Prediction of Competition Indices in a Norway Spruce and Silver Fir-Dominated Forest Using Lidar Data

Competitive interactions are important predictors of tree growth. Spatial and temporal changes in resource availability, and variation in species and spatial patterning of trees alter competitive interactions, thus affecting tree growth and, hence, biomass. Competition indices are used to quantify the level of competition among trees. As these indices are normally computed only over small areas, where field measurements are done, it would be useful to have a tool to predict them over large areas. On this regard, remote sensing, and in particular light detection and ranging (lidar) data, could be the perfect tool. The objective of this study was to use lidar metrics to predict competition (on the basis of distance-dependent competition indices) of individual trees and to relate them with tree aboveground biomass (AGB). The selected study area was a mountain forest area located in the Italian Alps. The analyses focused on the two dominant species of the area: Silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst). The results showed that lidar metrics could be used to predict competition indices of individual trees (R2 above 0.66). Moreover, AGB decreased as competition increased, suggesting that variations in the availability of resources in the soil, and the ability of plants to withstand competition for light may influence the partitioning of biomass.

[1]  Jianguo Huang,et al.  Contributions of competition and climate on radial growth of Pinus massoniana in subtropics of China , 2019, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[2]  Quang V. Cao,et al.  Evaluation of distance-independent competition indices in predicting tree survival and diameter growth , 2019, Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

[3]  Aaron R. Weiskittel,et al.  Comparing performance of contrasting distance-independent and distance-dependent competition metrics in predicting individual tree diameter increment and survival within structurally-heterogeneous, mixed-species forests of Northeastern United States , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[4]  Frank Berninger,et al.  The roles of competition and climate in tree growth variation in northern boreal old‐growth forests , 2018, Journal of Vegetation Science.

[5]  Turan Sönmez,et al.  A novel approach to selecting a competition index: the effect of competition on individual-tree diameter growth of Calabrian pine , 2018, Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

[6]  Wenzhen Liu,et al.  A novel approach for assessing the neighborhood competition in two different aged forests , 2018, Forest Ecology and Management.

[7]  Qinghua Guo,et al.  Quantifying individual tree growth and tree competition using bi-temporal airborne laser scanning data: a case study in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California , 2018, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[8]  Michele Dalponte,et al.  Predicting stem diameters and aboveground biomass of individual trees using remote sensing data , 2018 .

[9]  Hairong Han,et al.  Effect of intraspecific competition on biomass partitioning of Larix principis-rupprechtii , 2018 .

[10]  Cheng Wang,et al.  Utility of multitemporal lidar for forest and carbon monitoring: Tree growth, biomass dynamics, and carbon flux , 2018 .

[11]  D. R. Almeida,et al.  Enhancing of accuracy assessment for forest above-ground biomass estimates obtained from remote sensing via hypothesis testing and overfitting evaluation , 2017 .

[12]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Single-Sensor Solution to Tree Species Classification Using Multispectral Airborne Laser Scanning , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Mark C. Vanderwel,et al.  Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes , 2016, Global change biology.

[14]  Aaron R. Weiskittel,et al.  Individual-Tree Competition Indices and Improved Compatibility with Stand-Level Estimates of Stem Density and Long-Term Production , 2016 .

[15]  Venceslas Goudiaby,et al.  Overyielding of temperate mixed forests occurs in evergreen–deciduous but not in deciduous–deciduous species mixtures over time in the Netherlands , 2016 .

[16]  Gavin Thomson,et al.  An IPCC-Compliant Technique for Forest Carbon Stock Assessment Using Airborne LiDAR-Derived Tree Metrics and Competition Index , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[17]  Michele Dalponte,et al.  Tree‐centric mapping of forest carbon density from airborne laser scanning and hyperspectral data , 2016, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[18]  Zhen Zhen,et al.  Trends in Automatic Individual Tree Crown Detection and Delineation - Evolution of LiDAR Data , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[19]  Olivier Bouriaud,et al.  Climate modulates the effects of tree diversity on forest productivity , 2016 .

[20]  David A. Coomes,et al.  Modelling above-ground carbon dynamics using multi-temporal airborne lidar: insights from a Mediterranean woodland , 2015 .

[21]  Brian Tobin,et al.  Different mixtures of Norway spruce, silver fir, and European beech modify competitive interactions in central European mature mixed forests , 2015 .

[22]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  A Benchmark of Lidar-Based Single Tree Detection Methods Using Heterogeneous Forest Data from the Alpine Space , 2015 .

[23]  Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa,et al.  Estimating Forest Biomass Dynamics by Integrating Multi-Temporal Landsat Satellite Images with Ground and Airborne LiDAR Data in the Coal Valley Mine, Alberta, Canada , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[24]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Modeling Aboveground Biomass in Dense Tropical Submontane Rainforest Using Airborne Laser Scanner Data , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[25]  Demetrios Gatziolis,et al.  Modeling Forest Aboveground Biomass and Volume Using Airborne LiDAR Metrics and Forest Inventory and Analysis Data in the Pacific Northwest , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[26]  Elinore J. Theobald,et al.  Competition alters tree growth responses to climate at individual and stand scales , 2015 .

[27]  Uta Berger,et al.  The role of belowground competition and plastic biomass allocation in altering plant mass–density relationships , 2014 .

