Simultaneous display of MRA and MPR in detecting vascular compression for trigeminal neuralgia or hemifacial spasm: comparison with oblique sagittal views of MRI

Abstract. A new technique, simultaneous display of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), was performed by a workstation to identify the involved vessels in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) or hemifacial spasm (HFS), and the results were compared with those of oblique sagittal MRI technique. Twelve patients with either HFS or TN were prospectively assessed by simultaneous display of MRA and MPR, and oblique sagittal techniques, to point out the neurovascular compression and to identify the involved vessels. Three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) images were acquired to create MRA and MPR. Oblique sagittal views were also created and displayed on films. A total of 15 vessels in 12 patients were identified as compressing vessels during surgery. Simultaneous display of MRA and MPR technique pointed out the presence of vessels at and/or around root entry/exit zone (REZ) in all 12 patients, but proper identification by the name of the individual vessel was correct in 13 of 15 cases. However, oblique sagittal technique indicated the presence of vessels at and/or around REZ in 11 patients, but only 8 of 14 vessels were correctly identified. Our new method, simultaneous display of MRA-MPR, facilitated correct identification of the involved vessels compared with the oblique sagittal view method.

[1]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of two MR imaging techniques in the demonstration of neurovascular contact. , 1997, Radiology.

[2]  H. Jho,et al.  The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  H. Nukui,et al.  Oblique sagittal magnetic resonance imaging visualizing vascular compression of the trigeminal or facial nerve. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  W. Gardner Concerning the mechanism of trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm. , 1962, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  S. Ohta,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging for presentation of the causative vessels in patients with hemifacial spasm and trigeminal neuralgia. , 1997, Surgical neurology.

[6]  J. Meaney,et al.  Demonstration of neurovascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia with magnetic resonance imaging. Comparison with surgical findings in 52 consecutive operative cases. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  A. Perneczky,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of MRA in the diagnosis of neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia , 1998, Neuroradiology.

[8]  L. Sekhar,et al.  Repositioning of the vertebral artery as treatment for neurovascular compression syndromes. Technical note. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  H. Nukui,et al.  Prediction of Vertebral Artery Compression in Patients with Hemifacial Spasm Using Oblique Sagittal MR Imaging , 1998, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[10]  A. Kondo Follow-up results of microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm. , 1997 .

[11]  M. Takahashi,et al.  Evaluation of Vascular Compression in Trigeminal Neuralgia by 3D Time‐of‐Flight MRA , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.