Co-managing carbon and air quality: pros and cons of local sustainability initiatives

This paper reports the pros and cons of co-management (i.e. concerted actions towards climate change and air quality management) through local sustainability initiatives using three case studies, each encompassing the planning and management issues at local government levels. Case study I is policy-based and reports the outcome of a consultation exercise while case studies II and III have greater scientific bearing. These case studies pave the way for development of a more integrated Climate Change Strategy Action Plan at local scales, specifically regarding policies on emissions sources from transportation and decentralised energy. They highlight the merits and the trade-offs of implementing local scale co-management practices, using a more integrated planning framework than what is currently under offer. We recognise that delivery of such ambitious, cross-cutting agenda may be impeded, primarily owing to limited expertise in assessing the synergies and the expected outcomes from cross-fertility between these two arenas. This calls for a step-change through more cohesive, cross-disciplinary policy frameworks, going beyond the local administrative spheres to maximise the co-management potentials while mitigating the wider environmental impacts.

[1]  G. Nemet,et al.  Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking , 2010 .

[2]  Enda T. Hayes,et al.  Introduction of local air quality management in South Africa: overview and challenges , 2012 .

[3]  M. Bell,et al.  Systems scale assessment of the sustainability implications of emerging green initiatives. , 2013, Environmental pollution.

[4]  A. Meyer Economics Of Climate Change , 1995, Nature.

[5]  N. Stern The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[6]  Jeongim Park,et al.  Quantifying costs and benefits of integrated environmental strategies of air quality management and greenhouse gas reduction in the Seoul Metropolitan Area , 2011 .

[7]  Takayuki Takeshita,et al.  Assessing the co-benefits of CO2 mitigation on air pollutants emissions from road vehicles , 2012 .

[8]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Carbon footprinting for climate change management in cities , 2011 .

[9]  R N Sainsbury,et al.  LONDON CITY AIRPORT. (WINNER OF 1994 PARKMAN MEDAL). , 1993 .

[10]  Matthew J. Aylott,et al.  Modelling supply and demand of bioenergy from short rotation coppice and Miscanthus in the UK. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[11]  Alan Meier,et al.  City carbon budgets: A proposal to align incentives for climate-friendly communities , 2010 .

[12]  Abdelillah Hamdouch,et al.  Policy integration strategy and the development of the ‘green economy’: foundations and implementation patterns , 2010 .

[13]  Jose M. Barrutia,et al.  Greening regions: the effect of social entrepreneurship, co-decision and co-creation on the embrace of good sustainable development practices , 2012 .

[14]  Tim. Chatterton Report on process and outcomes of questionnaire and workshop elements of consultation for the development of Reading Borough Council’s climate change strategy and air quality action plan , 2008 .

[15]  J. K. Symons,et al.  The development of effects based air quality management regimes , 2009 .

[16]  John P. Dawson,et al.  New Directions: Adapting air quality management to climate change: A must for planning , 2012 .

[17]  Zaid Chalabi,et al.  An integrated tool to assess the role of new planting in PM10 capture and the human health benefits: a case study in London. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[18]  M. Roe,et al.  Green Infrastructure Planning: Cross-National Analysis between the North East of England (UK) and Catalonia (Spain) , 2012 .

[19]  Tim. Chatterton,et al.  Ten years of local air quality management experience in the UK: An analysis of the process , 2007 .

[20]  A. Haines,et al.  Policies for accelerating access to clean energy, improving health, advancing development, and mitigating climate change , 2007, The Lancet.

[21]  Abhishek Tiwary,et al.  Mitigating secondary aerosol generation potentials from biofuel use in the energy sector. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  P. Quevauviller Adapting to climate change: reducing water-related risks in Europe , 2011 .

[23]  Neil Powell,et al.  A framework for facilitating dialogue between policy planners and local climate change adaptation professionals: Cases from Sweden, Canada and Indonesia , 2012 .

[24]  Yeora Chae,et al.  Co-benefit analysis of an air quality management plan and greenhouse gas reduction strategies in the Seoul metropolitan area. , 2010 .

[25]  Agostino Von Hassell,et al.  Greater London Authority , 2015 .

[26]  Enda T. Hayes,et al.  Exploring barriers to and opportunities for the co-management of air quality and carbon in South West England: a review of progress , 2009 .

[27]  Sara Moreno Pires,et al.  Surrender or resistance to the implementation of Local Agenda 21 in Portugal: the challenges of local governance for sustainable development , 2009 .

[28]  Ioan Fazey,et al.  Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  P. Quevauviller Adapting to climate change: reducing water-related risks in Europe – EU policy and research considerations , 2011 .

[30]  Tirusha Thambiran,et al.  The case for integrated air quality and climate change policies , 2011 .

[31]  Adrian C. Newton,et al.  Potential effects of future land-use change on regional carbon stocks in the UK. , 2011 .

[32]  Dotun Olowoporoku,et al.  The rhetoric and realities of integrating air quality into the local transport planning process in English local authorities. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.