WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

The higher education landscape in developing countries is faced with many challenges, one of which is high faculty to student ratio. An obvious implication of this is compromise on the quality of classroom engagement. The distractions caused by the not conducive learning space and instructors’ inability to elucidate correct feedbacks from students usually lead to poor learning outcomes. Feedback mechanisms that are unobtrusive and efficient in processing large data in real-time are needful to measure quality learning experience in such large classroom settings. With the latest impact of penetration and adoption of internet and mobile technologies in most developing counties, wearable technology is a feasible solution to manage and monitor classroom involvement; as real time student feedback can be integrated in the design and delivery of instruction in and out of the classroom. In this paper, we present state of the art of wearable technology and explored the opportunities of wearable technology in the higher education. Specifically, we presented scenarios in which wearable technology can be employed to understand and analyze physiological signals and emotional responses from learners in real-time; the end result of which would increase the quality of classroom engagement, inspire new pedagogy, drive new trends in peer-to-peer collaborations, and increase the learning outcomes. Moreover, we identified some challenges that may hinder this development such as: inconclusive user studies of wearable technology in developing countries and inadequate infrastructure. Finally, we make appropriate recommendations on how these challenges can be surmounted

[1]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Basic Concepts in Wearable Computers and Augmented Reality , 2001 .

[2]  K. Cotton,et al.  Monitoring Student Learning in the Classroom , 2009 .

[3]  J. Connell,et al.  The validity of students' self-reports as measures of performance affecting self-appraisals. , 1992 .

[4]  Rafael A. Calvo,et al.  Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[5]  Elaine Chapman,et al.  Alternative Approaches to Assessing Student Engagement Rates , 2003 .

[6]  A. Paswan,et al.  Student Evaluation of Instructor: A Nomological Investigation Using Structural Equation Modeling , 2002 .

[7]  Roy Phitayakorn,et al.  A blinded assessment of video quality in wearable technology for telementoring in open surgery: the Google Glass experience , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  MoodWings: a wearable biofeedback device for real-time stress intervention , 2013, PETRA '13.

[9]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Learning to Click , 2010 .

[11]  Billie Whitehouse,et al.  Designing for Humans in a Digital Age: Building Wearable Technology to Convey Information and Emotions , 2015, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[12]  S. Agarwal,et al.  Wearable technology to improve education and patient outcomes in a cardiology fellowship program - a feasibility study , 2013 .

[13]  D. Bergin,et al.  Measuring engagement in fourth to twelfth grade classrooms: the Classroom Engagement Inventory. , 2014, School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[14]  K. Wentzel,et al.  The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. , 1995, Child development.

[15]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[16]  Katherine Isbister,et al.  Costumes and Wearables as Game Controllers , 2015, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[17]  D. K. Meyer,et al.  Re-conceptualizing Emotion and Motivation to Learn in Classroom Contexts , 2006 .

[18]  Nathaniel J. Hunsu,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[19]  J. Reeve,et al.  Enhancing Students' Engagement by Increasing Teachers' Autonomy Support , 2004 .

[20]  Javier Hernandez,et al.  SenseGlass: using google glass to sense daily emotions , 2014, UIST.

[21]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[22]  T. Kindermann,et al.  A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection , 2009 .

[23]  B. Weiner,et al.  Theories and principles of motivation. , 1996 .

[24]  Sukran Ucus,et al.  Elementary School Teachers’ Views on Game-based Learning as a Teaching Method , 2015 .

[25]  Matt Bower,et al.  What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies? , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Luis Filipe Lages,et al.  Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance , 2007 .

[27]  Rong Chen,et al.  Institutional Characteristics and College Student Dropout Risks: A Multilevel Event History Analysis , 2012 .

[28]  Monica Khanna,et al.  Identifying and analyzing touchpoints for building a higher education brand , 2014 .

[29]  V. Morris Results NOW: How We Can Achieve Unprecedented Improvements in Teaching and Learning , 2008 .

[30]  Yi-Chun Lin,et al.  Implementing clickers to assist learning in science lectures: The Clicker-Assisted Conceptual Change model , 2011 .

[31]  George D. Kuh,et al.  How to Help Students Achieve. , 2007 .

[32]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  Emotion Sensors Go To School , 2009, AIED.

[33]  Elaine. Chapman Alternative Approaches to Assessing Student Engagement Rates - Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 2016 .

[34]  Teresa Coffman,et al.  Google Glass: Using Wearable Technologies to Enhance Teaching and Learning , 2015 .

[35]  Monitoring Student Engagement and Improving Performance , 2015 .

[36]  Catherine S. Fichten,et al.  Digital Technology, Learning, and Postsecondary Students with Disabilities: Where We've Been and Where We're Going. , 2014 .

[37]  Tobias Brosch,et al.  The impact of emotion on perception, attention, memory, and decision-making. , 2013, Swiss medical weekly.

[38]  Tolga Gok,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF STUDENT RESPONSE SYSTEMS FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF INSTRUCTORS AND STUDENTS , 2011 .

[39]  Ahmad Althunibat,et al.  Determining the factors influencing students' intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  U Ruth Charrondiere,et al.  FAO/INFOODS e-Learning Course on Food Composition Data. , 2016, Food chemistry.

[41]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.