Quantification of esophageal wall thickness in CT using atlas-based segmentation technique

Esophageal wall thickness is an important predictor of esophageal cancer response to therapy. In this study, we developed a computerized pipeline for quantification of esophageal wall thickness using computerized tomography (CT). We first segmented the esophagus using a multi-atlas-based segmentation scheme. The esophagus in each atlas CT was manually segmented to create a label map. Using image registration, all of the atlases were aligned to the imaging space of the target CT. The deformation field from the registration was applied to the label maps to warp them to the target space. A weighted majority-voting label fusion was employed to create the segmentation of esophagus. Finally, we excluded the lumen from the esophagus using a threshold of -600 HU and measured the esophageal wall thickness. The developed method was tested on a dataset of 30 CT scans, including 15 esophageal cancer patients and 15 normal controls. The mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean absolute distance (MAD) between the segmented esophagus and the reference standard were employed to evaluate the segmentation results. Our method achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 65.55 ± 10.48% and mean MAD of 1.40 ± 1.31 mm for all the cases. The mean esophageal wall thickness of cancer patients and normal controls was 6.35 ± 1.19 mm and 6.03 ± 0.51 mm, respectively. We conclude that the proposed method can perform quantitative analysis of esophageal wall thickness and would be useful for tumor detection and tumor response evaluation of esophageal cancer.

[1]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  GRAM: A framework for geodesic registration on anatomical manifolds , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[4]  Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano,et al.  Combination Strategies in Multi-Atlas Image Segmentation: Application to Brain MR Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[6]  R. Iyer,et al.  Imaging of esophageal cancer , 2004, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[7]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  V. Rusch,et al.  Clinical tools do not predict pathological complete response in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. , 2014, Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

[9]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Neural Network Ensembles , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  R. Munden,et al.  Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  Martin Styner,et al.  Multi-atlas segmentation of subcortical brain structures via the AutoSeg software pipeline , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[14]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  A Generative Model for Image Segmentation Based on Label Fusion , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.