Using Geographic Information Systems for Exposure Assessment in Environmental Epidemiology Studies

Geographic information systems (GIS) are being used with increasing frequency in environmental epidemiology studies. Reported applications include locating the study population by geocoding addresses (assigning mapping coordinates), using proximity analysis of contaminant source as a surrogate for exposure, and integrating environmental monitoring data into the analysis of the health outcomes. Although most of these studies have been ecologic in design, some have used GIS in estimating environmental levels of a contaminant at the individual level and to design exposure metrics for use in epidemiologic studies. In this article we discuss fundamentals of three scientific disciplines instrumental to using GIS in exposure assessment for epidemiologic studies: geospatial science, environmental science, and epidemiology. We also explore how a GIS can be used to accomplish several steps in the exposure assessment process. These steps include defining the study population, identifying source and potential routes of exposure, estimating environmental levels of target contaminants, and estimating personal exposures. We present and discuss examples for the first three steps. We discuss potential use of GIS and global positioning systems (GPS) in the last step. On the basis of our findings, we conclude that the use of GIS in exposure assessment for environmental epidemiology studies is not only feasible but can enhance the understanding of the association between contaminants in our environment and disease.

[1]  S. Openshaw.  A million or so correlation coefficients : three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem , 1979 .

[2]  Ryan S. Miller,et al.  Identifying populations potentially exposed to agricultural pesticides using remote sensing and a Geographic Information System. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  L. Queen,et al.  Introduction to Data Analysis Using Geographic Information Systems , 1991 .

[4]  Jing Nie,et al.  Positional Accuracy of Geocoded Addresses in Epidemiologic Research , 2003, Epidemiology.

[5]  K. Rothman,et al.  The smoking gun? , 2000, Epidemiology.

[6]  M Vrijheid,et al.  Risk of congenital anomalies near hazardous-waste landfill sites in Europe: the EUROHAZCON study , 1998, The Lancet.

[7]  C Brownie,et al.  The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  Eric S. Fowler,et al.  Exploring Geographic Information Systems , 1997 .

[9]  D Wartenberg,et al.  Identification and characterization of populations living near high-voltage transmission lines: a pilot study. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  D Wartenberg,et al.  Screening for lead exposure using a geographic information system. , 1992, Environmental research.

[11]  S J Thompson,et al.  Association of very low birth weight with exposures to environmental sulfur dioxide and total suspended particulates. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  Ruthann A Rudel,et al.  Historical reconstruction of wastewater and land use impacts to groundwater used for public drinking water:Exposure assessment using chemical data and GIS , 2003, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[13]  J W Hogan,et al.  On the wrong side of the tracts? Evaluating the accuracy of geocoding in public health research. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[14]  R. Lynch,et al.  Use of global positioning system technology to track subject's location during environmental exposure sampling , 2001, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[15]  Carol Hanchette,et al.  Geographic information systems: their use in environmental epidemiologic research. , 1997, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[16]  Peggy Reynolds,et al.  Childhood cancer incidence rates and hazardous air pollutants in California: an exploratory analysis. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[17]  Peggy Reynolds,et al.  Childhood cancer and agricultural pesticide use: an ecologic study in California. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[18]  Michael N. DeMers,et al.  Fundamentals of Geographic Information Systems , 1996 .

[19]  D. Wartenberg,et al.  Making environmental data accessible for public health aims. The Massachusetts Environmental Database project. , 1995, Public health reports.

[20]  L. Stallones,et al.  A geographic information assessment of birth weight and crop production patterns around mother's residence. , 2000, Environmental research.

[21]  J. Behren,et al.  Agricultural pesticide use in California: pesticide prioritization, use densities, and population distributions for a childhood cancer study. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[22]  T. Louis,et al.  Environmental justice and statistical summaries of differences in exposure distributions , 1999, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[23]  K Sexton,et al.  Residential Proximity to Industrial Sources of Air Pollution: Interrelationships among Race, Poverty, and Age , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[24]  M. Hilton.  Smoking gun. , 2000, History today.

