Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) for auditory assessment: Validation in a young adult normal-hearing population

This study aims to determine the degree to which Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART), a freely-available program running on a tablet computer, is capable of reproducing standard laboratory results. Undergraduate students were assigned to one of three within-subject conditions that examined repeatability of performance on a battery of psychoacoustical tests of temporal fine structure processing, spectro-temporal amplitude modulation, and targets in competition. The Repeatability condition examined test/retest with the same system, the Headphones condition examined the effects of varying headphones (passive and active noise-attenuating), and the Noise condition examined repeatability in the presence of recorded cafeteria noise. In general, performance on the test battery showed high repeatability, even across manipulated conditions, and was similar to that reported in the literature. These data serve as validation that suprathreshold psychoacoustical tests can be made accessible to run on consumer-grade hardware and performed in less controlled settings. This dataset also provides a distribution of thresholds that can be used as a normative baseline against which auditory dysfunction can be identified in future work.

[1]  Mohammad Abdus Salam,et al.  Guest Editorial , 2011, J. Commun..

[2]  B. Moore,et al.  Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition , 2015, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[3]  I. Winter The Neurophysiology of Pitch , 2005 .

[4]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S) , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[5]  Georg v. Békésy,et al.  Hearing Theories and Complex Sounds , 1963 .

[6]  N. Viemeister Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Grose,et al.  Processing of Temporal Fine Structure as a Function of Age , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[8]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[9]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Independent impacts of age and hearing loss on spatial release in a complex auditory environment , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[10]  T Najenson,et al.  Frequency selectivity as a potential measure of noise damage susceptibility. , 1992, British journal of audiology.

[11]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  The effects of modulator shape and methods for expressing modulation depth on spectral modulation detection thresholds , 2019, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D. Green An introduction to hearing , 1976 .

[13]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Development and validation of Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) measures for auditory research. , 2018, Proceedings of meetings on acoustics. Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  I. Hirsh The Influence of Interaural Phase on Interaural Summation and Inhibition , 1948 .

[15]  D. Frisina,et al.  Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  I. Whitfield,et al.  RESPONSES OF AUDITORY CORTICAL NEURONS TO STIMULI OF CHANGING FREQUENCY. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  H. Versnel,et al.  Spectrotemporal Response Properties of Inferior Colliculus Neurons in Alert Monkey , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  David A Eddins,et al.  Distribution of spectral modulation transfer functions in a young, normal-hearing population. , 2018, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  P. Souza,et al.  Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Jerger,et al.  Preferred Method For Clinical Determination Of Pure-Tone Thresholds , 1959 .

[21]  S. Shamma,et al.  Analysis of dynamic spectra in ferret primary auditory cortex. I. Characteristics of single-unit responses to moving ripple spectra. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  B C Moore,et al.  Distribution of auditory-filter bandwidths at 2 kHz in young normal listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  M. García-Pérez A cautionary note on the use of the adaptive up-down method. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Andrew J. Oxenham,et al.  Assessing the Role of Place and Timing Cues in Coding Frequency and Amplitude Modulation as a Function of Age , 2017, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[25]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  F E Musiek,et al.  Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cerebral lesions. , 1987, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[27]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Cochlear nerve fiber responses: distribution along the cochlear partition. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  R. Plomp Rate of Decay of Auditory Sensation , 1964 .

[29]  Pamela Souza,et al.  Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  M. Schönwiesner,et al.  Spectro-temporal modulation transfer function of single voxels in the human auditory cortex measured with high-resolution fMRI , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  E. Owens,et al.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1997 .

[32]  Ellen Raben Pedersen,et al.  Letter to the Editor: An Affront to Scientific Inquiry Re: Moore, D. R. (2018) Editorial: Auditory Processing Disorder, Ear Hear, 39, 617-620. , 2018, Ear and hearing.

[33]  B. Shinn-Cunningham Object-based auditory and visual attention , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  B C Moore,et al.  Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method. , 1992, British journal of audiology.

[35]  K. Sen,et al.  Spectral-temporal Receptive Fields of Nonlinear Auditory Neurons Obtained Using Natural Sounds , 2022 .

[36]  John Fletcher,et al.  Speech Understanding and Aging , 1977 .

[37]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Exploring the Role of the Modulation Spectrum in Phoneme Recognition , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[39]  Joseph W. Hall,et al.  Binaural Processing and Auditory Asymmetries , 2010 .

[40]  M. García-Pérez,et al.  Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: asymptotic and small-sample properties , 1998, Vision Research.

[41]  S A Shamma,et al.  Spectro-temporal response field characterization with dynamic ripples in ferret primary auditory cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  M A García-Pérez,et al.  Yes-No Staircases with Fixed Step Sizes: Psychometric Properties and Optimal Setup , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[43]  S. Shamma On the role of space and time in auditory processing , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  Steven van de Par,et al.  Sound segregation based on temporal envelope structure and binaural cues. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[46]  T Houtgast,et al.  Spectral sharpness and vowel dissimilarity. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Validating a Rapid, Automated Test of Spatial Release From Masking , 2017, American journal of audiology.

[48]  Frederick J Gallun,et al.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[49]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  S. Shamma,et al.  Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Auditory and Cognitive Factors Associated with Speech‐in‐Noise Complaints following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury , 2017, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[52]  C. C. Bunch AGE VARIATIONS IN AUDITORY ACUITY , 1929 .

[53]  D J Arnst,et al.  Errors on the Staggered Spondaic Word (SSW) Test in a Group of Adult Normal Listeners , 1981, Ear and hearing.

[54]  F. De Filippis,et al.  A Selected Core Microbiome Drives the Early Stages of Three Popular Italian Cheese Manufactures , 2014, PloS one.

[55]  D M Green,et al.  Temporal auditory acuity. , 1971, Psychological review.

[56]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Relating age and hearing loss to monaural, bilateral, and binaural temporal sensitivity1 , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[57]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A systematic framework for functional connectivity measures , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[58]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  A Comparison of Behavioral Methods for Indexing the Auditory Processing of Temporal Fine Structure Cues , 2019, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[59]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Spectro-Temporal Characteristics of Speech at High Frequencies, and the Potential for Restoration of Audibility to People with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[60]  Julie E. Elie,et al.  Neural processing of natural sounds , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[61]  Gerald Kidd,et al.  The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  W. T. Nelson,et al.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  C Witton,et al.  Monaural and binaural detection of sinusoidal phase modulation of a 500-Hz tone. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies , 1983 .

[65]  Pamela Souza,et al.  Comparison of Clinical and Traditional Gap Detection Tests. , 2015, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[66]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  Robert H. Pierzycki,et al.  Relation between Speech-in-Noise Threshold, Hearing Loss and Cognition from 40–69 Years of Age , 2014, PloS one.

[68]  G. Manley,et al.  SPRINGER HANDBOOK OF AUDITORY RESEARCH , 2014 .

[69]  W O Olsen,et al.  Masking level differences encountered in clinical populations. , 1976, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[70]  Jonathan H. Venezia,et al.  Identification of the Spectrotemporal Modulations That Support Speech Intelligibility in Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners. , 2019, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[71]  J. Winer Decoding the auditory corticofugal systems , 2005, Hearing Research.