Modeling of Gas Turbine Fuel Nozzle Spray

Satisfactory performance of the gas turbine combustor relies on the careful design of various components, particularly the fuel injector. It is, therefore, essential to establish a fundamental basis for fuel injection modeling that involves various atomization processes. A two-dimensional fuel injection model has been formulated to simulate the airflow within and downstream of the atomizer and address the formation and breakup of the liquid sheet formed at the atomizer exit. The sheet breakup under the effects of airblast, fuel pressure, or the combined atomization mode of the air-assist type is considered in the calculation. The model accounts for secondary breakup of drops and the stochastic Lagrangian treatment of spray. The calculation of spray evaporation addresses both droplet heat-up and steady-state mechanisms, and fuel vapor concentration is based on the partial pressure concept. An enhanced evaporation model has been developed that accounts for multicomponent, finite mass diffusivity and conductivity effects, and addresses near-critical evaporation. The present investigation involved predictions of flow and spray characteristics of two distinctively different fuel atomizers under both nonreacting and reacting conditions. The predictions of the continuous phase velocity components and the spray mean drop sizes agree well with the detailed measurements obtained for the two atomizers, which indicates the model accounts for key aspects of atomization. The model also provides insight into ligament formation and breakup at the atomizer exit and the initial drop sizes formed in the atomizer near field region where measurements are difficult to obtain. The calculations of the reacting spray show the fuel-rich region occupied most of the spray volume with two-peak radial gas temperature profiles. The results also provided local concentrations of unburned hydrocarbon (UHC) and carbon monoxide (CO) in atomizer flowfield, information that could support the effort to reduce emission levels of gas turbine combustors.

[1]  Vincent McDonell,et al.  Gas and drop behavior in reacting and non-reacting air-blast atomizer sprays , 1991 .

[2]  A. Lefebvre,et al.  The Influence of Liquid Film Thickness on Airblast Atomization , 1980 .

[3]  W. R. Johns,et al.  The aerodynamic instability and disintegration of viscous liquid sheets , 1963 .

[4]  H. C. Mongia,et al.  On the modeling of turbulent evaporating sprays: Eulerian versus lagrangian approach , 1987 .

[5]  J. S. Chin An Engineering Calculation Method for Multi-Component Stagnant Droplet Evaporation With Finite Diffusivity , 1994 .

[6]  G. J. Sturgess,et al.  Calculation of a hollow-cone liquid spray in a uniform airstream , 1985 .

[7]  Arthur H. Lefebvre,et al.  Internal flow characteristics of simplex swirl atomizers , 1984 .

[8]  M. Pilch,et al.  Use of breakup time data and velocity history data to predict the maximum size of stable fragments for acceleration-induced breakup of a liquid drop , 1987 .

[9]  Hukam Chand Mongia,et al.  Model for airblast atomization , 1991 .

[10]  Calculation of a hollow-cone liquid spray in a uniform air stream , 1984 .

[11]  Gerard M. Faeth,et al.  CURRENT STATUS OF DROPLET AND LIQUID COMBUSTION , 1977 .

[12]  N. Dombrowski,et al.  The effect of ambient density on drop formation in sprays , 1962 .

[13]  A. Lefebvre,et al.  Influence of Atomizer Design Features on Mean Drop Size , 1983 .

[14]  R. P. Fraser,et al.  Drop formation from rapidly moving liquid sheets , 1962 .

[15]  N. K. Rizk,et al.  Performance of hybrid airblast atomizers under low power conditions , 1992 .

[16]  H. C. Simmons The Prediction of Sauter Mean Diameter for Gas Turbine Fuel Nozzles of Different Types , 1980 .

[17]  J. Chin,et al.  An engineering calculation method for turbine fuel droplet evaporation at critical conditions with finite liquid diffusivity , 1995 .

[18]  A. K. Jasuja,et al.  Atomization of Crude and Residual Fuel Oils , 1979 .