[25]  G. Pershagen,et al.  Using geographic information systems to assess individual historical exposure to air pollution from traffic and house heating in Stockholm. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[26]  Division on Earth.  Human Exposure Assessment for Airborne Pollutants: Advances and Opportunities , 1991 .

[27]  D. Briggs,et al.  The use of geographical information systems in studies on environment and health. , 1995, World health statistics quarterly. Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales.

[28]  Walter F. Stewart,et al.  False Positive Exposure Errors and Low Exposure Prevalence in Community-Based Case-Control Studies , 1991 .

[29]  P. Comba,et al.  Risk of soft tissue sarcomas and residence in the neighbourhood of an incinerator of industrial wastes , 2003, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[30]  Beate Ritz,et al.  Historical pesticide exposure in California using pesticide use reports and land-use surveys: an assessment of misclassification error and bias. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[31]  S L Zeger,et al.  Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[32]  Using geographic information systems to assess risk for elevated blood lead levels in children. , 2003, Public health reports.

[33]  O Wigertz,et al.  Individuals living in areas with high background radon: a GIS method to identify populations at risk. , 1997, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[34]  R. B. Dean.  Book Review: Methods of assessing risk to health from exposure to hazards released from waste landfills , 2001 .

[35]  H Checkoway,et al.  Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. , 1977, American journal of epidemiology.

[36]  J Wakefield,et al.  Risk of adverse birth outcomes in populations living near landfill sites , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[37]  H. Cesar,et al.  Evaluation of Human Exposure to Ambient PM10 in the Metropolitan Area of Mexico City Using a GIS-Based Methodology , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[38]  Mohammad Ali,et al.  Spatial filtering using a raster geographic information system: methods for scaling health and environmental data. , 2002, Health & place.

[39]  Douglas J. Crawford-Brown.  Mathematical Methods of Environmental Risk Modeling , 2001 .

[40]  Steven G Inserra,et al.  Community-based exposure estimate for hydrogen sulfide , 2002, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[41]  Kai Elgethun,et al.  Time-location analysis for exposure assessment studies of children using a novel global positioning system instrument. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[42]  Lorann Stallones,et al.  Exposure to Trihalomethanes and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes , 1998, Epidemiology.

[43]  Fredrik Nyberg,et al.  Urban Air Pollution and Lung Cancer in Stockholm , 2000, Epidemiology.

[44]  S R Palmer,et al.  Assessment of impact on health of residents living near the Nant-y-Gwyddon landfill site: retrospective analysis. , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[45]  Patrick Arveux,et al.  Dioxin Emissions from a Solid Waste Incinerator and Risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma , 2003, Epidemiology.

[46]  Peggy Reynolds,et al.  Traffic patterns and childhood cancer incidence rates in California, United States , 2002, Cancer Causes & Control.

[47]  GEORGE CHRISTAKOS,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of environmental exposure–health effect associations , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[48]  E. King,et al.  HUMAN EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT FOR AIRBORNE POLLUTANTS : ADVANCES AND OPPORTUNITIES , 1992 .

[49]  W Kent Anger,et al.  Neurobehavioral effects of exposure to trichloroethylene through a municipal water supply. , 2003, Environmental research.

[50]  I. Hertz-Picciotto,et al.  A Case-Control Study of Pesticides and Fetal Death Due to Congenital Anomalies , 2001, Epidemiology.

[51]  A S Fotheringham,et al.  The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1991 .

[52]  Bryan Langholz,et al.  Traffic density and the risk of childhood leukemia in a Los Angeles case-control study. , 2002, Annals of epidemiology.

[53]  M Vrijheid,et al.  Health effects of residence near hazardous waste landfill sites: a review of epidemiologic literature. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[54]  J. Beyea,et al.  Geographic exposure modeling: a valuable extension of geographic information systems for use in environmental epidemiology. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[55]  S. Melly,et al.  Using GIS and historical records to reconstruct residential exposure to large-scale pesticide application , 2002, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.