Statistical Properties of Tonal Harmony in Bach ’ s Chorales

This study aims to contribute empirical computational results to the understanding of tonality and harmonic structure. It analyses aspects of tonal harmony and harmonic patterns based on a statistical, computational corpus analysis of Bach’s chorales. This is carried out using a novel heuristic method of segmentation developed specifically for that purpose. Analyses of distributions of single pc sets, chord classes and pc set transitions reveal very different structural patterns in both modes, many, but not all of which accord with standard music theory. In addition, most frequent chord transitions are found to exhibit a large degree of asymmetry, or, directedness, in way that for two pc sets A,B the transition frequencies f(A→B) and f(B→A) may differ to a large extent. Distributions of unigrams and bigrams are found to follow a Zipf distribution, i.e. decay in frequency roughly according to 1/x which implies that the majority of the musical structure is governed by a few frequent elements. The findings provide evidence for an underlying harmonic syntax which results in distinct statistical patterns. A subsequent hierarchical cluster analysis of pc sets based on respective antecedent and consequent patterns finds that this information suffices to group chords into meaningful functional groups solely on intrinsic statistical grounds without regard to pitch

[1]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Linguistics and the computer analysis of tonal harmony , 1968 .

[2]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Processing Syntactic Relations in Language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Maarten van Walstijn,et al.  Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference , 2005 .

[4]  Robert O. Gjerdingen,et al.  The Cognition of Basic Musical Structures , 2004 .

[5]  Jan Beran,et al.  Statistics in Musicology , 2003 .

[6]  A. Friederici,et al.  Musical syntax is processed in Broca's area: an MEG study , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  S. C. Johnson Hierarchical clustering schemes , 1967, Psychometrika.

[8]  H. Simon,et al.  ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .

[9]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[10]  Carl Dahlhaus Untersuchungen über die Entstehung der harmonischen Tonalität , 1967 .

[11]  G. Āllport The Psycho-Biology of Language. , 1936 .

[12]  Daniel Dominic Sleator,et al.  Modeling Meter and Harmony: A Preference-Rule Approach , 1999, Computer Music Journal.

[13]  B. Tillmann Implicit Investigations of Tonal Knowledge in Nonmusician Listeners , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. Rohrmeier A generative grammar approach to diatonic harmonic structure , 2007 .

[15]  Scott J. Simon Computer models of musical creativity , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[17]  Masafumi Nishida,et al.  Analysis of Chord Progression by HPSG , 2006, Artificial Intelligence and Applications.

[18]  Petra Perner,et al.  Data Mining - Concepts and Techniques , 2002, Künstliche Intell..

[19]  Mark Steedman,et al.  A Generative Grammar for Jazz Chord Sequences , 1984 .

[20]  M. Schmuckler Expectation in music: Investigation of melodic and harmonic processes. , 1989 .

[21]  Darrell Conklin,et al.  Representation and Discovery of Multiple Viewpoint Patterns , 2001, ICMC.

[22]  Darrell Conklin,et al.  Representation and Discovery of Vertical Patterns in Music , 2002, ICMAI.

[23]  鐘期 坂本,et al.  Tonal Pitch Space を用いた楽曲の和声解析 , 2009 .

[24]  E. Bigand,et al.  More About the Musical Expertise of Musically Untrained Listeners , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  A. Forte The Structure of Atonal Music , 1973 .

[26]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Language, music, syntax and the brain , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Damián H. Zanette,et al.  Zipf's law and the creation of musical context , 2004, ArXiv.

[28]  William P. Birmingham,et al.  Algorithms for Chordal Analysis , 2002, Computer Music Journal.

[29]  S. Koelsch Neural substrates of processing syntax and semantics in music , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  Robin Sibson,et al.  The Construction of Hierarchic and Non-Hierarchic Classifications , 1968, Comput. J..

[31]  Carl Schachter,et al.  Harmony And Voice Leading , 1978 .

[32]  A. Schoenberg,et al.  Structural functions of harmony , 1954 .

[33]  Geraint A. Wiggins,et al.  EXPECTATION IN MELODY: THE INFLUENCE OF CONTEXT AND LEARNING , 2006 .

[34]  Robert O. Gjerdingen,et al.  The psychology of music , 2002 .

[35]  Aniruddh D. Patel Music, Language, and the Brain , 2007 .

[36]  C. Krumhansl,et al.  The representation of harmonic structure in music: Hierarchies of stability as a function of context , 1983, Cognition.

[37]  Siegmund Levarie,et al.  A theory of harmony , 1985 .

[38]  R. Gauldin,et al.  Harmonic Practice in Tonal Music , 1997 .

[39]  Allen Forte,et al.  Tonal Harmony in Concept and Practice , 1962 .

[40]  Jérôme Barthélemy,et al.  Figured Bass and Tonality Recognition , 2001, ISMIR.

[41]  H. John Maxwell,et al.  An expert system for harmonizing analysis of tonal music , 1992 .