multicriteria prioritization and partial order in environmental sciences , 2010, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[21]  Kristina Voigt,et al.  An evaluation of online databases by methods of lattice theory , 1995 .

[22]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Estimation of Averaged Ranks by a Local Partial Order Model , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[23]  J. Brans,et al.  A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making) , 2008 .

[24]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  A hitchhiker's guide to poset ranking. , 2008, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[25]  L Carlsen,et al.  The influence on partial order ranking from input parameter uncertainty. Definition of a robustness parameter. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[26]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Dominance and separability in posets, their application to isoelectronic species with equal total nuclear charge , 2008 .

[27]  Thierry Denoeux,et al.  Nonparametric rank-based statistics and significance tests for fuzzy data , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[28]  Bernd Münier,et al.  The Usefulness of a Stochastic Approach for Multi-Criteria Selection , 2007, EnviroInfo.

[29]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[30]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Exploring Partial Order of European Countries , 2007 .

[31]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Mismeasuring our lives : why GDP doesn't add up : the report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress , 2010 .

[32]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Exploiting the Lattice of Ideals Representation of a Poset , 2006, Fundam. Informaticae.

[33]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Ranking of refrigerants. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Partial order investigation of multiple indicator systems using variance-based sensitivity analysis , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..