Terminal QRS Complex Distortion on the Admission Electrocardiogram in Anterior Acute Myocardial Infarction and Association with Residual Flow and Infarct Size after Primary Angioplasty

Background Terminal QRS complex distortion on admission is a simple and reliable predictor of infarct size in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is uncertain, however, whether this reflects reduced myocardial perfusion of the infarct area and a larger area of the myocardium at risk. This study was conducted to investigate whether terminal QRS distortion complex on admission is a reliable predictor of reduced residual flow and a larger area of the myocardium at risk compared to patients who are admitted without a terminal QRS distortion. Methods We evaluated the relationship between terminal QRS complex distortion and residual flow to the infarct zone and risk area in 46 anterior AMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty. 99mTc-sestamibi imaging was performed at baseline and 5-9 days after angioplasty. The study population was divided into those with (Group I, n=16) and without (Group II, n=30) terminal QRS complex distortion. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The area of the myocardium at risk was higher in Group I (59.9±15.3%) than in Group II (48.6±13.7%, p<0.05; mean+SD) while the nadir measurement of the residual flow was lower in Group I (0.10±0.07) than in Group II (0.16±0.09, p<0.05). Although the final infarct size was significantly higher in Group I (40.8±17.2%) than in Group II (27.1±18.1%, p<0.05), the myocardial salvage index did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion Terminal QRS complex distortion seems to be associated with less residual flow to the infarct zone, a larger risk area and greater infarct size in patients with anterior AMI.

[1]  R. Califf,et al.  Grade III Ischemia on Presentation with Acute Myocardial Infarction Predicts Rapid Progression of Necrosis and Less Myocardial Salvage with Thrombolysis , 2002, Cardiology.

[2]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Determinants and prognostic implications of terminal QRS complex distortion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Coronary stenting plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Stent versus Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Study Investigators. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  C. Gibson,et al.  Microvascular dysfunction in acute myocardial infarction: focus on the roles of platelet and inflammatory mediators in the no-reflow phenomenon. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  T D Miller,et al.  Infarct size measured by single photon emission computed tomographic imaging with (99m)Tc-sestamibi: A measure of the efficacy of therapy in acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Circulation.

[6]  G. Wagner,et al.  Terminal QRS distortion on admission is better than ST-segment measurements in predicting final infarct size and assessing the Potential effect of thrombolytic therapy in anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. , 1998, Circulation.

[8]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Time to therapy and salvage in myocardial infarction. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Distortion of the terminal portion of the QRS on the admission electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction and correlation with infarct size and long-term prognosis (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 4 Trial). , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  G I Barbash,et al.  Prognostic significance of the admission electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Predictors of in-hospital and 6-month outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trail. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Y. Birnbaum,et al.  Prognostic significance of the initial electrocardiographic pattern in a first acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. , 1993, Chest.

[13]  G. K. David,et al.  Body surface mapping during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. QRS changes indicating regional myocardial conduction delay. , 1990, Circulation.

[14]  E. Michelson,et al.  Intramyocardial Conduction: A Major Determinant of R‐wave Amplitude During Acute Myocardial Ischemia , 1982, Circulation.

[15]  R. Holland,et al.  The QRS complex during myocardial ischemia. An experimental analysis in the porcine heart. , 1976, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[16]  L. W. Eichna,et al.  Differentiation of the Atrioventricular Conducting System of the Heart , 1961, Circulation.

[17]  R. Kloner,et al.  Consequences of brief ischemia: stunning, preconditioning, and their clinical implications: part 2. , 2001, Circulation.

[18]  R. Kloner,et al.  Consequences of brief ischemia: stunning, preconditioning, and their clinical implications: part 1. , 2001, Circulation.

[19]  A. Dana,et al.  The Preconditioning Phenomenon A Tool for the Scientist or a Clinical Reality ? , 2000 .

[20]  Y. Birnbaum,et al.  QRS complex distortion predicts no reflow after emergency angioplasty in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction , 1998, Coronary artery disease.