[28]  Stan Lipovetsky.  How Good is Best? Multivariate Case of Ehrenberg-Weisberg Analysis of Residual Errors in Competing Regressions , 2013 .

[29]  E. Schulze,et al.  Crown modeling by terrestrial laser scanning as an approach to assess the effect of aboveground intra- and interspecific competition on tree growth , 2013 .

[30]  Chien-Shun Lo,et al.  Growth-Competition-Based Stem Diameter and Volume Modeling for Tree-Level Forest Inventory Using Airborne LiDAR Data , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  P. Reich,et al.  Tree species diversity increases fine root productivity through increased soil volume filling , 2013 .

[32]  Guoqing Sun,et al.  Evaluating Prospects for Improved Forest Parameter Retrieval From Satellite LiDAR Using a Physically-Based Radiative Transfer Model , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[33]  Toma Buba,et al.  Prediction equations for estimating tree height, crown diameter, crown height and crown ratio of Parkia biglobosa in the Nigerian guinea savanna , 2012 .

[34]  Jerzy Szwagrzyk,et al.  Shade-tolerant tree species from temperate forests differ in their competitive abilities: a case study from Roztocze, south-eastern Poland. , 2012 .

[35]  Chih-Hsin Chung,et al.  Distance-Dependent Competition Measures for Individual Tree Growth on a Taiwania Plantation in the Liuguei Area , 2012 .

[36]  P. Reich,et al.  Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[37]  Woodam Chung,et al.  Evaluating tree competition indices as predictors of basal area increment in western Montana forests , 2011 .

[38]  Zhili Feng,et al.  Evaluation of competition and light estimation indices for predicting diameter growth in mature boreal mixed forests , 2007, Annals of Forest Science.

[39]  Helge Bruelheide,et al.  Tree morphology responds to neighbourhood competition and slope in species-rich forests of subtropical China , 2010 .

[40]  Robert A. Monserud,et al.  Do individual-tree growth models correctly represent height:diameter ratios of Norway spruce and Scots pine? , 2010, Forest ecology and management.

[41]  T. Ledermann,et al.  Evaluating the performance of semi-distance-independent competition indices in predicting the basal area growth of individual trees , 2010 .

[42]  D. Forrester,et al.  Enhanced water use efficiency in a mixed Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii plantation. , 2010 .

[43]  Rasmus Astrup,et al.  Competition and tree crowns: a neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species. , 2010 .

[44]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package , 2008 .

[45]  Adrian Ares,et al.  Vegetation competition effects on aboveground biomass and macronutrients, leaf area, and crown structure in 5-year old Douglas-fir , 2008, New Forests.

[46]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems , 2007 .

[47]  H. Lee Allen,et al.  The Development of Pine Plantation Silviculture in the Southern United States , 2007 .

[48]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Crown Plasticity and Competition for Canopy Space: A New Spatially Implicit Model Parameterized for 250 North American Tree Species , 2007, PloS one.

[49]  D. Coomes,et al.  Effects of size, competition and altitude on tree growth , 2007 .

[50]  M. Sebastià,et al.  Plant guilds drive biomass response to global warming and water availability in subalpine grassland , 2006 .

[51]  Michael J. Papaik,et al.  Multi-model analysis of tree competition along environmental gradients in southern New England forests. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[52]  Stuart J. Davies,et al.  Tree growth is related to light interception and wood density in two mixed dipterocarp forests of Malaysia , 2005 .

[53]  Hailemariam Temesgen,et al.  Tree crown ratio models for multi-species and multi-layered stands of southeastern British Columbia , 2005 .

[54]  James S. Clark,et al.  Tree growth prediction using size and exposed crown area , 2005 .

[55]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  Fusion of Small-Footprint Lidar and Multispectral Data to Estimate Plot- Level Volume and Biomass in Deciduous and Pine Forests in Virginia, USA , 2004, Forest Science.

[56]  C. Canham,et al.  A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition : effects of shading versus crowding , 2004 .

[57]  Miguel Espinosa,et al.  Needle mass, fine root and stem wood production in response to silvicultural treatment, tree size and competitive status in radiata pine stands , 2003 .

[58]  L. Zhang,et al.  Local Analysis of Tree Competition and Growth , 2003 .

[59]  Harold E. Burkhart,et al.  Conditioning a distance-dependent competition index to indicate the onset of inter-tree competition , 2003 .

[60]  Guy R. Larocque.  Examining different concepts for the development of a distance-dependent competition model for red pine diameter growth using long-term stand data differing in initial stand density , 2002 .

[61]  B. Casper,et al.  Investigating the relationship between neighbor root biomass and belowground competition: field evidence for symmetric competition belowground , 2000 .

[62]  Gregory S. Biging,et al.  Evaluation of Competition Indices in Individual Tree Growth Models , 1995, Forest Science.

[63]  Harold E. Burkhart,et al.  Distance-Dependent Competition Measures for Predicting Growth of Individual Trees , 1989, Forest Science.

[64]  Herman H. Shugart,et al.  A comparison of tree growth models , 1985 .

[65]  R. Waring,et al.  Stem Growth per Unit of Leaf Area: A Measure of Tree Vigor , 1980 .

[66]  R. L. Davidson.  Effect of Root/Leaf Temperature Differentials on Root/Shoot Ratios in Some Pasture Grasses and Clover , 1969 .