Adapting the "staged model for software evolution" to free/libre/open source software

Research into traditional software evolution has been tackled from two broad perspectives: that focused on the how, which looks at the processes, methods and techniques to implement and evolve software; and that focused on the what/why perspective, aiming at achieving an understanding of the drivers and general characteristics of the software evolution phenomenon. The two perspectives are related in various ways: the study of the what/why is for instance essential to achieve an appropriate management of software engineering activities, and to guide innovation in processes, methods and tools, that is, the how. The output of the what/why studies is exemplified by empirical hypotheses, such as the staged model of software evolution. This paper focuses on the commonalities and differences between the evolution and patterns in the lifecycles of traditional commercial systems and free/libre/open source software (FLOSS) systems. The existing staged model for software evolution is therefore revised for its applicability on FLOSS systems.

[1]  Meir M. Lehman,et al.  Program evolution: processes of software change , 1985 .

[2]  W. W. Royce,et al.  Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques , 1987, ICSE '87.

[3]  Andrea Capiluppi,et al.  Models for the evolution of OS projects , 2003, International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2003. ICSM 2003. Proceedings..

[4]  Meir M. Lehman,et al.  Rules and Tools for Software Evolution Planning and Management , 2001, Ann. Softw. Eng..

[5]  Martin Michlmayr,et al.  From the Cathedral to the Bazaar: An Empirical Study of the Lifecycle of Volunteer Community Projects , 2007, OSS.

[6]  Jesús M. González-Barahona,et al.  Evolution and growth in large libre software projects , 2005, Eighth International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE'05).

[7]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Automating the Measurement of Open Source Projects , 2003 .

[8]  R. English,et al.  Identifying Success and Tragedy of FLOSS Commons: A Preliminary Classification of Sourceforge.net Projects , 2007, First International Workshop on Emerging Trends in FLOSS Research and Development (FLOSS'07: ICSE Workshops 2007).

[9]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[10]  Keith H. Bennett,et al.  A Staged Model for the Software Life Cycle , 2000, Computer.

[11]  Will Venters,et al.  Software engineering: theory and practice , 2006 .

[12]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[13]  Meir M. Lehman,et al.  Behavioural modelling of long-lived evolution processes - some issues and an example , 2002, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[14]  Meir M. Lehman Programs, Cities, Students— Limits to Growth? , 1978 .

[15]  Wladyslaw M. Turski Reference Model for Smooth Growth of Software Systems(003)5402022 , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[16]  Jesús M. González-Barahona,et al.  Contributor Turnover in Libre Software Projects , 2006, OSS.

[17]  Mikio Aoyama,et al.  Metrics and analysis of software architecture evolution with discontinuity , 2002, IWPSE '02.

[18]  Rodolfo Alfredo Bertone,et al.  Software engineering: Theory and practice, 2nd Edition. Shari Lawrence Pfleeger. Prentice Hall, 2001 , 2005 .

[19]  Meir M. Lehman FEAST-Feedback, Evolution and Software Technology , 1998, EWSPT.

[20]  Michael W. Godfrey,et al.  Evolution in open source software: a case study , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Software Maintenance.

[21]  Helen Sharp,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Evolution of an Agile-Developed Software System , 2007, 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'07).

[22]  Martin Michlmayr,et al.  How to have a successful free software project , 2004, 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference.

[23]  Ned Chapin,et al.  Types of software evolution and software maintenance , 2001, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..