Program management and the creative art of coopetition: Dealing with potential tensions and synergies between spatial development projects

Abstract Public ambitions have traditionally been implemented by line managers. Project management has become more prevalent in recent decades, especially in the domain of spatial investments. Recently, a new branch of management has emerged: program management. This can be seen as an attempt to overcome the fragmentation caused by several autonomous project organizations working side by side in the larger regional system. This paper describes the application of program management in comparison with project management. Both these types of management are aimed at integrating interrelated activities that are otherwise dealt with separately. Program management also aims to synchronize project implementation trajectories. A case study is conducted of a program management experiment in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Region, where an analysis of how program and project management compete and complement each other is conducted. The case study shows that program management will not and cannot be a substitute for project management, but that attempts to combine the strengths of both have to be made.

[1]  S. Newell,et al.  Interdependencies in Complex Project Ecologies: The Case of Biomedical Innovation , 2008 .

[2]  E. Klijn,et al.  Managing Uncertainties in Networks a Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making , 2004 .

[3]  D. Partington,et al.  Attributes and levels of programme management competence: an interpretive study , 2005 .

[4]  Hugo Priemus.  System Innovation in Spatial Development: Current Dutch Approaches , 2007 .

[5]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects , 2003 .

[6]  Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid.  New Perspectives on Investment in Infrastructures , 2008 .

[7]  R. Müller,et al.  On the nature of the project as a temporary organization , 2003 .

[8]  R. Flood,et al.  Rethinking the Fifth Discipline: Learning Within the Unknowable , 1999 .

[9]  Milton D. Rosenau,et al.  Successful Project Management: A Step-by-Step Approach with Practical Examples , 1981 .

[10]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[11]  Andy Thornley,et al.  Metropolitan governance and spatial planning , 2003 .

[12]  Willy Herroelen,et al.  A hierarchical approach to multi-project planning under uncertainty , 2004 .

[13]  Paul D. Gardiner,et al.  Project Management: A Strategic Planning Approach , 2005 .

[14]  M. Engwall.  No project is an island: linking projects to history and context , 2003 .

[15]  Östen Ohlsson,et al.  Separation or integration? A dilemma when organizing development projects , 2007 .

[16]  Andrew R. Goetz,et al.  Getting realistic about megaproject planning: The case of the new Denver International Airport , 1995 .

[17]  Jens Ove Riis,et al.  Managing organizational development projects by paradoxes , 2003 .

[18]  S. Newell,et al.  Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments , 2003 .

[19]  Rodney Turner,et al.  Gower Handbook of Project Management , 1993 .

[20]  P. Glasbergen,et al.  Interactive Planning of Infrastructure: The Changing Role of Dutch Project Management , 2005 .

[21]  Roger Atkinson,et al.  Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria , 1999 .

[22]  A. Jaafari.  Project Management in the Age of Complexity and Change , 2003 .

[23]  Ken Dovey,et al.  The Role of Enterprise Logic in the Failure of Organizations to Learn and Transform , 2007 .

[24]  R. Müller,et al.  A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[25]  John M. Bryson,et al.  Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared-Power World , 1992 .

[26]  Sergio Pellegrinelli,et al.  Shaping context: the role and challenge for programmes , 2002 .

[27]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Problems in managing internal development projects in multi-project environments , 2003 .

[28]  Lasse Gerrits,et al.  Managing Complex Governance Systems , 2009 .

[29]  Christopher J. Hemingway,et al.  The importance of context in programme management: An empirical review of programme practices , 2007 .

[30]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2003 .

[31]  David Byrne,et al.  Complexity, Configurations and Cases , 2005 .

[32]  Julien Pollack,et al.  Managing soft change projects in the public sector , 2003 .

[33]  T. G. Cummings,et al.  Organization development and change , 1975 .

[34]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public-Private Partnership: , 2007 .

[35]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Partnership Arrangements: Governmental Rhetoric or Governance Scheme? , 2002 .

[36]  J. Boonstra,et al.  Dynamics of organizational change and learning , 2004 .

[37]  Willem Salet,et al.  Amsterdam and the North-Wing of the Randstad , 2003 .

[38]  D. Ferns,et al.  Developments in programme management , 1991 .

[39]  Gwyndaf Williams,et al.  Collaborative partnerships and urban change management , 2006 .

[40]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[41]  Michel Thiry,et al.  Recent developments in project-based organisations , 2007 .

[42]  Sergio Pellegrinelli,et al.  Programme management: organising project-based change , 1997 .

[43]  Lasse Gerrits,et al.  Decisions as Dynamic Equilibriums in Erratic Policy Processes , 2008 .