Neuroretinal rim area in low tension glaucoma: Effect of nifedipine and acetazolamide compared to no treatment

Abstract The purpose of this study was to measure the change of neuroretinal rim area in patients with low tension glaucoma on‐ and off‐treatment. Thirty‐two patients were followed up for a mean of 2.6 years. Ten patients received treatment with nifedipine, 11 patients with acetazolamide and 11 patients had no treatment. The total change of rim area and the yearly rate of rim area change did not differ statistically significantly between the three groups. Seven patients in each group suffered from cold hands and feet. The response to cold provocation visual field testing was positive in 25% of patients. Neither the history of cold hands and feet nor the cold provocation test result affected the rate of progression of optic disc abnormalities. Nifedipine and acetazolamide treatment seemed to show no advantage over no‐treatment in our patients.

[1]  S. Drance,et al.  Biostatistical evidence for two distinct chronic open angle glaucoma populations. , 1990, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  S. Drance,et al.  Investigations into a vascular etiology for low-tension glaucoma. , 1990, Ophthalmology.

[3]  W. Feuer,et al.  Threshold equivalence between perimeters. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  J. Flammer,et al.  Do ocular vasospasms help cause low tension glaucoma , 1987 .

[5]  C. Phelps,et al.  Migraine and low-tension glaucoma. A case-control study. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  S. Drance,et al.  Neuroretinal rim area in early glaucoma. , 1985, American journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  S. Drance,et al.  Effect of acetazolamide on the differential threshold. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  R Z Levene,et al.  Low tension glaucoma: a critical review and new material. , 1980, Survey of ophthalmology.

[9]  S. Drance,et al.  Studies of factors involved in the production of low tension glaucoma. , 1973, Archives of ophthalmology.